Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Privacy Communications The Internet Your Rights Online

Shedding Your Identity In the Digital Age 138

newscloud writes "Writer Evan Ratliff tells how he managed to hide from crowdsourced searchers for 27 days. The first person to find him and photograph him would claim a $5,000 prize. In addition to hiding out as a roadie with indy band 'The Hermit Thrushes' for a week, Ratliff donned a variety of increasingly impressive disguises. It's an interesting read on how to disappear in the digital age: 'August 13, 6:40 PM: I'm driving East out of San Francisco on I-80, fleeing my life under the cover of dusk. Having come to the interstate by a circuitous route, full of quick turns and double backs, I'm reasonably sure that no one is following me. I keep checking the rearview mirror anyway. From this point on, there's no such thing as sure. Being too sure will get me caught. About 25 minutes later, as the California Department of Transportation database will record, my green 1999 Honda Civic, California plates 4MUN509, passes through the tollbooth on the far side of the Carquinez Bridge, setting off the FasTrak toll device, and continues east toward Lake Tahoe. What the digital trail will not reflect is that a few miles past the bridge I pull off the road, detach the FasTrak, and stuff it into the duffle bag in my trunk, where its signal can't be detected. There will be no digital record that at 4 AM I hit Primm, Nevada, a sad little gambling town about 40 minutes from Vegas, where $15 cash gets me a room with a view of a gravel pile...' Spoiler alert: We previously discussed the denouement of the contest."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Shedding Your Identity In the Digital Age

Comments Filter:
  • by WiiVault ( 1039946 ) on Wednesday November 25, 2009 @12:19AM (#30222740)
    Sure one might be able to hide from a group of relativly untrained people with no resources for quite a long time. But in my experience if someone is actually wanted by the police they tend to be found pretty quickly. The only reason so many get away is simply a lack of any real motivation to target that specific invidiual. This is why the bike you had stolen is far less likely to be found than the man who murdered his wife. In the end, a well trained force with authority and technology is quite difficult to evade in the long run. Especially without going life ruining stres and anxiety.
  • three words... (Score:4, Insightful)

    by russ1337 ( 938915 ) on Wednesday November 25, 2009 @01:06AM (#30222974)
    Osama Bin Laden
  • by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday November 25, 2009 @01:11AM (#30222994)

    It's really not all that hard to avoid the police either. The biggest difference is that if you're hiding from the authorities you generally aren't too concerned with staying within the law while doing so, which opens up a lot of different options. For example, a bogus driver's license and social security number can go a long way & they aren't too hard to obtain if you are willing to break various laws.
    As someone said, he basically had a neon sign on his head while doing this, and didn't end up getting caught despite all the efforts until he intentionally walked into a "trap" where he knew people would be looking for him. In addition, he kept most of his ties to his real life, where someone who was truly trying to disappear would have most likely not.

    Hell, if he was really trying to go off the map, he could have just bought some camping gear and a month's worth of food rations and camped out in a remote location. Still, all in all it was an interesting experiment.

  • by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday November 25, 2009 @01:14AM (#30223014)

    "The average person can dissapear quite effectively from pretty much anyone except the govt or groups with similar power."

    Actually you're wrong.

    It's easier to disappear from the government than it is to disappear from a determined
    person who is looking for you and doesn't care how much it costs or how long it takes.

    All the government will typically do is wait for you to appear on a database, or
    for some cop to run your info during a routine stop. But if you make sure you
    don't drive a car, and you don't use anything which can be traced to you, you can
    most assuredly hide for quite some time.

    As any skip-tracer will tell you, what gets people caught when all else fails is that
    they don't change their habits, despite the fact that they may have changed everything
    else. So, if you used to go golfing a lot, or bet on horses at the race track, you have to
    give all that up if you want to stay hidden. Essentially, you have to cut all ties to your
    former life, and that includes "who you were" in terms of behavior. Most people will get
    lazy or lonely and slack off on this, and that's when they get found.

