Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
The Courts Music

Constitutionality of RIAA Damages Challenged 360

NewYorkCountryLawyer writes "In SONY BMG Music Entertainment v. Tenenbaum, the defendant has filed a motion for new trial, attacking, among other things, the constitutionality of the jury's $675,000 award as being violative of due process. In his 32-page brief (PDF), Tenenbaum argues that the award exceeded constitutional due process standards, both under the Court's 1919 decision in St. Louis Railway v. Williams, as well as under its more recent authorities State Farm v. Campbell and BMW v. Gore. Defendant also argues that the Court's application of fair use doctrine was incorrect, that statutory damages should not be imposed against music consumers, and that the Court erred in a key evidentiary ruling."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Constitutionality of RIAA Damages Challenged

Comments Filter:

"Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler." -- Albert Einstein

Working...