Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Censorship Government The Internet Your Rights Online

Aussie Gov't To Introduce Bill That Would Require ISP-Level Censorship 200

bennyboy64 writes "iTnews reports that the Australian Government has announced its intention to introduce legislation that will make ISP-level filtering mandatory for all refused classification material hosted overseas. The Government intends to amend the Broadcasting Services Act in August 2010 to enforce the filter, and expects the filter to be operational within a further twelve months. 'The report into the pilot trial of ISP-level filtering demonstrates that blocking RC-rated material can be done with 100 percent accuracy and negligible impact on internet speed' Senator Conroy, Minister for Broadband, Communications and the Digital Economy said." This despite, as reader Sharky2009 writes, the trial run showing that "a technically competent user could circumvent filtering technology based on ACMA’s blacklist."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Aussie Gov't To Introduce Bill That Would Require ISP-Level Censorship

Comments Filter:
  • by tepples ( 727027 ) <tepples.gmail@com> on Tuesday December 15, 2009 @10:40AM (#30443898) Homepage Journal
    If the lone holdout Attorney General gets his way, Australia will ignore comments from the public [slashdot.org] and continue to refuse classification to video games that have been rated mature in other regions. Does this mean Australia will start blocking Amazon, eBay, and other foreign sellers of mature-rated video games?
  • Conroy is a Traitor. (Score:5, Interesting)

    by ozmanjusri ( 601766 ) <aussie_bob@hoMOSCOWtmail.com minus city> on Tuesday December 15, 2009 @10:42AM (#30443940) Journal
    The new leader of the opposition, Tony Abbott, is an outspoken catholic. His party has opposed the ISP-based filter in the past, so it's just possible this nasty piece of trash legislation is an attempt to politically embarrass him.

    If he opposes the bill, the government can accuse him of hypocrisy. If he supports it, he faces rebellion in his own party.

    But if it is brinkmanship, Conroy is playing with fire. There could be a very serious electoral backlash from this.

  • national character? (Score:1, Interesting)

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday December 15, 2009 @10:45AM (#30443968)

    I have to admit, this is not what I expect to see from Australians. Perhaps from Europeans who prefer their governments to make peoples' personal decisions for them, but not from Australians.

    Not that we're better here in the 'states - we're sliding down some very similar slopes over here as well, maybe just a little bit behind. Maybe it's just that very few any more really care about being free peoples, and would rather have the convenience of a nanny state to protect them and make them feel safe.

  • by zsau ( 266209 ) <slashdot@thecart o g r a p h e rs.net> on Tuesday December 15, 2009 @11:03AM (#30444202) Homepage Journal

    There hasn't been the opportunity to since they made it obvious they would stick to their idiotic promises and drop their useful ones (i.e. since they got into power). You realise we can't just get new elections every news cycle. (Although the Prime Minister can call elections for the House of Representatives almost as often as he likes, it's terribly inconvenient and if they do go early (or, as early as you're suggesting they should've gone), people are inclined to vote them out just for dragging them out to the polls one more time than is necessary.)

    In any case, even if we could, the other lot aren't any better... Most people would rank this (known) temporary inconvenience as a lot less bad than the (unknown) evils a government ran by Tony Abbott, Leader of the Liberal Party, would bring.

    In the last case, we have a Senate and the Australian people are generally not idiotic enough to give the Government unmitigated power there. I expect the Liberal party will oppose it on the basis that they're the opposition, the Greens will oppose it on the basis that it's neither left nor liberal, and the independents will probably vote quite randomly on the basis of stellar alignment and what their advisors tell them people think.

    So ... don't say stupid things like that. The least you could do before commenting on our political system is inform yourself of the absolute basics of how it works. And in this particular case, almost every political system in the (developed) world works comparably.

    (If you really *were* telling us to use pitchforks, then either you're completely unrealistic, or completely crazy. In any case, whoever said "those who would give up an essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety" was obviously crazy and/or making use of hyperbole and/or hadn't thought about his own position, and if you're an American you've probably been brainwashed into both believing that and not acting on it. Our society is so great, and so free, precisely because we complain and wait until its time to vote instead of getting out the guns and pitchforks and executing anyone in Parliament)

  • by ajv ( 4061 ) on Tuesday December 15, 2009 @11:11AM (#30444304) Homepage

    This is an EPIC FAIL.

    Australia has led technology trends and adoption for so long, and the Government is prepared to kill it and our children's future for a single lousy vote of a Senator who has the support of exactly no one.

    The Government is terribly misguided on this one. Conroy might be pushing this as a wedge policy, he might be doing it for Fielding's support, but this issue alone will lose the ALP the next election, as well as many for years to come.

    All of Gen i, Y and X will remember this and vote accordingly for years to come. The ALP will be in the wilderness for many elections, and struggle to form a strong government in their own right without doing the independent / Greens coalition tango that is working soooo well for them right now.

    Seriously, I could see the Greens take this to the election and coupled with effective climate change policies and no internet censoring, they could become the balance of power for years.

    Conroy is Public Enemy #1. He has committed electoral suicide for himself and his Government. I really do think they have no idea exactly how unpopular this policy will be.

    In short - how to fight this thing:

    * Ring your politicians tomorrow. All of them. Make the phones run hot.
    * Write them letters.
    * Ask to see them. Talk to them about this issue, and only this issue.
    * Write letters to the news sites
    * Blog and Twitter and Facebook away.
    * Attend rallies. Publish photos and write ups about same.
    * Join the EFA.
    * Sign up to Get Up if you feel inclined
    * Use #nocleanfeed religiously.
    * Do not do work for Conroy's department. Resign or transfer if you work there.
    * Support ISPs that are against this idea. Leave ISPs that support it or who have no position.

    If it becomes law, mass civil disobedience is required. I will be blogging about how to get around the filtering.

  • by PeterBrett ( 780946 ) on Tuesday December 15, 2009 @12:26PM (#30445462) Homepage

    The Labor party (Current government) was meant to be liberal and reformist. The alternative is the Liberal party who despite there name are mostly socially conservative Christians.

    I refuse to believe that there is a whole continent-sized country with two and only two political parties. If you can confidently vote for neither the Labour nor Liberal parties, why not try one of the following options:

    • Vote for a third party;
    • Run as a third party candidate if no third party candidates are available in your district;
    • Spoil your ballot paper.

    Don't vote for the "not quite the worst" party: use your vote responsibly.

"If I do not want others to quote me, I do not speak." -- Phil Wayne

Working...