China Rejects US Piracy Claims As "Groundless" 302
eldavojohn writes "Earlier this month, a United States piracy list fingered China, Russia, and Canada as the first, second and third worst governments (respectively) for enforcing copyright policy in the world. China's Foreign Ministry has rejected these claims as 'groundless' just before meeting with Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner on Monday and Tuesday in Beijing to address copyright policy. The official Chinese statement read, 'The involved US Congress members should respect the fact and stop making groundless accusations against China.' The plan nevertheless remains to use the visit to pressure China into overhauling its failed attempts to curb piracy, since software piracy in China appears to be a social norm, with the Chinese government possibly even leading by example."
As compared to what? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:FOSS (Score:3, Insightful)
I praise the Chinese government for standing up against U.S. corporations pushing their desires through their puppets.
Re:With all the knockoffs and piracy that does go (Score:3, Insightful)
Then what exactly is made during the third or "ghost" shift in China, not at the request of any outside company?
Another thing of note, explain all the pirated movies and software that gets sold in that country (or is that always "Not from our family" or from someone out of favor?).
The only thing that's groundless is China's posturing.
Yeah, and what exactly are Americans downloading from The Pirate Bay or LimeWire? Linux ISOs? Maybe the US should be on that list, too. Oh, and all the Americans dealing drugs? Clearly the US is doing nothing to stop them.
Fun fact: People break laws. It's hardly something to blame either government for (and whether or not the laws are just is a whole different question entirely).
Re:FOSS (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Afica?!? (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:As compared to what? (Score:5, Insightful)
The US position is understandable (Score:5, Insightful)
The US position is understandable as is the position of the rest of the world.
The US is gearing itself more and more to an IP economy, sell knowledge/ideas rather then the products themselves. Apple thinks of the iPod and gets paid for this idea while the actual production and shipping can be done somewhere else. The US is not involved at all in a iPod sold in Holland. So how does Apple ensure it gets paid if not with the enforcement of the concept of IP that tells people you can't just copy their design?
With software and media content, who cares who made it originally? Despite claims by MS that copies of its software have malware pre-installed (they must be thinking of Sony's PC, that now come with a paid for feature to get a clean install) the fact is that I can save myself a lot of money by just heading over to the piratebay for my game PC. (And yes I do still buy games, just not the OS and no I don't care about a raid because I got dozens of licenses lying around from machines that got liberated with the help of the penguin)
And for me, a MS license is not all that expensive for someone living on minimum income, in a nation where a license can come close to a months or even years wages... well the choice is even easier.
The US by continuing to turn into a knowledge only culture (describing the US as a knowledge culture, I am going to have to hand in my EU citizen card for this one) is doing the samething the Brits did pre-WW2. "Why should we produce our own food when we can have foreigners do this for us cheaper and can then use our country side for hunting instead". Capital idea, except that nasty Mr Hitler threw a spanner in the works by sinking the ships bringing in the food. What a rotter.
The knowledge/IP economy only works when everyone is willing to play along. It is easy to argue that everyone benefits but clearly not everyone seems to agree. With a physical goods economy (the one the US got really really big on) it is easier to force people to play along. You can just stop shipments if someone breaks the rules. And it is rather hard to steal 1000tons of goods. Just ask the somali pirates what happens to you when you try to steal US cargo. "TRIPLE SYNCHRONIZED HEADSHOT!" (in Unreal commentator voice). And that is if you are a lucky pirate. The russian put some in a rubber boat that just somehow managed to sink... well worse things happen at sea, especially if you upset russians.
But IP? You don't even have to go to the source, the "victim" just happily sends it to you. If the US wants to sell a DVD in China, it got to send the DVD and then just anyone can copy it/steal it. It is an insane system to rely on for your economy. You don't see Shell going around filling everyone's gas tank then hoping they will pay up?
What is China's motivation for respecting US IP? So that money from its economy floats to the west? How does that aid them? (Well it would allow the US to at least start paying some of its massive debts back) The US is banking its economy on a sector were you really depend on the kindness of strangers. Which seems odd since that is not really what capitalists are best at.
When Germany declared war on Britian, they had to spend a fortune on submarines to attempt to "sink" the UK's economy. If China were to declare war, all it would need to do is stop payments for IP. Oh and stop sending goods. No need to sink cargo vessels, just not let them sail anymore. The battle for the pacific would be won with a piece of paper. What would the US do, bomb Chinese ports to force the sunken ships to sail? Block Chinese banks so the money for IP couldn't be transferred even more?
An IP based economy relies far to much on the recognition that IP has to be paid for and to anyone who doesn't have IP that recognition has no positive sides. China/Russia/Canada/EU/Africa do not gain anything from recognizing US IP. Sure, they probably play along because their politicians either want to keep the peace or are corrupted by lobbyists, but how long will that
Re:As compared to what? (Score:2, Insightful)
The US don't want to enforce copyright, they want to reduce everyone's privacy rights. This copyright BS clearly hides an agenda of controlling everyone everywhere.
