Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Censorship Government The Internet The Media

Venezuela's Chavez To Limit Internet Freedom 452

terets1 writes "Reuters reports that Venezuela's leader, Hugo Chavez, issued a call on Saturday for 'internet controls' to prevent rumors and inaccurate reporting from spreading. He specifically cited a case in which a website incorrectly reported that a senior minister had been assassinated and kept the story up for two days. Many of Venezuela's opposition movements use social networking sites to communicate. It is not apparent at this time exactly what kind of controls Chavez has in mind or whether those controls will be similar to the controls in Iran that have been used to silence opposition movements. Chavez said, 'The Internet cannot be something open where anything is said and done. Every country has to apply its own rules and norms.'"
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Venezuela's Chavez To Limit Internet Freedom

Comments Filter:
  • Re:Way to go (Score:5, Informative)

    by binarylarry ( 1338699 ) on Sunday March 14, 2010 @11:39AM (#31472344)

    You must be new... to Venezula.

    They used to have private TV broadcasters you know...

  • Hugo Chavez has promised to speed up "the construction of true socialism" in Venezuela now that he can stand for re-election indefinitely. "We have exploded the barriers to a permanent socialist revolution [newstechnica.com]."

    Chavez has already taken control of the country's vast oil wealth, expropriated private landholdings and businesses and instituted a programme of deep social reforms. He has attacked the "distribution of wealth" problem by destroying as much of it as possible. After Chávez promised to nationalise the biggest power and phone companies, the Caracas Stock Exchange closed nearly 20% down, Electricidad de Caracas fell 25% and CA Nacional Telefonos was suspended from trading. The Venezuelan Bolivar has been replaced in common use with twigs and small rocks, which suddenly have much greater practical exchange value.

    Chavez next wants to merge all his coalition partners into a single party, remove the opposition television channel, monitor the Internet "appropriately," nationalise key businesses and rule by decree for a year. However, construction of a one-hundred-metre tall gold statue of himself in the Caracas city square that turns to follow the sun will be delayed until next year, and renaming the days of the week and months of the year after himself and his mother can wait until the year after.

    Chavez' good friend Fidel Castro expressed his confidence that Chavez was in no danger from the US. "This is the CIA we're talking about," said Castro. "They could fuck up a wet dream. Hey, maybe they'll try the exploding cigar trick again. That's a good one."

  • by arielCo ( 995647 ) on Sunday March 14, 2010 @12:10PM (#31472576)
    The rumor was posted anonymously in well-known forum Noticiero Digital [noticierodigital.com], which is intermittently moderated, if at all. Local TV news station Globovisión (strongly critical of Chávez's government, and a frequent target of regulatory action) quotes Chávez [globovision.com] (in Spanish):

    The internet cannot be a free thing, each country has its rules. Regulation and laws. All these pages have an administrator. We must act. We're going to request support from the Attorney General.

    This is not acceptable, that they broadcast whatever they want, poisoning the minds of many people

    Noticiero Digital (listen, this is very grave): "Breaking news; Diosdado Cabello [wikipedia.org] murdered" [...] Someone has to be responsible here because these pages cannot be free for what you to want to say. There are laws here and they must be obeyed.

    Link to original video: Dailymotion - Chávez pide actuar contra ND [dailymotion.com] (in Spanish).

  • by ralx ( 1660641 ) on Sunday March 14, 2010 @12:14PM (#31472594)
    He didn't simply complain, he called to control what can be seen or written on internet. Actually Venezuelan government has been already working on a single point of access to Internet under a "better performance" false claim.
  • Re:Way to go (Score:4, Informative)

    by dskzero ( 960168 ) on Sunday March 14, 2010 @12:29PM (#31472682) Homepage
    Wait, wait, were you here when the coup happened? Because I could speak at lenghts about all that happened there, including Chavez taking up on a national forced broadcast - which happens bassically every damn day - and when it ended, a bunch of people - including journalists - had been shot by snipers. RCTV has been denied all casting on Venezuela, this is a fact. Even when the earthquake on Chile, the national broadcast by the president was an *optional* lending of space by the private TV stations. Here, it's forced and a daily thing for as much as Chavez saying he's pissed off at the internet. RCTV decided they weren't going to take it, and they were denied of the licence. Now they are applying that to every TV station, including cable tv, which is an entirely new thing. Now he wants to do the same to the internet. Either you are with him, or, apparently, you have to remain silent. If it isn't something intrinsically linked to a dictatorship, well, something is wrong with the world.
  • Re:That's the plan (Score:1, Informative)

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday March 14, 2010 @12:37PM (#31472730)

    Welcome to Slashdot "chavista' friend... Apart from the regional channel Globovision what other channel openly criticize the government? Venevision made a pact with the government and RCTV was taken down and supplanted by a pseudo-cuban channel... Now they want to control Internet using a unique point of access controlled by CANTV.