  • Comment removed (Score:4, Insightful)

    by account_deleted ( 4530225 ) on Wednesday November 25, 2009 @01:31AM (#30223078)
    Comment removed based on user account deletion
  • by Animats ( 122034 ) on Wednesday November 25, 2009 @02:00AM (#30223198) Homepage

    More like Ratliff wanted his life back and decided what he was getting paid wasn't worth it

    Yeah. What if everybody lost interest and stopped looking, and he was stuck in Outer Nowhere, working in a warehouse.

    "You mean nobody remembers my Round the World Walk?" - old cartoon from Punch, showing a guy in hiking gear in the lobby of a big London newspaper.

  • Comment removed (Score:3, Insightful)

    by account_deleted ( 4530225 ) on Wednesday November 25, 2009 @02:04AM (#30223222)
    Comment removed based on user account deletion
  • by Dunbal ( 464142 ) on Wednesday November 25, 2009 @02:18AM (#30223248)

    and off the beaten path i.e. a small town. Keep a low profile

          I'm trying to figure this out. How exactly are you going to "keep a low profile" in a small town, where virtually everyone knows everyone else? You'll always be "that stranger". IMO a large city is better for anonymity.

  • by smitty777 ( 1612557 ) on Wednesday November 25, 2009 @02:20AM (#30223256) Journal

    I agree. The whole point of the Wired article this was attached to was on just how easy it is to disappear. According to the article (which is a fascinating read), the reason most folks get caught is because they don't fully distance themselves from their old lives. They eventually get lonely, bored, tired, and try to call or email someone, or use an old credit card. If you fully wanted to just "walk away", you could, but you'd have to really walk away. The point of the contest was more for fun and publicity. Like Whiteox said, he could have easily just sat in his mum's basement for a month, but that wouldn't have been any fun at all.

  • by BrokenHalo ( 565198 ) on Wednesday November 25, 2009 @02:41AM (#30223324)
    getting offline (both 'net and financially) would be a wise thing.

    Exactly. If you're really trying not to be found, staying away from communities like twitter and facebook are just the start. Otherwise, you might as well shout "Here I am, Look at me!" from the rooftops.

    So, as the guy says in TFA (which incidentally is one of the better reads I have come across on Slashdot):
    Had I shown that a person, given enough resources and discipline, could vanish from one life and reinvent himself in another?

    I would have to say no. Ratliff is obviously somewhat dependent on social engagement (which he admits as a source of stress), but there are many who are a lot more self-contained who would require less in the way of social interaction, who I think would stay below the radar for a lot longer.
  • by skine ( 1524819 ) on Wednesday November 25, 2009 @02:55AM (#30223370)

    Us starting a war in Iraq instead of looking for him seems to have worked for him too.

  • Boring (Score:3, Insightful)

    by syousef ( 465911 ) on Wednesday November 25, 2009 @03:07AM (#30223428) Journal

    1. $5000 is not that much incentive. (Hell it wouldn't cover costs for a serious attempt. Many private investigators and bounty hunters wouldn't touch it). This would be much more valid a prize that would change someone's life - say $20 million.

    2. People over-estimate the government's ability to track people down. Criminals seem to manage weeks, months or occasionally years in hiding. Mostly because the incentive for catching a petty criminal isn't all that great. Now if it were national secrets at stake that'd be different.

  • by DNS-and-BIND ( 461968 ) on Wednesday November 25, 2009 @04:33AM (#30223734) Homepage
    I wish the media would stop using the words "vanished" or "disappeared" in regards to missing persons or people who do not wish to be found. People do not vanish, they are there the whole time if you know where to look. The photoshopped stills accompanying the article are certainly no help. This confusion of thinking is really bad IMO.

    I'm rather surprised he got into a hostel, the one I tried in Venice Beach a while back demanded a passport instead of the valid ID that I presented - evidently the desk clerk didn't like my looks (I was a wandering longhair at the time) and I was denied service, just like you hear the old stories about lunch counters or the new stories about British soldiers.

    PS the classic counter-surveillance technique is three right turns in a row. If the same car is still in your rearview mirror, you can be pretty sure they're following you. Detecting surveillance is one thing, evading it quite another. Of course, these days they just stick a GPS tracker on your car, which is why you need to go into an underground structure and change vehicles.

