Book Reviews
Recent reviews from Slashdot readers:
- Advanced Excel for Scientific Data Analysis Learn to turn Excel into something that rivals Mathematica using VBA, brains, and a heaping helping of fortitude.(Jack Herrington's review.)
- Nagios 3 Enterprise Network Monitoring A great book for anyone using Nagios as more than a casual user.(jgoguen's review.)
- Schneier on Security Schneier argues that security is not something you can buy; it is something you must get.(Ben Rothke's review.)
Submitting a review for consideration is easy; please first read Slashdot's book review guidelines. Updated: 2008114 by samzenpus
5816173
story
Comments: 105 +- Your Rights Online: Parental Control Software Datamines Kids' Online Conversations on Monday September 07, @09:17AM
background: url(//a.fsdn.com/sd/topics/topiccommunications.gif); width:96px; height:62px;
communications
background: url(//a.fsdn.com/sd/topics/topicinternet.gif); width:70px; height:73px;
internet
An AP report reveals that web-monitoring software from Sentry and FamilySafe, both developed by EchoMetrix Inc., is harvesting data from kids' online chats, trying to determine their opinions on games, movies, and music. The data is then sold to other companies for advertising purposes.
"In June, EchoMetrix unveiled a separate data-mining service called Pulse that taps into the data gathered by Sentry software to give businesses a glimpse of youth chatter online. While other services read publicly available teen chatter, Pulse also can read private chats. It gathers information from instant messages, blogs, social networking sites, forums and chat rooms. ... Parents who don't want the company to share their child's information to businesses can check a box to opt out. But that option can be found only by visiting the company's Web site, accessible through a control panel that appears after the program has been installed. It was not in the agreement contained in the Sentry Total Home Protection program The Associated Press downloaded and installed Friday."
Related Stories
: by
No man in the world has more courage than the man who can stop after
eating one peanut.
-- Channing Pollock
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the Poster. The Rest © 1997-2010 Geeknet, Inc.
Do I smell a lawsuit? (Score:4, Funny)
Yup, I think I do, yesss preciousss. Filthy nasssty antiprivacccccy dataminersessss! OUR precioussss!
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
i doubt it. Im sure there was something deep down in the fine print that will derail a suit.
Re: (Score:2)
This. Or has that meme been played out?
There is probably something in the install EULA that says that for additional clauses or changes to the EULA, people should always visit the company's website. It's like the terms of your credit card. There's always a clause in there that says they can change the terms at any time and give you notice. The clause in the EULA will tell you to go to their website for changes and update privacy information.
IIRC the online protection law in the USA has a 13 year old cut
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Sure they should. If you agree to something you should be held accountable.
Anything less breaks down the entire concept of contract law. " wahhh.... i don't like your terms, so ill agree but wont follow them". Very dangerous precedent.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
The response to that will be, "Yeah, our EULA is on our web site. If you want to read it there, you can."
Companies know that the number of people who'll actually go to the website and read the EULA before buying the software will be vanishingly small.
Re:Do I smell a lawsuit? (Score:4, Insightful)
"Im sure there was something deep down in the fine print that will derail a suit."
Bullshit. When parents find out their children are being used for profit-making without their consent, not only is it going to be a shitstorm but it just might get COPPA reinstated.
Never underestimate the backlash of millions of pissed off parents. Many of them will do absolutely psychotic things to defend their children from any perceived threat.
Parent
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Well Paypal tried to anticipate potential lawsuits when they wrote their User Agreement, but the U.S. court very quickly expelled those portions. The court said that people can Not sign-away legally protected rights or privileges.
Similarly a child or parent can not sign-away the children's right not to be monitored, regardless of what this software's EULA states.
That is what you get (Score:5, Insightful)
When you delegate your parental responsibilities.
Re:That is what you get (Score:5, Insightful)
When you delegate your parental responsibilities.
As a parent of a three year old girl, I agree with you. However, standing over their shoulder the entire time they use a computer is not going to be very productive.
I wish more parents would understand that you have about 8 years from the time that a kid is born to install a sense of confidence and worth in them that can't be easily (if at all) broken by future peers, predators or come what may. If you manage to do it, your kid will make good choices.
No software is a substitute for a desire in a child to make good, positive self serving choices when they are confronted with the various bumps in growing up.
