Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
Privacy Communications Facebook Government Social Networks The Courts Your Rights Online

The Intimate Social Graph 21

Posted by Soulskill
from the anything-you-tweet-may-be-used-against-you-in-a-court-of-law dept.
jamie tips an article by Slashdot vet Keith Dawson about the uncertain state of privacy protection for one-to-one online communications through social sites and services. Quoting: "The privacy of these communications is protected mainly under a law — ECPA, the Electronic Communications Privacy Act — dating from 1986 and crafted for then-existing email (think Compuserve and Prodigy) and emerging cellular networks. This law is an increasingly poor fit for modern and emerging communication modalities. Email stored on servers is treated differently depending on whether or not the user has read a particular message; and messages older than 6 months in storage enjoy different protection than newer messages. In attempting to apply the ECPA to social networking media, courts have interpreted users' privacy rights in a variety of ways. ... One shortcoming of the ECPA is that it does not require email, search engine, cloud computing or social networking sites to report how many requests for private data they get from authorities. Whatever the number, it almost certainly dwarfs the number of real-time online intercepts (wiretap, pen register, and trap and trace orders), for which statistics must be kept."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

The Intimate Social Graph

Comments Filter:
  • GPG FTW (Score:2, Informative)

    by Anonymous Coward

    GPG is ported to about everything in creation. If you care about email privacy, use it. It makes whatever the law says some company must do irrelevant, and guards against "accidental" leaks by those companies.

    Nearly every ISP provides you with POP or other mail. Run your own mail client: most have built in support for GPG so it's transparent to you once you have made your keys.

    Depending on some "benevolent entity" to protect you is unwise.

    • Re:GPG FTW (Score:5, Interesting)

      by icebraining (1313345) on Friday October 15, 2010 @07:23PM (#33914102) Homepage

      Of course, getting your recipients to accept and send encrypted mails is a different matter.

      I have GPG configured and sent the grand total of 3 emails using it. Nobody else I know (in an entire CS course, both teachers and colleagues) has a public key I can use. Even if they understand the concept (I've explained it some times) they simply don't care.

      • If operating systems (including the desktop environments) treated keys and certificates as interesting standardized objects complete with consistent/appropriate icons, it would help people feel familiar with and in control of privacy measures like PGP.

        It would help further if the FOSS world and other techies had their druthers and started an initiative to identify/brand communications software as adhering to a certain standard that is both consumer-friendly and devoid of any backdoors. If the software carri

        • by Burz (138833)

          Interestingly, the ZPhone website now has this:

          Submitted to IETF as a proposal for a public standard, and source code is published

          So maybe ZPhone itself would serve as a kind of assurance of privacy/trust.

      • by Jotii (932365)
        Your OpenPGP key (093461E7) expired two years ago. A good way to promote the usage of OpenPGP encryption is to always be ready to accept encryptet emails.
  • Does this mean he no longer works at Slashdot?

  • Is this article FUBAR? What's with the title? What do the terms "Intimate Social Graph" have to do with law enforcement snooping on stored electronic correspondence? Anyway, I think the safe thing to assume is, anything you send online in the clear is potentially open for anyone with interest and some technical experience to intercept and learn about you. There should be no expectation of privacy for that sort of information. If you proceed with that assumption in mind, you won't be disappointed if you fin
    • by yahwotqa (817672)

      Anything with "social (network|graph)", "web 2.0", "html5" "i(phone|pad)" in the title will get more pagehits on /., don't you know that?

The universe does not have laws -- it has habits, and habits can be broken.

Working...