Wikileaks and Iceland MPs Propose Journalism Haven 153
geegel sends word that Iceland could become a journalism haven if a proposal put forward by some Icelandic MPs, aided by Wikileaks, succeeds. Julian Assange, editor of Wikileaks, said that the idea is to "try and reform Iceland's media law to be a very attractive jurisdiction for investigative journalists." The article notes one area in which supporters of the Icelandic Modern Media Initiative need to tread carefully: "...the troubles of the financial sector may lead some Icelanders to be sceptical of efforts to transform their country and [one supporter] is aware of the need not to make exaggerated claims." A British opponent of the idea (and supporter of the UK's draconian libel laws) is quoted: "The provisions allowing defendants to counter-sue 'libel tourists' in their home courts could transform the humble Icelander into a legal superman, virtually untouchable abroad for comment written — and uploaded — at home."
Talk at 26C3 (Score:2, Informative)
Re:virtually untouchable? (Score:4, Informative)
Apparently you don't understand how the human brain works. If you're not shouting louder than the other guy, people only hear one side, and they remember the accusations. Look in to "Source amnesia." After some time's passed, people won't remember where they heard that someone said "he's probably an ass rapist." Instead, they'll just think "Oh, he's an ass rapist." Even if "he" proves that he's not even got a dick to rape with. So, unfortunately, no, just demanding evidence in your own puny voice is not going to save you from a dedicated smear campaign.
Re:virtually untouchable? (Score:2, Informative)
Yes true, but when you demand evidence, and one of those guys cannot provide any, then it doesn't matter how loud they shout. It only makes the look like a fool, and then they will be dismissed as whackjobs (or trolls).
I still know people who don't believe Obama has a birth certificate, because he's actually Kenyan, and/or think he's a Muslim.
Has there been any turn on Fox after they had both those stories were running through their headlines when the evidence was clearly against them?
I also live in a small community where people frequently make up unsupported claims, often with ulterior motives, and get a large following of ignorant people to protest and shout down/up legislation without evidence.
Further, you don't receive chain emails from you family/friends/coworkers? I get them all the time telling me about the latest fatalities from aspartame and how glade products are fire hazards. Sometimes even mundane things like: Did you know?Ohio has no natural lakes! Just to see if I'm paying attention I guess.
I wish your comment was the truth but it isn't in my experience.