Emergency Broadcast System Coming To Cell Phones 256
gambit3 writes "The Emergency Broadcast System that interrupts TV programming in times of crisis is jumping to a new format where it might be able to reach you better — on your cell phone. The communications company Alcatel-Lucent announced Tuesday that it's creating a Broadcast Message Center that will allow government agencies to send cell phone users specific information in the event of a local, state or national emergency. It will be similar to the TV alerts in that the text messages will be geographically targeted for areas where a tornado alert or major road closure, for example, is in effect."
defeated by DOT plans to jam cell signals? (Score:4, Interesting)
It sounds like this would be rendered largely moot by DOT plans to disable cell phones in cars [yahoo.com].
Reverse 911? (Score:1, Interesting)
How is this any different from a mobile-specific reverse 911?
Re:will you have to pay for incoming and roaming (Score:2, Interesting)
How will it work for travelling situations? (Score:2, Interesting)
CBSMS? (Score:3, Interesting)
Umm, what? There's already cell broadcast messages already defined in the original GSM spec!
No need to reinvent the wheel!
These were planned to be used from emergency systems to location specific advertising. Anyone have any idea why it was never used for anything?
Re:You mean... (Score:5, Interesting)
I like the idea (Score:5, Interesting)
pool (Score:4, Interesting)
How long before the access control to this is subverted and nationwide penis enhancement texts start arriving?
I'll take 3 weeks after deployment.
Already get these (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:Uh, would someone care to explain... (Score:1, Interesting)
The reason it *CAN* soon go to mobile devices is because CAP is an IP based distribution system instead of an "over the air" distribution system.
Does it support IPv6?
Earthquake potential? (Score:3, Interesting)
One of the common reasons that is given for having no earthquake alert system is that we can only predict an earth quake a matter of seconds in advance.
The idea of sending a text message to peoples cell phones, if done with some automated system, could potentially be used for this.
Though the question is how bogged down the cell networks would get, or if they'd have some sort of universal-packet where the cell-towers simply broadcast it to all phones, rather than targeting each phone individually.
Re:will you have to pay for incoming and roaming (Score:3, Interesting)
Not only that, but cities and counties are getting into the act, wanting to add franchise fees to cellular services to pay for E911 and public safety dispatch call centers. The ever-money-hungry city and county pols are unhappy that cell phone callers can clog the lines of the 911 PSAP without paying to fund the call answerers. They don't see the ability of a cellphone customer to make an immediate report of a traffic accident, as opposed to driving to a payphone and calling it in, to be of any public benefit worthy of subsidy. That, and more people are dropping landline phones and the associated access fees and charges and taxes in favor of cells.
Now, as an old-timer, I know that franchise fees are supposed to be payment for the use of public rights-of-way -- in exchange for $X per sub the cable company can run their cables on city easements and whatever, for example. Cell services don't have that cost to the city so there is no reason to have a franchise fee. In fact, cell companies AREN'T franchised by the city or county so a franchise fee is just a dishonest way of calling for a tax.
Our fair city tried to push a cellphone tax through a couple of years ago. It failed miserably because it was a tax that they put up for a vote. They just added "fees" to our water to pay for sidewalk maintenance and free bus service for all, so I don't doubt that the time the cellphone tax comes up, it will be a franchise fee instead.