Author Drops Copyright Case Against Scribd Filter 81
natehoy writes "Apparently, monitoring for copyright violations is not in itself a copyright violation, lawyers for Elaine Scott decided. As a result, they have dropped the lawsuit against Scribd, who was being simultaneously sued for allowing copies of Scott's work to be published, and retaining an unlicensed copy of the work in their filtering software to try and prevent future copyright violations."
knew that! (Score:3, Funny)
Of course, I knew that already. My hard-drive contents, including the "diff" program are one big copyright violation monitoring tool.
A real shame. That was a brilliant business model. (Score:2, Funny)
2 - sue when copies of copyrighted works appear on site.
3 - PROFIT!
Re:Seriously? (Score:5, Funny)
Sorry, a hash is a derivative work.
Re:Seriously? (Score:5, Funny)
The deposition goes like so:
Plaintiff's attorney: Are you blocking users from uploading content belonging to my client?
Defendant: Yes.
Plaintiff's attorney: How?
Defendant: We compare uploaded items to a copy of the book on our server.
Plaintiff's attorney: I see. And did you pay for it?
Defendant: What?
Plaintiff's attorney: This book, that you have on your server.
Defendant: Uh, yes. We bought it at Borders and scanned it in.
Plaintiff's attorney: Did you buy a license to make an electronic copy of the hardcopy you purchased?
Defendant: A what?
Plaintiff's attorney: (makes a note).
Defendant: Aw, shit.
Judge! (Score:2, Funny)
I wish they would have been found guilty (Score:2, Funny)