France Says D-Star Ham Radio Mode Is Illegal 282
Posted
by
timothy
from the centralized-decision-making dept.
from the centralized-decision-making dept.
gyrogeerloose writes "Citing 'national security concerns,' the French Autorité de Régulation des Communications Électroniques et des Postes (ARCEP, France's equivalent of the US's FCC) has ruled that D-Star, an amateur radio digital signal mode used world-wide, is illegal because it could allow operators to connect to the Internet.The ARCEP also cites alleged concerns regarding cryptography and national security as well as the use of a proprietary codec. While it's true that the D-Star codec is proprietary, its owner has openly licensed it (for a fee, of course) to any manufacturer who wants to build it into their equipment. Any licensed amateur radio operator who lives within the EU can sign an online petition protesting this decision."
Re:Wait, What? (Score:5, Informative)
As a ham in the U.S., I can tell you that here, there is a severe restriction on communication in that no commercial messages may be relayed. It took years for the FCC to grant an exemption to allow hams to autopatch to order pizza.
As far as I know, there's no exemption for ads (adsense or otherwise), which would severely restrict what traffic you could have over the session. IRC MOTDs that advertise the hosting service? AdSense web ads? Nope, nope.
Re:Wait, What? (Score:3, Informative)
I think that is a mistake.
I believe the big problem is that they believe the proprietary codec counts as encryption.
HAM radio operators are not allowed to encrypt their data The reference may be to using it to to connect to the web using SSL which would also be illegal over an Armature radio link because it is encrypted.
What I wonder is how much bandwidth is this using and what else is involved. There is more than just a codec but also how the bits are transmitted across the link. Just from the Amateur radio people I know I doubt that it is as dumb of an objection as the story made it seem.
Re:Wait, What? (Score:5, Informative)
France takes their mobile phones communications very seriously - you have to provide a photocopy of your ID just to get a Mobicarte (Pay-As-You-Go) SIM card. Even then it will be deactivated if you don't use it after three months.
I get the impression they really want to know the identity of anyone who surfs the web.
Re:Wait, What? (Score:5, Informative)
And why is connecting amateur radio equipment to the internet illegal?
Amateur radio operators have been using the internet as a transport and control link for many years. An example of this is Echolink: http://www.echolink.org/ [echolink.org]
Amateur radio connectivity to the internet is not illegal in most if not all of the remaining world. I don't know why France would be any different.
Re:Wait, What? (Score:4, Informative)
I have some dstar gear. Note that there isn't "A" dstar mode. Its more of a family of related modulations and operations, kind of like ISDN was. I'd be interested in knowing which specific modes and types of operation are banned. Or perhaps they all are, under different rules/interpretations.
There's two types of "connect to internet" that dstar gear can do.
1) The numerous VHF/UHF radio repeaters Usually (but not always) are set up connected to the internet to carry voice. There are several competitors that do almost exactly the same thing. Echolink, IRLP, Yaesu's WIREs thing, probably others. If France has banned Echolink, IRLP, etc, then this is the reason. I have an IC-92AD and a IC-800.
2) There is ONE radio ID-1 operating on the 1296 MHz band that, in addition to doing voice, can additionally do a medium speed/medium range IP network. Again, usually connected to the internet at the repeater side, although certainly not always.
Re:Packet Radio is ALREADY on the Internet (Score:3, Informative)
Shouldn't that be 44.0.0.0/8 ?
Re:Where's the petition for to praise the decision (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Wait, What? (Score:5, Informative)
Things forbidden over ham radio in the US:
1) Encryption (Spread spectrum is a bit of a grey area here, some consider it "encryption", also some radio systems use scrambling codes for "whitening" data patterns. In general, "whitening" scramblers were OK as long as they were fully documented, spread spectrum is a pain in the !*@#)!*$#@! regulation-wise)
2) Broadcast is forbidden with a few exceptions. (Repeater IDs, for example. APRS is also kosher. Broadcasting anything like a "radio show" is not. In the digital age it's a bit grey, but in general sustained transmissions are not kosher, but brief bursts (IDing, position reports) are OK.
3) Commercial usage is forbidden. It used to be that if there was ANYTHING commercial about a transmission it was illegal, however a decade or two ago the US changed rules so that it was OK as long as none of the radio operators involved were benefiting financially. The main effect of this difference is that it used to be illegal to order pizza through an autopatcher (Allows a ham to make phone calls from their radio via a gateway, usually located at a repeater site), now it is legal. I think it was primarily done so that hams supporting emergency/even communications could order food for emergency/volunteer event workers. In France they may still use the old-style rules.
