Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
Image

TSA Worker Jailed In Body Scan Rage Incident 352

Posted by samzenpus
from the checking-out-your-package dept.
A TSA worker in Miami was arrested for aggravated battery after he attacked a co-worker for making fun of the size of his genitals. Rolando Negrin walked through one of the new body scanners during a recent training session and a supervisor started making fun of his manhood. From the article: "According to the police report, Negrin confronted one of his co-workers in an employee parking lot, where he hit him with a police baton on the arm and back."

*

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

TSA Worker Jailed In Body Scan Rage Incident

Comments Filter:
  • by Nukenbar (215420) on Friday May 07, 2010 @02:34PM (#32131862)

    I'm not sure I wanted to click on that link..

  • by 2names (531755) on Friday May 07, 2010 @02:35PM (#32131884)
    The attacker said, "my rod feels pretty damn big now, doesn't it? [thump] Huh? [whack] You like this big rod? [thump whack]"
  • by wiredog (43288) on Friday May 07, 2010 @02:36PM (#32131896) Journal

    Bring bratwurst when flying.

  • by Locke2005 (849178) on Friday May 07, 2010 @02:44PM (#32132020)
    The story IS about your right to not be laughed at for having an itty-bitty, tiny little pecker -- an issue that is of utmost importance to many slashdot readers (myself excluded, of course!)
  • May 7th (Score:5, Funny)

    by iamhassi (659463) on Friday May 07, 2010 @02:45PM (#32132042) Journal
    Alright May 7th 2010, who had May 7th as the date a TSA worker would get arrested for something related to the new body scanners? .... Anyone? ..... come on people, I have 454 comments [slashdot.org] of people saying this is a Very Bad Idea, someone had to have May 7th....
  • by Bobfrankly1 (1043848) on Friday May 07, 2010 @02:49PM (#32132092)

    This system has been in place for quite some time now.

    If you have flow recently, you probably walked through one.

    So the system is only for girls?

  • by Monkeedude1212 (1560403) on Friday May 07, 2010 @02:52PM (#32132146) Journal

    Welcome newcommer!

    We enjoy having new recruits at our site, slashdot. I am one of our sites many moderators, so that means I'm super important. Don't upset us or we'll downmod you. You have been warned. Back to the welcome message!

    I see that you are unfamiliar with how editors handle messages at Slashdot. It's a proprietary method, since we love Microsoft, its also open source, like Linux, and it also makes no sense, like Apple. There are various categories in which a story might be filed under. When a submitter submits a story, they put in what category they believe it to be under, and other tags that might help in its placement. Slashdot editors take a look at the category, and give it a 50% chance of being filed in there. Then the editors look at the stats of the submitter. This includes Kharma, previous story entries, upmodded comments, skill in grammar, and other various related fields. They use these stats to come up with a 1x, 2x, or 3x* modifier. The Editors then roll a D-20, and multiply the value to the modifier, and add it as a percentage to the total to the previously mentioned 50%. They then create a pie chart in excel with the proper category being proportional to the new percentage. All other categories divide the remaining space. Using a random number Generator, they generate a number between 1 and 100. Where the number lands determines which category the article is placed under, based on the ranges previously defined.

    And thats it! Simple right? I know, I didn't know how it worked when I first got here either, but when once someone tells you, you kind of look back at how silly you were for not seeing it before.

    Welcome to slashdot, and thank you for posting.

  • by OzPeter (195038) on Friday May 07, 2010 @02:54PM (#32132178)

    Bring bratwurst when flying.

    Protip .. watch This is Spinal Tap [wikipedia.org] for what to do at airports

  • by Monkeedude1212 (1560403) on Friday May 07, 2010 @02:54PM (#32132190) Journal

    Almost forgot,

    *In cases with a 3x* modifier, where a value higher than 17 is rolled, that would instantly put it inside the category, and the remaining steps can be ignored.

    **In the case of KDawson submitting a story, the modifier is automatically 0x, and gets only a 50% of getting it right, since his stories can hardly be considered good to begin with.

  • by SpectreHiro (961765) on Friday May 07, 2010 @02:57PM (#32132230) Homepage

    Nah, I think I'll wave my rights there. I frequently have a good belly laugh about my comically under-sized wang; why shouldn't everyone else?

  • by TofuDog (735357) on Friday May 07, 2010 @03:31PM (#32132836)
    By "kids", do you mean they can see the little swimmers inside of the tiny genitalia?
  • by iamhassi (659463) on Friday May 07, 2010 @03:33PM (#32132858) Journal
    National Lampoon's Vacation 2010

    (teenage daughter walks through scanner)
    TSA man: (previously bored, now looks suddenly excited) Um, ma'am, I'm going to need you to go back through the scanner (reaching in pocket)
    Daughter: (rolling eyes) Fine whatever (walks back in)
    TSA man: (pulls cellphone out of pocket, taking pictures of screen) Yeah that's good, stop right there and slowly turn around.
    (daughter turning)
    (another TSA man walks over)
    2nd TSA man: Wow! (reaches in pocket, pulls out cellphone, snaps photos)
    (daughter still turning, crowd of TSA employees gather, all taking photos and mumbles of approval)
    Father: is everything ok?
    TSA man: Um, yeah, but I'm going to need your daughter's cell phone number in case we find something later after reviewing the scan in more detail.
    (daughter exits scanner)
    Father: is that necessary?
    TSA man: (looking stern) Oh? Do we have a problem here? (motions towards two armed airport security guards)
    Father: (looking suprised) NO No, no problem at all! Here's her number, call anytime
    TSA man: (looking satisfied) Thank you for complying. Who's next?
    (people in line look worryingly at each other as if no one wants to go, one person lowers head and begrudgingly steps forward toward the scanner)
  • by Saroful (1364377) on Friday May 07, 2010 @03:33PM (#32132866)

    "You fly to Europe or Canada, and their security personnel have a clue - they're practical, they keep a sharp eye out, and they use the right response for the situation at hand."

    The problem is that here in the U.S. we have to be oh so politically correct at all times. We have to treat 74 year old white-haired grandmothers *exactly* the same way as we treat 20-something guys with a bread and a strong middle-eastern accent when everyone knows that the odds of someone from either of these two groups doing something harmful on a flight are massively skewed towards the latter group.

    I think the potential threat of the latter group would depend on what type of bread that 20-something middle-eastern guy has. Pita? Not too worrisome. White? Not too bad. Whole wheat? A little unnerving. French? Time for the full body scan.

  • Re:May 7th (Score:3, Funny)

    by frosty_tsm (933163) on Friday May 07, 2010 @03:44PM (#32133014)

    I had May 7th. Where do I claim my prize?

    Please proceed to the body-scanner archive room.

  • by couchslug (175151) on Friday May 07, 2010 @04:05PM (#32133178)

    "The whole purpose of the scanners to emasculate and demean the people who pass through them. This should be clear to everyone."

    Too late, I'm already married.

  • by Anonymous Coward on Friday May 07, 2010 @05:59PM (#32133714)

    "As a former TSA screener..."

    Former TSA screener, eh? Would that happen to be your photo at the top of this story? ;-p

  • by shutdown -p now (807394) on Friday May 07, 2010 @06:42PM (#32134014) Journal

    The best part is that this story plays nicely with one opinion about such institutions, popular here and there ...

    I kinda expected the follow-up to be "... , that TSA workers have small dicks". ~

Old programmers never die, they just branch to a new address.

Working...