Free trade and Hulu, Pandora, Netflix... (Score:2, Insightful)
When legitimate American companies deny with IP blocking access to Canadians what other solutions are there ? I can buy CDs from Amazon yet MP3 have been blocked from downloading some weeks after the service was introduced after I had already bought several hard to find albums. Many American companies will go as far as saying they don't ship 'overseas' when blocking Canada, which is funny considering Hawaii or Alaska is further away than 90% of the Canadian population
Sorry but fuck the US then (Score:5, Insightful)
We Canadians are abiding by our laws just as well as any other country in the world, including the US. Its just that the US Media conglomerates have not succeeded in shoving their idea of strict IP laws down our throats yet, despite their best efforts at bribing our officials. As a result, we see entirely biased bullshit like this announced.
I am sure that in China there is a problem with recognizing the rediculous way that patents and IP are being treated. People are copying technology and selling it and thats probably a real problem for US companies that rely on obedience to US laws to enforce their business models. I can imagine that some of the same is going on in Russia. But Canada? What is the possible origin of lumping Canada in there? Could it be that we have a (gasp) different understanding of fair use and so far (despite our "Conservative" government) have stuck to our guns and maintained our stance? I pay an extra few bucks every time I buy data CDs - why? Because that money is (theoretically at least) being collected to compensate Canadian artists should I choose to do something that infringes on their rights - even if all I actually do is, you know, use them to store data/do backups. Its legal in Canada to download music you don't own I am told (I don't listen to more than a few songs a year on my computer and I think I have a total of 12 mp3s on my system), its just illegal to upload it. I suspect that our stance on fair use, and unwillingness to just roll over and take it up the ass from US companies is the origin of the inclusion of Canada on this list.
Well fuck them then.
Re:FOSS (Score:3, Insightful)
It's copyright law that makes the GPL enforceable. Without it, there would be a lot less source code around, things would become public domain once the source code was released. Companies would have to guard their source code much more closely.
Without copyright law the GPL would be unnecessary. Even if companies guarded their source code, there would be no downside to reverse engineering. That would give consumers more choice and lower prices.
The original intent of copyright and patent law was to give creators incentive to create by giving them a temporary monopoly. All of the copyright extension laws have turned that into a de facto permanent monopoly. Just look at how much the field has changed in the last 27 years, the original duration for copyrights -- there is no indication that software needs such incentives, and lots of indications that without the artificial barrier the field would be moving even faster than it already does.
International Piracy Rights (Score:1, Insightful)
"...may unfairly disadvantage U.S. IPR holders," Kirk said, using the acronym for international piracy rights."
It's not about stopping piracy, it's about making sure only companies can pirate.
Re:FOSS (Score:1, Insightful)
As a proud Canadian I can say the following... (Score:3, Insightful)
Wiki \/
A blank media levy was introduced in Canada in 1997, by the addition of Part VIII, "Private Copying", to the Canadian Copyright Act.
On every blank CD or DVD I have bought in the past seven years or so! That's about 1000 DVD's. I'm a photographer backing up MY OWN WORK. And still paying a copyright fee because I May have copied. Lame fucking shit. American lobbyists stay the fuck away from my parliament!
What joke (Score:3, Insightful)
We can't pressure China to do anything unless we are willing to risk total warefar with them. All they have to do is threaten a minor hiccup in treasury purchases and we just lost our testicles. Oh and don't go with they need us just as much as we need them economically crap. No they don't. They have a rising rest of Asia, Russian Federation, Europe and India to sell cheap stuff to. Oh yes it would slow them down a great deal but not like what it would do to us; not at all.
Re:As compared to what? (Score:1, Insightful)
A link to a link? C'mon. Even US law has difficulty penalizing this. What's next? Link to a link to a link?
Difference between Google results and mp3.baidu.com: Baidu takes zero steps to discourage infringement - in fact, they encourage it - and AFAIK have no means for people or copyright holders to take down these results.
See:
Google Search / DMCA [google.com]
Google Blogger infringement report [google.com]
Re:As compared to what? (Score:5, Insightful)
Ya know.....
I think whoever accused Canada as 3rd worst is a real asshole. Canada DOES have relevant laws about piracy - they collect approximately 1% per blank cassette, CD, or DVD sold, put that money in a central fund, and use that fund to provide financial backing for artists. That's Canadian law. That's the solution they chose and exercised for the last ~30 years.
Now maybe the Congresscritters don't like that law, but last I checked Canada is not a US protectorate. (Unless they are secretly planning to turn the provinces into states 51 to 60). I think it's about time the European Union, the British Commonwealth, and BRIC step-up and tell Washington DC to "Shut up!"
As for the Chinese dude, he's obviously lying but at the same time I think he's taking the right approach - "We're not your serfs. You will not boss us around."
Canada (Score:1, Insightful)
It's not that we are the 3rd worst country in the world to enforce copyright policy... It's that we are the 3rd worst country in the world for enforcing the US version of copyright policy... We follow our policies just fine, thank you, and there really is no need to modify the regulations, except I DO think that a levy should be imposed upon iPods and similar devices. Screw what the US wants... Look at the mess they are in now, and if that ship is sinking, I sure as hell don't feel like drowning because of them...