  • Re:Way to go (Score:1, Informative)

    by dskzero ( 960168 ) on Sunday March 14, 2010 @12:41PM (#31472764) Homepage
    Well, I *was* there. There you go!
  • by dskzero ( 960168 ) on Sunday March 14, 2010 @12:43PM (#31472774) Homepage
    Actually, he has. CANTV, which is the main telephone provider in Venezuela, has been routinely blocking certain webpages. It's owned by the government. I could find sources, but they are all on spanish. Granted, it isn't a very effective block (hello proxies), which is probably why the full blown out block hasn't been implemented: They can't.
  • by dskzero ( 960168 ) on Sunday March 14, 2010 @12:49PM (#31472824) Homepage
    Wait, wait, the coup attempt in 1992 was directed by Chavez, not targeting him. He was elected in 1999.
  • Re:Way to go (Score:4, Informative)

    by HungryHobo ( 1314109 ) on Sunday March 14, 2010 @12:56PM (#31472872)

    If you had done 10 seconds research you'd have noticed that this wasn't about a news story posted on the website.
    It was some random users posting a rumour on the forums.
    Not the website owners.

    Essentially he wants to kill open online forums.

    From google translate:

    On the evening of Saturday, the President of the Republic Hugo Chávez has asked the Attorney General's Office and the Minister Diosdado Cabello take legal action against this site by false rumors posted two new forumers in one of our forums and concerned the alleged murder of two ombudsmen linked to the Government.

    Chavez wants to silence anyone who doesn't agree with him.
    Can we just accept that he's evil yet?
    he's been making the effort to convince us all for a while but some people don't seem to want to listen.

  • Re:Way to go (Score:2, Informative)

    by dskzero ( 960168 ) on Sunday March 14, 2010 @01:37PM (#31473156) Homepage
    That shows how much people want to hear his messages, if it wasn't clear enough. About the snipers, there is a lot on the net to be searched for regarding the events of april 11 2002. If the snipers aren't enough for you, there are gunners shooting at the manifestation - one of the being an active member of the government party -, and the attack on RCTV headquarters, led by the people at the assembly, including Iris Varela.

    Something to be shown:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2mlcxcn86lg [youtube.com]

    The first clip shows the government channel reporting the events. The second, shows the opposition one. Which one you choose is up to you, but denying it was a terrible event shows a lack of ethic.The people shot down by the snipers are shown on that video. You probably won't understand a word of the reporters, but the images should be an important clue. There are more videos around.
  • by wiredog ( 43288 ) on Sunday March 14, 2010 @01:40PM (#31473184) Journal

    President Bush yesterday

    You do realize that Bush isn't the President of the US anymore, right? We booted him out over a year ago.

  • Re:That's the plan (Score:2, Informative)

    by fnj ( 64210 ) on Sunday March 14, 2010 @02:58PM (#31473726)

    MM is not million. M (mega) is million. MM is not even million in roman numerals, God help us. MM in roman numerals is 2000. I know this usage is common in business related writing, but it exasperates the literate.

  • by westlake ( 615356 ) on Sunday March 14, 2010 @03:27PM (#31473920)

    In free countries, it's recognized that you can't defame public officials.

    The standard in the U.S. is based on malice. You were out to do damage.

    You broadcast something you knew was a lie or demonstrated a reckless disregard for the truth.

    Free societies do not remain free when their elected representatives can be slandered into political oblivion.

    Defamation and the First Amendment [freedomforum.org]

  • Re:Way to go (Score:4, Informative)

    by phayes ( 202222 ) on Sunday March 14, 2010 @03:41PM (#31473990) Homepage

    further investigation indicated that had the recounts been completed that it would've almost certainly given Gore the necessary votes to win the election.

    No. Further investigation by a coalition of newspapers revealed that the only way Gore could have won would have been to cherry pick the districts to be recounted that were favorable to him while disallowing recounts in all the districts that weren't. The supreme court sniffed out the unfairness of this & rightly put a stop to it. This biased method of counting votes is no better than counting "Only whites" or "Only those with a communist party membership card".

  • Re:Way to go (Score:2, Informative)

    by Artemis3 ( 85734 ) on Sunday March 14, 2010 @05:18PM (#31474682)

    Here is the source, and Chavez doesn't mention filters or firewalls, he says people should get prosecuted using the law and constitution:
    http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xckilm_ch%E1vez-pide-actuar-contra-nd_news [dailymotion.com]

    He then quotes the German Chancellor Angela Merkel saying she said "Internet cannot be something free" (an opinion) and says there should be regulations and laws, which each country should make. He then goes on and talks about a guy arrested in Colombia for saying Uribe's son was in danger of being killed, and in the United States to people threatening President Obama (on internet).

    "It is not apparent at this time exactly what kind of controls Chavez has in mind or whether those controls will be similar to the controls in Iran that have been used to silence opposition movements." This is Reuters doing, or their journalist view, it is not mentioned in the speech and its pure bias attempting to lead the reader opinion on the matter.

    What he did say was that this particular site has been repeatedly infringing the law (Venezuelan) and calls the General Attorney for action against the administrator and participants of this forum (IMO this will mean nothing if the guys/site reside outside the country).

    If you know Spanish, or know someone you trust that knows spanish, watch the video. This is yet another example of why corporate media is criticized by Chavez which in turn criticizes him in a never ending duel.

  • Re:Way to go (Score:3, Informative)

    by msuarezalvarez ( 667058 ) on Monday March 15, 2010 @12:22PM (#31483160)
    I have no idea what you are trying to say. I'm sure they both know that there is no "Castro's Venezuela"!

What is research but a blind date with knowledge? -- Will Harvey

Working...