Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Privacy Social Networks The Internet

Schneier's Revised Taxonomy of Social Data 28

Jamie noted that over at Schneier's blog, he has a worthwhile entry on the data in the social networks. He writes "Lately I've been reading about user security and privacy — control, really — on social networking sites. The issues are hard and the solutions harder, but I'm seeing a lot of confusion in even forming the questions. Social networking sites deal with several different types of user data, and it's essential to separate them."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Schneier's Revised Taxonomy of Social Data

Comments Filter:
  • by SomePoorSchmuck ( 183775 ) on Tuesday August 10, 2010 @01:43PM (#33206548) Homepage

    The funny thing about Facebook is that it is similar to television: You've been given the impression you're the customer, but you're actually the product being sold to the real customers - advertisers.

    Facebook just takes it another step, because you're voluntarily giving them extensive data about who you are as an individual, as well as involuntarily (or unknowingly for most people) letting the technology create profiles of your browsing habits. If that weren't enough, there is the further twist - at least on TV there are professional artists and actors and creative types who are producing the content you enjoy. On Facebook, the content is created by you and your friends and given away for free to the website owners.

    So all they have to do is create a database infrastructure, then you and your friends come along and do almost all the Data Entry, and while you're doing it they're watching you and adding meta-data to their private database, then they can turn around and sell all the aggregate data to their customers. Profit!

    At the peak of the show "Friends", Jennifer Aniston was getting paid a million dollars for pretending to be Rachel whatsherface for each 30 minute episode. The million dollars ultimately came from advertisers who bought airtime from the network.

    We are now self-creating global databases with billions of entries and in return are getting... the ability to "poke" someone from your 10th grade Health class. Meanwhile, how much money is Google, Facebook, BlackPlanet, etc. making from both the ads already on their sites, and the immediate/future revenue from the data we are giving them?

  • by Fnord666 ( 889225 ) on Tuesday August 10, 2010 @01:49PM (#33206606) Journal

    Really this is the problem with the whole privacy thing that has caused so much issue in the past. The problem isn't that the company collects the data, it is that they then sell it to third parties to make a profit.

    One important thing to keep in mind is that the users of these sites are not the customer, they (or at least the data that they generate) are the merchandise.

  • not just "selling" (Score:2, Insightful)

    by paramour ( 110003 ) on Tuesday August 10, 2010 @02:27PM (#33207060)

    The problem isn't that the company collects the data, it is that they then sell it to third parties to make a profit.

    No, the problem isn't limited to selling. Data gets lost or stolen with alarming frequency: someone leaves a laptop on a train, with the data unencrypted; a web site permits SQL injection hacks; an employee walks away with with a flash drive; a National Security Letter arrives. You're lucky if you ever hear of any of these happening.

    So even if the company has the best intentions and never sells or misuses the data, if they do not or can not secure it I'd rather they not have it.

To program is to be.

Working...