  • by Aceticon ( 140883 ) on Wednesday November 25, 2009 @04:40AM (#30223764)

    The truth is that we don't really know how successful police really are at "catching their man".

    For all the fancy "Police investigation" TV Series where the good guys always end up getting the bad guys, in the Real World the only feedback we get comes from the media, and while they will happily publish news of the kind "Dangerous Murderer Caught" they don't exactly tend to publish news of the kind "Five Years Past And Dangerous Murderer Still Loose".

    Broad statements about how the police always catches their man when sufficiently motivated probably result of an outsider perception which was build upon from an information flow where successes are loudly celebrated while continuous failure is hidden and silent.

  • by jamesh ( 87723 ) on Wednesday November 25, 2009 @04:54AM (#30223836)

    Yup. It's pretty easy to disappear. Don't go out where you'll be seen. Give traces where you aren't.

            You know, it's not very hard to send a trusted friend your credit card and cell phone, and tell him "Use the card every few days to pull out $40, and deposit the cash once a month at a different branch.. Call your girlfriend/house/friend from my cell every few days just to chat."

    Depends on how badly they want you vs how badly you want to stay hidden... "JWSmythe (446288), in this bag we have one of your girlfriends fingers. In 9 days she will run out of fingers. Please get in touch with us.". s/girlfriend/someone_else_you_care_about as required.

    I hope I never have to stay hidden from someone who wants me at any cost.

  • by VShael ( 62735 ) on Wednesday November 25, 2009 @06:26AM (#30224344) Journal

    He seemed to have a need to keep track of the people tracking him, and he certainly got sloppy with tor.

    You know, if the police were after you, and you had a police band scanner, or some other way to see what the police were doing in their efforts to track you down, I think you wouldn't be able to resist the temptation to use it. A lot.

  • by Tellarin ( 444097 ) on Wednesday November 25, 2009 @08:44AM (#30224910) Homepage Journal

    There is a clear difference between hiding if people know who you are
    and getting away with murder if the police does not know you're the one they're looking for.

  • by mcgrew ( 92797 ) * on Wednesday November 25, 2009 @09:52AM (#30225306) Homepage Journal

    Most crimes go unsolved, whether it's your bike, someone breaking into your house, even murder. Many "solved" crimes are unsolved; Former Illinois Governor (now Federal prisoner) George Ryan stopped the death penalty in Illinois when it was found that half the men on Illinois' death row were innocent -- the real killers were (and are) still free.

    Note the last line in this news story [sj-r.com] and many others: "No arrests were made immediately following the attacks." Ther still haven't been any arrests.

  • Re:Boring (Score:4, Insightful)

    by Cro Magnon ( 467622 ) on Wednesday November 25, 2009 @10:10AM (#30225466) Homepage Journal

    2. People over-estimate the government's ability to track people down. Criminals seem to manage weeks, months or occasionally years in hiding. Mostly because the incentive for catching a petty criminal isn't all that great. Now if it were national secrets at stake that'd be different.

    It's not the ABILITY of the government. It's the MOTIVATION. The two-bit conman who ripped me off is still at large, even though he had a long criminal record before he ripped me off, and doubtless a long record afterward. But, I bet if he shot the mayor's dog, he'd be in jail the next day.

  • by WinterSolstice ( 223271 ) on Wednesday November 25, 2009 @10:29AM (#30225674)

    Agreed. After reading the article, it looks like he was completely obsessed with keeping track of the trackers (which makes sense if his boss didn't give him real work to do).

    He also was obviously trying to get caught towards the end there. I mean seriously, who adds a pizza place their facebook? Especially when 'on the lam' as it were.

    Lessons learned here? Don't act like a tool. Don't spend all your time on twitter and facebook trying to leave breadcrumbs. If you use Tor, use it all the way. Don't get bored and obsessive.

    Of course, as the comments pointed out, that would have made it boring as a challenge - he'd never have been found.

It is easier to write an incorrect program than understand a correct one.

Working...