Re:Wait, What? (Score:2, Informative)
You can buy a phone and pre-paid minutes in the US for cash.
Some explanation (Score:4, Informative)
French here giving some explanation (all obtained from the document sent by ARCEP. I have no special knowledge on the subject)
In france, you need an authorization from ARCEP to broadcast radio amateur signals.
The article does not says that D-Star is illegal, just that they are not authorizing it on radio amateur.
The reason why they are not authorizing it is that radio amateur can not be connected to any other communication network (By law), except for some temporary pedagical explanation.
In fact radio amateur are design to learn and study about radio signals. Therefore communication over a radio amateur is not permitted.
The bottom line is that this prohibition is only radio amateur signals. If you are licensed, you are not amateur an can do it. If it is not on radio amateur frequencies (such as IP-over-pidgeon or IP-over-yelling as suggested by other slashdotters) then this decision does not apply.
Re:Wait, What? (Score:4, Informative)
You can buy a phone and pre-paid minutes in the US for cash.
Without any ID whatsoever?
Yes. Walk right into walmart / walgreens / target, pick up a prepaid phone, and a prepaid balance card, pay cash, walk out.
I have a prepaid phone, I could do this if I cared to. I use a CC online to "top up" but I am well aware of the marketplace and whats available.
Previous attempts to get rid of this have been blocked by our extremely large illegal alien community as being discriminatory against them. You see, if someone's here illegally either they won't be able to get a contract phone due to complete lack of records, or they'll steal someone elses credit info to get one.
Re:every modulation method can be 'net-connected (Score:3, Informative)
Thank you... that was the joke.
Re:D-Star sucks (Score:3, Informative)
French Fag POV (Score:4, Informative)
1. Internet, the ARCEP warn the HAM operator about the legislation. If you want to run a public telecommunication service you must conform to the pretty heavy legislation about it and it nearly impossible in the HAM environment. Plus HAM frequency aren't supposed to be connect to an open network for non HAM operator use.
2. Cryptografic & National Security, In fact most french HAM operator i know are pretty free software enthusiast and most of them are again proprietary codec and close standard. We have a large number of guys developing mixed HAM/VOIP service with ASTERISK or other kind of crazy stuff. The ARCEP simply said that in the current state of the D-Star standard, It not possible to the ARCEP and other HAM operator to monitor what's going on the frequency.
3. Patents, The standard is cover by many patent and that could be a problem for equal access and monitoring of the frequencies. In short, the ARCEP is again brand specific frequencies and standards for the HAM.
If you can read the ARCEP response letter, the situation is pretty simple. A guy from the DR@F Digital HAM group asked for a authorization for experimental use of the D-Star frequences bands. The ARCEP gave the authorization for 6 months, they asked for up to 10 members authorization they get it and 6 more months. Then they ask for a France wide general authorization for all registered HAM operator. Then the ARCEP politely explain that clearly out of the experimentation range and that clearly another story. For the ARCEP amateur radio group are suppose to be amateur and can't start negotiation for a national wide deployment in place of the manufacturer or consortium behind the standard or the equipment.
D-Star equipment manufacturer need to get in contact with the ARCEP to clarify some issue, like the patent and the possibility of interconnection with an open network ( internet, phone, etc. ). HAM frequence are suppose to be used only by and for registered HAM operator. You couldn't start your own nation wide pager network using HAM frequency.
This seem pretty reasonable to me.
Re:Why now? (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Wait, What? (Score:3, Informative)
Ah a challenge, for this we need the average word length in a standard English text, a = 5.1 character/word;
The speed record in morse code copying, b = 75.2 words/minute ~= 1.2533 words/second;
Average weighted character morse code length (weigthed by relative frequency of the character): c = 2.54167 bits/character
Which gives a speed of a*b*c ~= 16 bit/s.
56k/Morse ~= 3500
Now the problem is you didn't give any baseline to compare the T3 to but assuming you were talking about the comparisson T3 to 56k.
T3 = 44.736 Mbit/s
56k = 56 kbit/s
T3/56k ~= 800
That's really not that far of actually... Just roughly a factor 4, good guess :P. All of these numbers were pulled of wikipedia (or calculated with wikipedia numbers).