Re:As compared to what? (Score:3, Insightful)
And notice that it's the US definition of copyright that is broken, not necessarily the local copyright regulations.
Anyway - when copyright crimes are high on the list of pursued and punishable crimes while other crimes still exists in large volumes is that not an indication of a legal system that is going down the drain?
you are correct, it's the cost (Score:5, Insightful)
1.25 USD per disc
That the main point and why so called "piracy" is also rampant in these various other nations. These media distributors are seriously price gouging, they have some insane idea of what their "copies" are allegedly worth, so the market routes around their idiocy. And everyone knows it. If they made these copies closer to that chinese knock off price, that is also closer to a "fair" price for duplication copies using today's tech. They could make up the difference on volume sales. Instead, 20 bucks a disk, DRM, warnings, etc, then bitch up and down and sideways over piracy.
I mean..duh
Back when making a physical copy actually cost a whole lot more, charging an appropriate price was fair and understandable. This is not the case now, especially with digital downloads, let alone what everyone knows is the price for blank media and making copies in bulk. The **AA cartel just needs to get seriously real on prices, they should have done it years ago. What they charge to *rent* a disk they could afford to just outright sell it, and still make good profit, especially if they kept the packaging costs low. Just stick them in cheap printed paper sleeves, sell for a few bucks, at least have that option. If people wanted the full jewel case and liner notes, swell, charge another couple of bucks, up to but not exceeding five dollars. $20 for a disk is out to lunch, 99 cents for a few megs download is out to lunch as well, the old "allofmp3" prices were a lot fairer.
And yes, to nip the indignant knee jerk reaction in advance, I am fully aware of production costs. That's not the point, they are carved in stone, called a sunk price, after that you want to sell as many copies as possible to make your profit. "Oh noes, I need to charge twenty for this stamped disk to make money, plus this is "what the market will bear". Nope, incorrect again, this is why there is so much piracy, the "market" mostly thinks 20 bucks for a disk is ludicrous, it is *not* bearing it except in way high paid a few nations and only a small subset in those nations. Look again at the parent post, a buck 25 is closer to what the global market of 6.5 billion people can afford. A small fraction of your potential market has enough disposable cash (now, watch as the economy keeps tanking...) to think 20 is cool, the vast bulk of humanity thinks anyone-you the media copy seller are nuts and will not pay that price, and they don't. It's been the collective global big finger to those sort of bloated prices.
Stop price gouging on non scarce and very cheap resources, see what happens.
Comment removed (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:As compared to what? (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Why ? (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:As compared to what? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:you are correct, it's the cost (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:As compared to what? (Score:3, Insightful)
I suppose if we have to live next door to a superpower then the US is by far the best choice. However, that the US is a superpower means that it is a de facto bully and imposes its version of right and wrong on its neighbours and the world.
In Canada, our sane banking rules have been credited with the fact that *no* bank went under during this recession. Despite this, the US wants a global banking tax, which Canada doesn't need and which would have the effect of penalizing Canadian banks for being prudent.
In Canada, up to now drug enforcement efforts -- although unreasonably restrictive -- are models of restraint compared to US actions that would have comfortably fitted into Nazi Germany. With the arrogant assumption that what is good for the US is good for the world, America strong-arms its neighbours to support drug interdiction despite the cost of lives, property, jobs and individual liberty.
The parent posting refers to the US imprisonment of marijuana legalization advocate, and Canadian hero, Marc Emery. For years, Emery has been a leading spokesman and political advocate for this cause. Not unlike Ghandi, Emery has personally put himself on the line for his beliefs. He has been jailed several times for openly infringing drug laws and his pot store raided. His commitment, however, to the cause has contributed to increased tolerance towards drugs, particularly in his hometown of Vancouver, BC., where people smoking a joint will not normally be arrested unless they are doing some other illegal act. Emery's growing success, however, at changing Canadian attitudes towards marijuana has only served to anger US officials. His arrest at their behest, and his extradition to the States and imprisonment amount to a gross interference in Canada's internal debate on drugs.
Finally, US pandering to its Disney overlords means that once again it is putting the squeeze on Canada. For all that the US and Canada are said to be the best of neighbours with the longest undefended border in the world, there is a ton of resentment building north of the border. One can get along with a bully, but one can never truly be friends with one. If the US keeps doing what it's doing to us, the day may come when it will stand alone.
Re:you are correct, it's the cost (Score:2, Insightful)
That may seem fair in your region of the world, but it is ludicrously over-priced elsewhere.
Over priced compared to what? The pirated copies? Letting people who infringe copyright dictate price point is not a good idea.
In the UK a new release DVD can be anywhere between £10 and £15; a trip to the cinema for 4 people can be upward of £35. I'd say the price point for a DVD that you can keep, share, re-sell etc, is about right. Sure it would be nice if it was cheaper.
At the end of the day these companies have costs, risks, and an obligation to make huge profits. Do other manufacturers listen when you tell them to reduce prices and make less profit?