What a world this police state is becoming, sheesh.
Parent
Re:That is what you get (Score:5, Interesting)
The problem isn't the kids, the problem is that some (probably uncomfortably large) percentage of parents absolutely refuse to consider their children as anything other than half employee and half property. You raise your kids to never know privacy, dignity, or respect and unless they are particularly unique in some way that shakes them free of the pattern they'll be doormats to anyone that wants to violate them in a similar way.
It doesn't help that we're the country that has no problem with flooding our kids with violence but god help us if they might possibly see a nipple somewhere, let alone anything else, and so parents will fall over themselves to pay various companies god knows how much for every knee-jerk reaction they can wring out of them.
Parent
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Children as half-employees and half-property? Speak for yourself. I think of them as half fuel and half dog food.
Re:That is what you get (Score:4, Insightful)
There's a reason these stereotypes exist. Its because, in a large number of cases, they're actually true. If nothing else, the success of these companies proves that. The success of "Think of the children!" legislation proves it too.
No one in power is standing up to the parents of America and saying, "Hey, the reason your kids are fat and emotionally maladjusted is because you're too scared to let them go out on their own and make their own decisions." So, its up to people like us to make that point and hammer away at it until it sinks in.
Parent
Re: (Score:2)
I don't yet have any children of my own but I agree with basic philosophy on parenting. My parents pretty much raised me that way and I'd like to think I turned out all right. I would partner permitting of course want the same for my children and would be EXACTLY like my parents were; you know that thing every teenager always says they would never do.
I am not sure about the computer supervision though. At least during that vulnerable time when you want to be instilling your values I think you do want to
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
Cable PVR boxes send usage stats to the cable co (uk) , ok they dont know WHO is watching, but they know exactly what you have watched, if you skipped the ads etc.
Re: (Score:2)
Exactly, I plan on teaching my daughter to be like Ellen in Hard Candy.
That'll teach 'em.
Destroying childrens privacy in order to save them (Score:4, Insightful)
Part of me wants to give a big Nelson ha-ha to the overprotective parents who install this crap trying to save their children from the eeeevil people on the Internet. Is it really any surprise that the corporations most interested in "protecting" your children are those who have figured out a way to exploit them?
Re: (Score:2)
Well, the other part of you will cry in terror, when those children are going to become leaders of the world, controlling your life too. (Ok, not really leaders, because they never learned to be anything else than doormats. :/)
Sue them. (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
I'm not so sure. If the data is not personally identifiable, I don't think it violates the European Union Privacy Directive.
Note that the information is data-mined for advertising information (finding out what kids are interested in), not for ad targetting (send an ad for "High School Musical IV" to kids talking about "Guitar Hero").
But companies do receive snippets of actual chats. How do they ensure that doesn't contain anything that is personally identifiable?
Re:Sue them. (Score:4, Insightful)
Parent
Re:Sue them. (Score:5, Interesting)
Parent
That's just one program that does this... (Score:2)
How many more programs are there that do the same?
I never liked to have programs running in the background... this is just another reason not to install any program at all that wants to start up when I turn the computer on.
Privacy... what's that?
Can someone just make sure that these freaks are locked away for a decade or two please? Any invasion of privacy as extreme as this surely is illegal???
Re: (Score:2)
Heh - as a very tangentially related item, am I the only one that when starting at a new business runs hijackthis to hunt down any and all background processes and kill them off if I don't explicity want it running?
Half the time there's something there. Be it malware, spyware in the sense that the boss wants to spy on you, or some other such nonsense (every ad-bar you can imagine).
Thankfully my current employer allows me to use Ubuntu on my desktop, but it helps that I'm the senior unix engineer. I've als
Sounds Illegal to me (Score:5, Informative)
In the US, children have special privacy protections afforded by law. It involves things like "opt-in" and parental consent.
http://www.coppa.org/comply.htm [coppa.org]
IANAL, but I have worked on a number of projects which had to comply. Based on what is said here, this seems in flagrant violation. Somebody call the cops.
Not apparently illegal [Re:Sounds Illegal to me] (Score:5, Informative)
In the US, children have special privacy protections afforded by law. It involves things like "opt-in" and parental consent.
http://www.coppa.org/comply.htm [coppa.org]
IANAL, but I have worked on a number of projects which had to comply. Based on what is said here, this seems in flagrant violation. Somebody call the cops.
