Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system


Forgot your password?
Canada Communications The Courts The Internet Your Rights Online

Canadian Supreme Court To Decide If Linking Is Publishing 82

Posted by Soulskill
from the followed-by-a-ruling-on-whether-apples-are-oranges dept.
An anonymous reader writes "Will Canada become a black hole in cyberspace? Or will it remain a country of which former prime minister Wilfred Laurier once said, 'Canada is free and freedom is its nationality.' According to p2pnet's Jon Newton, that'll be for the nine members of the federal Supreme Court to decide. Newton was sued by ex-Green Party of Canada financier Wayne Crookes for allegedly defaming him by linking to a story Crookes didn't like. Newton is now back home on Vancouver Island after traveling to Ottawa for the SCC hearing. Was it win or lose? It's an 'Epic Fail' for Crookes, Newton says. The Supreme Court reserved its decision. Its rulings are 'typically released six to eight months after a hearing,' according to the CBC in its report on the case. Says Ars Technica, 'As CIPPIC puts it, if Newton loses, the ruling could "chill hyperlinking which in turn undermines the communicative force of the Internet and deters innovation of new, expression-enhancing platforms that may not develop due to fear of defamation actions."'"
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Canadian Supreme Court To Decide If Linking Is Publishing

Comments Filter:
  • Must be consistent (Score:2, Interesting)

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday December 11, 2010 @09:31AM (#34522994)

    If they choose that to be the case, then they have to be consistent. Meaning the paper equivalency must also be considered publishing. So no more citing sources in essays.

Top Ten Things Overheard At The ANSI C Draft Committee Meetings: (7) Well, it's an excellent idea, but it would make the compilers too hard to write.