Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Canada Facebook Government Privacy Social Networks Your Rights Online

The Woman Who's Making Your Privacy Her Business 120

davecb writes "The woman who faced down Facebook and was dissed by Silicon Valley business boys as 'an old-fashioned scold' is really one of the early advocates for using the internet for access to information, and to open up government. The Globe and Mail has an interview with Jennifer Stoddart, the privacy commissioner of Canada, who went up against Facebook for all of us, and made them back down."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

The Woman Who's Making Your Privacy Her Business

Comments Filter:
  • Re:For all of us? (Score:5, Informative)

    by d6 ( 1944790 ) on Sunday December 12, 2010 @01:34PM (#34529402)
    All of us in Canada at least. She seems to take her mandate seriously.
  • Re:For all of us? (Score:5, Informative)

    by Mashiki ( 184564 ) <mashiki@nosPaM.gmail.com> on Sunday December 12, 2010 @02:17PM (#34529604) Homepage

    Honestly? For a privacy commissioner she's done a hell of a job. Taking her mandate seriously? I'd say so. Conservative, Liberal, NDP, Green, Bloc, small business, big business, internet related. NGO's, and so on. If you break the privacy act, you'll have her breathing down your neck fast. She's about as non-partisan, and pro-privacy as you can get.

  • by Anonymous Coward on Sunday December 12, 2010 @02:17PM (#34529608)

    "I'm starting to hate the internet. More and more it seems like the internet is turning into one big bug in the ass. I have to specifically opt out of fucking invasive bullshit toolbars that I didn't ask for, had no interest in, and no desire to have corrupting my machine. I got an idea for all you assholes who think that is the way to make money....HOWS ABOUT YOU WORK ON PROJECTS THAT MAKE US FREER RATHER THAN FURTHER CONFINE OR TRACK US??? Is it really so much to ask to be able to scan, upload, download, chat, skype, mud, "be on the web" without fear of being constantly surveiled? I'm not a tree. My psychological profile, shopping habits, surfing habits, political interests, are not "fruit" to be picked and sold on the market, and as such ARE NONE OF YOUR FUCKING BUSINESS!!! If I want your shit, I will use the most powerful investigatory tool humankind has ever invented, find it myself, and possibly even buy it! If what you had to offer was worth having I might even buy it again. But, until that point, LEAVE ME THE FUCK ALONE!

    -Oz" -

    Ok, then YOU of all people, want to read this (not selling anything here, HOSTS files free & you already have one (you just have to fill your OS' copy of your HOSTS file w/ the right data to stop a lot of the problems you complain of online, & reputable + reliable sources for currently updated HOSTS files are below)):

    16++ ADVANTAGES OF HOSTS FILES OVER DNS SERVERS &/or ADBLOCK ALONE for added layered security:

    1.) Adblock blocks ads in only 1 browser family (Disclaimer: Opera now has an AdBlock addon (now that Opera has addons above widgets), but I am not certain the same people make it as they do for FF or Chrome etc.).

    2.) HOSTS files are useable for all these purposes because they are present on all Operating Systems that have a BSD based IP stack (even ANDROID) and do adblocking for ANY webbrowser, email program, etc. (any webbound program).

    3.) Adblock doesn't protect email programs external to FF, Hosts files do. THIS IS GOOD VS. SPAM MAIL or MAILS THAT BEAR MALICIOUS SCRIPT, or, THAT POINT TO MALICIOUS SCRIPT VIA URLS etc.

    4.) Adblock won't get you to your favorite sites if a DNS server goes down or is DNS-poisoned, hosts will (this leads to points 4-7 next below).

    5.) Adblock doesn't allow you to hardcode in your favorite websites into it so you don't make DNS server calls and so you can avoid tracking by DNS request logs, hosts do (DNS servers are also being abused by the Chinese lately and by the Kaminsky flaw -> http://www.networkworld.com/news/2008/082908-kaminsky-flaw-prompts-dns-server.html [networkworld.com] for years now). Hosts protect against those problems via hardcodes of your fav sites (you should verify against the TLD that does nothing but cache IPAddress-to-domainname/hostname resolutions via PINGS &/or WHOIS though, regularly, so you have the correct IP & it's current)).

    6.) HOSTS files protect you vs. DNS-poisoning &/or the Kaminsky flaw in DNS servers, and allow you to get to sites reliably vs. things like the Chinese are doing to DNS -> http://yro.slashdot.org/story/10/11/29/1755230/Chinese-DNS-Tampering-a-Real-Threat-To-Outsiders [slashdot.org]

    7.) AdBlock doesn't let you block out known bad sites or servers that are known to be maliciously scripted, hosts can and many reputable lists for this exist:

    GOOD INFORMATION ON MALWARE BEHAVIOR LISTING BOTNET C&C SERVERS + MORE (AS WELL AS REMOVAL LISTS FOR HOSTS):

    http://ddanchev.blogspot.com/ [blogspot.com]
    http://www.malware.com.br/lists.shtml [malware.com.br]
    http://www.stopbadware.org/ [stopbadware.org]
    http://blog.fireeye.com/ [fireeye.com]

  • Re:I, deal list (Score:5, Informative)

    by VortexCortex ( 1117377 ) <VortexCortex@pro ... m minus language> on Sunday December 12, 2010 @02:25PM (#34529650)

    governments should hoard information, at least in the traditional sense, to keep it hidden from other national governments. Unless you think every nation in the word should have the same information as every other

    Nah, Governments shouldn't hoard information at all.

    They should only keep "vital" information under wraps for at most 2 years, then make it all public (not hording, hording = "never gonna give you up")

    The only exception I can see is for long term military planning. Do we really need to use deceit in our diplomatic affairs? What's wrong with stating our goals and working to those ends? (It's not like we're really confounding our "enemies" by keeping diplomatic secrets).

    Unfortunately, under such an "idealist" information policy, everything will just get categorized as "military planning."

    You know... Just like nearly everything currently finds its way under the "national security" umbrella, even though most info is not. Hint: ACTA was held under the "national security" umbrella, now it's not; Guess it wasn't a matter of "national security" was it?

    Corrupt governments will always hide under the "national security" blanket, even if you rename it to "military planning" or "diplomatic privacy".

  • Re:For all of us? (Score:3, Informative)

    by markzip ( 1313025 ) on Sunday December 12, 2010 @04:05PM (#34530168)
    You need to block Facebook widgets because they track even without your being signed in (or even a member):
    Facebook's 'Like This' button is tracking you (Whether you click it or not) [thinq.co.uk]
    which is derived from this paper:
    Facebook Tracks and Traces Everyone: Like This! [ssrn.com] (Social Science Research Network)
    Assuming you are not a member of facebook and have no need of the "Share" and "Like" buttons, the hosts file is your friend. Just enter 127.0.0.1 for facebook.net, facebook.com, facebookcdn.com (there may be others but I can't be bothered to look for them right now)
  • by dogsbreath ( 730413 ) on Sunday December 12, 2010 @05:16PM (#34530456)

    You certainly have something to say... with all respect, why don't you login? I post AC sometimes when it's best for me but I find its best to attach an account to my statements. IMHO.

Living on Earth may be expensive, but it includes an annual free trip around the Sun.

Working...