Why Google, Bing, Yahoo Should Fear ACTA 290
littlekorea writes "US intellectual property law expert Jonathan Band has warned that Silicon Valley's search engines, hosting companies, and e-commerce giants have much to fear from the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement, negotiations for which continued in Switzerland today. The fear for search engines in particular is the erosion of 'fair use' protections and introduction of statutory damages, both of which could lead to more copyright claims from rights holders." The article links a marked-up ACTA draft (PDF) that Band and a coalition of library organizations and rights groups believe is more balanced. Quoting Band: "Our high-level concern is that ACTA does not reflect the balance in US IP law, [which] contains strong protections and strong exceptions. ACTA exports only the strong protections, but not the strong exceptions."
Re:The untimely war on filesharing. (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:The untimely war on filesharing. (Score:5, Interesting)
My failure to buy is not because I cannot afford to. It is not because I don't want to give my money to such jerks. It is because I just can't be bothered to find out whether the product they are selling is good enough to spend my money on.
Re:The Ratchet Effect (Score:3, Interesting)
ACTA highlights the fundamental problem with politics (in the U.S.) today.
Implying that only the US is the driving force behind ACTA. This would be false. The Japanese and their conglomerates are just as much pushing for ACTA as any corporation in the US.
Re:The untimely war on filesharing. (Score:3, Interesting)
Nope. The problem is that they spend the $200 on their iPhones or DVDs.
DVD sales are up, cinema attendence is continually breaking records, Apple is selling millions of iPhones ... something has to give, and that 'something' is the thing which is easiest to copy/get for free, ie. music.
I do agree 100% with the sentiment that even if the RIAA gets every law and every copy protection it can possibly dream up it won't make any more money than it's making now. People aren't going to put down their iPods and stop going to the cinema with their friends just so they can have another CD on their shelf.
OTOH ... the world will be a far worse place to live in if we let them do it.
Re:The untimely war on filesharing. (Score:2, Interesting)
As you get older you care less and less about the latest movies and music.. That might explain your change of behavior more than anything else.
Re:Fuck Them All (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:The untimely war on filesharing. (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:The untimely war on filesharing. (Score:3, Interesting)
I feel that if they managed to get the torrent sites shut down...
I'm not sure they can. They've been trying for the last ten years and the site just went offshore.
If they sue enough users and/or get enough Internet connections disconnected, another, more encrypted, less trackable system will spring up to replace the torrents. It already happened three or four times - Napster, eDonkey, Gnutella, etc. were all replaced by newer, less lawyerable protocols.
Re:The untimely war on filesharing. (Score:2, Interesting)
http://www.guardian.co.uk/music/2009/apr/21/study-finds-pirates-buy-more-music [guardian.co.uk]
The rest of these articles link back to the studies they quote. They are basically information that states how piracy has actually helped industries to make money.
Piracy is good:
http://www.mindjack.com/feature/piracy051305.html [mindjack.com]
http://moreintelligentlife.com/story/internet-piracy-is-good-for-films-1 [moreintelligentlife.com]
http://torrentfreak.com/why-most-artists-profit-from-piracy/ [torrentfreak.com]
http://www.thebookseller.com/news/99958-toc-piracy-may-boost-sales-research-suggests.html [thebookseller.com]
Re:The untimely war on filesharing. (Score:3, Interesting)
They probably cost them about as much as the home cassette recorder cost them in the 1980s. WHen I was a student twin tape decks were the norm and most people had shelves stacked high with copied tapes in their dorm rooms.
They weathered that one by ... offering consumers something much nicer, shinier, and more convenient, ie. CDs. CDs were expensive but people bought them anyway because they were desirable.
So...it's not just about money and getting things for free, it's about convenience and desirability.
Right now the pirates are offering a service which is both more convenient *and* more desirable then what the RIAA is offering, ie. no DRM to prevent you playing it wherever you want to, you don't have to have a full album, just the song you heard on the radio, you can edit your current 'mixtape' in seconds, etc.
Apple is listening to what consumers really want (ie. iPods and immediate access to *everything* with listen-before-you-buy ability) and they're doing Ok.
The stick-in-the-mud RIAA with its shops full of 1990's-era, mostly-filler CDs? Not so much.
Re:The untimely war on filesharing. (Score:1, Interesting)
Here's an excuse: if you're young and don't control the credit card yet.
Remember the Humble Indie Bundle? I could buy a bunch of nice games for.. one friggin' cent, if I wanted. But I was thinking of giving five bucks, perhaps ten.
So I asked mom for the credit card.
"Do you think money grows on trees? Just pirate it."
Fucked up, eh? And that from someone who often gives to charity!
Re:The untimely war on filesharing. (Score:3, Interesting)
Actually - only the sucky games drop below $5 (new). Greatest Hits games usually hang-around $20. Look at Final Fantasy 7 - been out for fifteen years and yet still sells for $19.99 new.
I avoid downloadable games. Why? You can't resell them and recover your money, after you finish playing them.