Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Image

Son Sues Mother Over Facebook Posts 428

Most kids hate having their parents join in on a discussion on Facebook, but one 16-year-old in Arkansas hates it so much he has filed suit against his mother, charging her with harassment. From the article: "An Arkadelphia mother is charged with harassment for making entries on her son's Facebook page. Denise New's 16-year-old son filed charges against her last month and requested a no-contact order after he claims she posted slanderous entries about him on the social networking site. New says she was just trying to monitor what he was posting." Seems like he could just unfriend her.

*

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Son Sues Mother Over Facebook Posts

Comments Filter:
  • by quantumplacet ( 1195335 ) on Wednesday April 07, 2010 @03:04PM (#31764930)

    RTFA, his grandparents have custodial rights, not his mother.

  • Re:Alternatives (Score:3, Informative)

    by Lunix Nutcase ( 1092239 ) on Wednesday April 07, 2010 @03:07PM (#31764980)

    I suppose simply unfriending her would not be feasible. (Maybe she'd take away his computer if he tried or punish him or something)

    The kid lives with his grandmother and the mother has no custodial rights. That would make it a little hard for the mom to punish him in any way.

  • You really should read the articles before posting comments. The mother didn't have custody. If she hacked, that's not just a tort, that's a crime. Possibly federal, if they are in different states.
  • by Millennium ( 2451 ) on Wednesday April 07, 2010 @03:14PM (#31765114)

    So at first I felt like the kid was overreacting. Parents (or those in loco parentis, which I'll get to in a moment) have a legitimate need-to-know when it comes to what's going on in their kids' lives.

    However, according to the article, this kid's mom doesn't have custody. The grandparents do, and so this doesn't seem to be due to divorce or other "ordinary" situations that would cause a parent to lose custody of their own kids. In other words, something is seriously messed up here, and so while the fact that this is a mother/son thing is good for grabbing ratings, it's not really all that relevant to the matter at hand.

    Moral of the story: RTFA.

  • by Shakrai ( 717556 ) on Wednesday April 07, 2010 @03:27PM (#31765338) Journal

    I mean, if they whack them...the kid can call child services on them.

    That doesn't mean child services will do anything about it. It's legal here in New York State (hardly a bastion of cultural conservatism) to hit your kids:

    35.10 Justification; use of physical force generally. The use of physical force upon another person which would otherwise constitute an offense is justifiable and not criminal under any of the following circumstances:

    1. A parent, guardian or other person entrusted with the care and supervision of a person under the age of twenty-one or an incompetent person, and a teacher or other person entrusted with the care and supervision of a person under the age of twenty-one for a special purpose, may use physical force, but not deadly physical force, upon such person when and to the extent that he reasonably believes it necessary to maintain discipline or to promote the welfare of such person.

  • Stupid woman (Score:5, Informative)

    by Locke2005 ( 849178 ) on Wednesday April 07, 2010 @03:33PM (#31765420)
    Half of the comments on that article are by Ms. New herself. Obviously she hasn't hired a lawyer yet, because the first thing a lawyer would do is tell her to STFU... she isn't making herself look like any more fit a parent by showing her ass in public in all these postings... and they're probably admissible in court as evidence that she is continuing to harass and slander her son!
  • Re:Alternatives (Score:4, Informative)

    by Davey McDave ( 926282 ) <psychodave@gmailFREEBSD.com minus bsd> on Wednesday April 07, 2010 @03:36PM (#31765486) Homepage

    A case of RTFA in this case, a careless untruthful comment on the summary.

    "In a document from the Clark County prosecutor, he alleges she hacked his account, changed his password and posted things that involve slander about his personal life."

    The posts weren't from her account on his statuses or whatever, it sounds like she actually went onto HIS account and posted slanderous things in his name (or at least, that is what is being accused). Sounds a little more serious now.

  • by Imrik ( 148191 ) on Wednesday April 07, 2010 @03:38PM (#31765538) Homepage

    She allegedly hacked into his account and made posts from it so no, he can't just block her.

  • by Locke2005 ( 849178 ) on Wednesday April 07, 2010 @03:46PM (#31765690)
    The mom is NOT the custodial parent... did you RTFA?
  • by Lunix Nutcase ( 1092239 ) on Wednesday April 07, 2010 @03:48PM (#31765720)

    Democrats have pledged to work with RIAA and MPAA to protect the TV/movie industry's productions.

    I hate to break it to you but the RIAA and MPAA also have republicans on their side. You remember that little law called the DMCA? Do you know from which party came the congressman who introduced the bill? The republican party. Do you know the current political affiliation of the current RIAA president? Republican again. If you think the Republicans aren't just as much in the pockets of the RIAA and MPAA you're even more dumb then you come across now.

