Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Patents Wireless Networking

Motorola Asks ITC To Ban BlackBerry Imports 75

alphadogg writes "Patent litigation between Motorola and Research In Motion is heating up, with Motorola filing a complaint with the US International Trade Commission. In the complaint, Motorola alleges that RIM engages in unfair trade practices by importing and selling products that infringe five Motorola patents. The patents cover technologies related to Wi-Fi access, application management, user interface, and power management, Motorola said. Motorola is asking the ITC to investigate RIM and bar the company from importing, marketing, and selling products in the US that use the technologies."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Motorola Asks ITC To Ban BlackBerry Imports

Comments Filter:
  • by Obstin8 ( 827030 ) on Saturday January 23, 2010 @01:14PM (#30870570)
    then the only option is protectionism.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Saturday January 23, 2010 @01:15PM (#30870582)

    Freshly stacked with Republicans, the Supreme Court has just legalized bribery.

    As you can see from our patent system, bribery has been corrupting our elected officials for a long time.

    So bribe your congressman. What? You can't afford to?!?

    Then go fuck yourself. America is for soulless corporations tearing through the world like a real life Sky-Net.

  • by pete6677 ( 681676 ) on Saturday January 23, 2010 @01:21PM (#30870624)

    Within about 10 years or less, patent litigation will be the ONLY line of business left for former U.S. tech giants. All innovation will take place elsewhere, as it largely is already. You'll know this time is near once Microsoft loses their monopoly on the PC desktop, which they inevitably will.

  • by unity100 ( 970058 ) on Saturday January 23, 2010 @01:41PM (#30870782) Homepage Journal

    doesnt monopolizing entire national market through usage of patents and copyrights or cartel practice kinda defy the point of having one ?

  • by zwede ( 1478355 ) on Saturday January 23, 2010 @01:51PM (#30870828)
    I've long had the theory that raw, uncontrolled, capitalism and communism end up the same: with a monopoly, no competition and no innovation. Only difference is with communism the state controls the monopoly, with raw capitalism the monopoly controls the state. Both rely on a submissive citizenry that can not be bothered to defend their freedom.
  • by ScrewMaster ( 602015 ) * on Saturday January 23, 2010 @01:53PM (#30870832)

    Someone mod this 'prophetic'.

    Prophetic? I disagree. I think he's only stating what's already happened to us. The process really began back in the sixties, and has been on an accelerating curve ever since. We just aren't feeling the full effects of it yet because we've kept up the fiction that we're a good place for foreign investment (although the cracks are showing). Fact is, the nation is still running on inertia. There's a Great Collapse coming ... I just don't know when. I really hope it's after I retire in peace to the island I plan to purchase after I win the lottery. Let all the stupid, shortsighted people here that truly believe that America doesn't need all those dirty machines and factories go to Hell in their own way. Ignorance is not bliss: it's the way to misery and poverty, and America is on that road.

    One of our Founders, Thomas Jefferson, early in his career believed that America would best be served by remaining a largely agrarian culture, with the few manufactured goods we needed being purchased abroad. He eventually realized that that was a mistake, that we needed industry in order to maintain our ideals, indeed to maintain our freedom. He always maintained a distrust of the corporate sector (very wise in retrospect) but ultimately understood that freedom was based upon independence, and that we could not be dependent upon other nations' good will if we wished to be free.

  • by Josh04 ( 1596071 ) on Saturday January 23, 2010 @04:20PM (#30872136)
    You're just plain wrong if you think the poor are lazier than the rich in any meaningful way.
  • by brainfsck ( 1078697 ) on Saturday January 23, 2010 @04:27PM (#30872216)

    The United States continues to lead in nobel prizes [photius.com] and university-level education and research [wikipedia.org] as well as these measures of innovation [nationmaster.com] and technological achievement [nationmaster.com].

    I'm curious which metrics you used to come to your conclusion that "[a]ll innovation will take place elsewhere, as it largely is already."

  • by Z00L00K ( 682162 ) on Saturday January 23, 2010 @04:31PM (#30872258) Homepage Journal

    The US has wasted the last decades on not development but trying to protect and conserve what is. A shitload of money going into the work of lawyers while R&D is cutting costs.

    It's like racing - either you try to block the competition or you try to drive as fast as possible. Using lawyers and litigations is just trying to block the competition - but when you are in fourth row that only means that the leaders are leaving you behind.

Always try to do things in chronological order; it's less confusing that way.

Working...