US House Passes P2P Ban On Federal Networks 91
An anonymous reader writes "Recently, the US House of Representatives passed a bill in an attempt to ban peer-to-peer file-sharing applications on federal computers and networks. Similar bills have been proposed before, apparently in response to confidential government documents being found on LimeWire. The text of the bill, however, provides a very broad definition of 'peer-to-peer file sharing software,' and may extend to more than they intend (SMB? LDAP?)."
Re:Whitelist, not blacklist! (Score:4, Informative)
It use to be that a base could keep its own list and the local people could control it, however a few years ago that was removed and now there is a central office that does all approvals. This office takes an average around 1 year to approve major software releases,aka Microsoft, and if it not then it takes longer.
However even then it is a people problem, the local base level admin and security people total ignore this and install almost anything they want.
Re:How will the government botnets run!?!? (Score:5, Informative)
Nah, the government will just contract that stuff out to the likes of Halliburton and Xe (formerly Blackwater).
Ron
Re:Whitelist, not blacklist! (Score:3, Informative)
Re:How am I supposed to patch World of Warcraft?? (Score:0, Informative)
Morale reasons buddy! If you're deployed overseas in the military or even as a civilian contractor, there are fairly long periods of time where it can seriously get boring as fuck. I'd rather people blow off some steam in a game (when reasonable) rather than on other people or taxpayer bought materials and equipment. Besides bandwidth is typically cheaper in the long run than injuries, incidents, wastage, and damaged equipment.
Re:How will the government botnets run!?!? (Score:3, Informative)