  • by Jaysyn ( 203771 ) on Wednesday April 07, 2010 @03:56PM (#31765862) Homepage Journal

    All depends on the state you're living in. In Florida it's completely legal to physically discipline your child.

    Fla. Stat. Ann. 39.01(2), (30)(f), (45) (West, WESTLAW through End of 2003 Reg. Sess.)

    Corporal discipline of a child by a parent, legal custodian, or caregiver for disciplinary purposes does not in itself constitute abuse when it does not result in harm to the child.

    You just can't beat them till you leave bruises or welts. If you use a wide enough paddle, this won't happen because of the surface area. My parents used to use a cut down boat oar. Hurt like a mofo, but never left marks.

    I wonder if there is any correlation between states that have outlawed physically disciplining minors & instances of youth offenders?

  • by BobMcD ( 601576 ) on Wednesday April 07, 2010 @04:28PM (#31766534)

    I'd deal with them by denying access to the computer at my house and grounding them unless they deleted their account permanently or cleaned it up.

    "Uh, hi, DFS? I know this guy who tortures his kid by denying all access to her friends. He's making her a social pariah because he's a total psycho. I wouldn't be surprised if he makes her strip naked in front of him to make sure she isn't hiding a cell phone. The address is..."

  • Re:No contact. (Score:5, Informative)

    by Shakrai ( 717556 ) on Wednesday April 07, 2010 @04:28PM (#31766536) Journal

    Stop being so selfish, and let someone called to this line of work have your position.

    I didn't say I was direct care. I'm the IT person at my particular agency. You couldn't pay me enough to work in a direct care role. If I did work in such a role I would have been arrested a long time ago for beating the shit out of some "parent" that abused one of my clients.

  • by Anubis IV ( 1279820 ) on Wednesday April 07, 2010 @05:19PM (#31767504)
    If you read through the comments on TFA, the mother actually starts responding. Supposedly, she had a mental breakdown (her failure to grasp the English language might have been her first clue) after going through a nasty divorce with her husband, followed up shortly thereafter by a fire in the house where she and her son were living. As a result, the son is now in the custody of his paternal grandmother, he hasn't seen the father in a number of years, the father isn't paying support, and the son apparently has a history of behavioral problems (the mother cited issues with truancy, drugs, and traffic violations, amongst others). She readily admits that she accessed his account from her computer after he had left it logged onto Facebook.

    Moral of the story: The family was broken and crazy before. Nothing has changed.
  • Re:The real question (Score:5, Informative)

    by WCguru42 ( 1268530 ) on Wednesday April 07, 2010 @05:28PM (#31767660)

    The place I see "racism" is in the very idea of the assumption that anyone from the south deserves to be denigrated and disrespected automatically

    First, that assumption would be correct. Second, the word you're looking for is douche-baggery, not racism.

  • Re:The real question (Score:2, Informative)

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday April 07, 2010 @06:25PM (#31768440)
    I'm still trying to figure out how this mother can successfully type a password. (Check the comments on the article, a sample is quoted below.)

    The son apparently left his Facebook account logged in at the mother's house, so she changed his password and started impersonating him. Computer crime aside, I can definitely see why the son was appalled at having this type of comment associated with his name.

    !st of all...even tho she has legal cust...that has never mattered b4. I hired an atty for him when he was hit by a DD...I signed all the paper work not his grandmother...they had no prob with me not being his guardian when he got busted with pot....I delt with his atty for that and the same prosecutor that has filed this. It didnt matter that I wasnt his legal guardian when he was skipping school...I was the the school called. They cannot pick n choose when i should be in his life and when I shouldnt. My son has had a long list of behaviorial problem for awhile now. He not only endangers himself but other kids as well. Furthermore I didnt HACK into anything...he left his FB loggied in ON MY COMPUTER....and me having his password was a given if he wanted to use my computer. I HAVE EVERY RIGHT TO MONITOR HIM.....just b/c i dont have custody doesnt mean i dont care...and maybe if grandmother was doing her JOB I WOULDNT HAVE TO!

  • by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday April 07, 2010 @07:54PM (#31769532)

    I think this is referring to Barry Cooper of Never Get Busted.

    juicy bits from the police report:
    "The 14-year-old has drug posters in her room along with imitation marijuana items."
    "Parents are unsuitable and create an environment where the children believe the government is out to harm them."
    7-year-old child with cerebral palsy was engaged in "outburst" of "Crying Excessively" for "no reason observed during the execution of a search warrant at the residence."
    Barry Cooper "does not believe in church" and "hates his father"
    "The children are being mentally abused to believe drugs are good."
    "The family will not allow any government employee into the home without court orders."

    so really, the kid got taken away because of marijuana and other complete bullshit reasons
    http://stash.norml.org/kopbusters-barry-cooper-and-wife-lose-son-over-misdemeanor-marijuana-charge

To the systems programmer, users and applications serve only to provide a test load.

Working...