Re:no encryption in France (Score:2, Informative)
40bit legilsation was never enforced even by state authority neither the 128bit, they never get an application decree. They are undead law, the law passed trough the chambers but never get used become the government never write an application decree with all the practical implication of the law. In short the law exist but no authority will chase you if you trespass it. It's a weird but common situation.
The situation was clarified in the 2004 law on the digital economy.
The official law text ( gouv.fr = French government )
http://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/html/actualite/actualite_legislative/decrets_application/2004-575.htm [legifrance.gouv.fr]
Article 30
I. - L'utilisation des moyens de cryptologie est libre.
I. - The use of means of cryptology is free.
II. - La fourniture, le transfert depuis ou vers un Etat membre de la Communauté européenne, l'importation et l'exportation des moyens de cryptologie assurant exclusivement des fonctions d'authentification ou de contrôle d'intégrité sont libres.
II. - The supply, transfer to or from a member state of the European Community, import and export of means of cryptology carrying out only functions of Authentication or integrity check are free.
III. - La fourniture, le transfert depuis un Etat membre de la Communauté européenne ou l'importation d'un moyen de cryptologie n'assurant pas exclusivement des fonctions d'authentification ou de contrôle d'intégrité sont soumis à une déclaration préalable auprès du Premier ministre, sauf dans les cas prévus au b du présent III. Le fournisseur ou la personne procédant au transfert ou à l'importation tiennent à la disposition du Premier ministre une description des caractéristiques techniques de ce moyen de cryptologie, ainsi que le code source des logiciels utilisés. Un décret en Conseil d'Etat fixe :
III. - The supply, transfer from a Member State of the European Community or importation of an encryption function that does not ensure only authentication or integrity check are subject to prior declaration to the Prime Minister except in cases provided for in this b III. The provider or person making the transfer or importation give to the Prime Minister a description of the technical characteristics of this form of cryptography, and the source code of the software used. Etc.
Re:Wait, What? (Score:3, Informative)
Ack - wrong! Would you like to try again?
I was an official observer (read ARRL band cop with no teeth) back in the late 80's/early 90's. 97.113 absolutely prohibited ANY type of business use back then. The rules were changed in the early 90's to allow this type of exception (along with ham related swap-nets) as an example.
So there was a time when it wasn't legal. It is now.
Re:France is a laughing stock for the whole world (Score:3, Informative)
Care to read the article you link to?
Re:Wait, What? (Score:2, Informative)
What have you tried to purchase / do that required ID?
Beer
What's this crap about "bribes"? (Score:4, Informative)
Arcep is a public service that does a good job overall. They have been single-handedly (well, pushed by the European Commission) responsible for opening up the local copper loop to competition, and as a result propelling us into the top 5 for broadband speed and availability. At the same time, the Bush FCC, thanks to Verizon-ATT-cable "political contributions", which are but in name only *actual* bribes, made sure no such competition happened in the US.
Re:Project to replace the proprietary codec (Score:2, Informative)
Yes, this is really the big issue, how to get digital modes where everything is open. After all the point of amateur radio is the self-training aspect of building and operating equipment.
The AMBE codec is proprietary and cannot even be reverse-engineered as the protocol and format itself is protected by patents.
Radio amateurs should abandon it (the performance is fairly poor too) and replace it with something that complies with the spirit of the licence.
Do please go and donate some money to David Rowe, it's better than giving it to Icom and losing your freedom.
Re:Wait, What? (Score:3, Informative)
in most walmart like stores in small town's, the security it up to the local manager depending on need. as most stores only see a few hundred people a day, they often pass on video security.
just because it's hard to get something in a store in DETROIT, doesn't mean that you can't drive an hour to JACKSON and get the same product for the same price, without somebody even so much as coughing at you, let alone MIND if you clear out the rack of 12+ identical mobile phones.
Re:Wait, What? (Score:3, Informative)
Back in the old times, that is around 1980, I used a 4 speed tape recorder to decode high speed morse code signals on the VHF bands during meteor showers. Meteorites entering the ionosphere briefly made the E-layer reflective for frequencies on the 2 meter and 70 cm band.
Prearranged attempts at a QSO made it possible to go for speeds of 1600 WPM or more, thus packing the relevant QSO information into a 1 second burst or less. Well, you needed to copy 200 WPM to do that, but us old farts had no problem with that.
Peter, DF5JT