Nope.
"The Children's Online Privacy Protection Act and Rule apply to individually identifiable information about a child"
As long as they're only data mining the information on what the kids are interested in, and not saving which child was interested in what, they're apparently not violating the COPPA law.
Which is not to say that what they're doing is right, of course.
Parent
Re: (Score:2)
FTA:"We never know the name of the kid -- it's bobby37 on the house computer"
How many Bobby's live in the house? And what info do they ask for when you register the software? Name, address, phone, etc. Crap, there's a good chance that the computer's named "Johnson Family Laptop"
They know the names, and they save the registration info. I would further guess that they provide data by location to these companies as well. So they know that Bobby37 is on the computer at 1400 Main St whose parents are Don and Ju
Re: (Score:2)
Yes, I see your point. You may be right. At least, it looks like the act [coppa.org] specifically defines personal information as including an "identifier" that, while defined broadly, wouldn't cover aggregate statistical information culled from these raw data streams.
I wonder if there still isn't a COPPA angle to prosecute, for some enterprising DA.
If EchoMetrix is like most American marketing data firms, they have no safeguards or controls, so raw data may be going to partners, subcontractors, "affiliates," etc. That
Re: (Score:2)
And, as far as parental consent is concerned, the company already has it. After all, it was the *parent* that installed this software, implicitly consenting to said data gathering about their child.
Highly Vauable Information (Score:5, Informative)
Early results indicate that kids are pre-occupied with gayness (in an unfocussed and confused way), wedgies, noogies and the smell of poo.
Further analysis reveals that Disney actors are hot, teachers aren't and swimming pools are responsible for most diseases.
Any company data-mining this further are welcome to try. There are great truths to be found within, I'm sure.
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Early results indicate that kids are pre-occupied with gayness (in an unfocussed and confused way)
Well, to be fair, so is the entire Republican party.
...Further analysis reveals that Disney actors are hot, teachers aren't and swimming pools are responsible for most diseases.
Don't be silly. Cooties are responsible for most illnesses. Boys get 'em from kissing girls. But, of course, only kids who are totally gay would be kissing girls. Ick!
Of course, once you get above the 9-year-old demographic, the scientific consensus changes.
Wonderful ... (Score:5, Insightful)
Scare tactics (Score:4, Interesting)
Of course the kids have privacy rights, but as minors cannot exercise these which the parents/guardians have a fiduciary duty to exercise. The parents doubtless click agreement when the software is installed.
The real problem is that parents are scared into agreement by media overhyping low probability events and omitting crucial explanations / causes. So the parents hear: "Your kids could be another Columbine or victim" to sell whatever schlock they're peddling. Non-sequitur but the data is obscured.
A bigger question is why people like being scared. Adrenline rush? Most TV news runs that way. I never understood the popularity of horror flicks.
It looks like (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Not really, it's just marketing and shareholders again.
Proprietary software is evil (Score:3, Interesting)
One thing I always tell people is that people who won't show you the source code to their software have something to hide. It's almost certain their software is doing something that benefits themselves at your expense. Sovereignty over your own possessions requires that you insist on visible source code, even if you can't understand it yourself.
Interesting resume (Score:2)
"Skilled developer, designer and mentor with over 15 years of industry experience. Focus on high-quality reusable code, and designs that stand the test of time. Also an innovator and source of new ideas who can push them forward in a way that's greeted positively by the entire organization. A rare blend of good communication skills and technical excellence. "
You forgot to add "modest" to that list.
Oh , wait...
Kids aren't worth it. (Score:2)
I decided long ago, to never have kids. Kids aren't worth it, and this is a horrible world to raise kids in. Every time Slashdot has something on the subject of kids, its some horrible and obscene shit that makes me wish I was never born. This company should have the book thrown at them. So do the parents.
What the fuck are parents thinking? Seriously.
Re: (Score:2)
I don't like what this company is doing and will avoid the product and tell others to do so. I am a privacy advocate. Even I wouldn't say that a company trying to make money is necessarily "horrible and obscene". Until "datamining the Internet activities of minors" becomes a crime, this is no more horrible and obscene than television. We all have the choice to switch that off, too.
The difference for me is that a computer is far more useful than a television.
By the way, I don't condemn you for not having chi
Technology is a tool, not a substitute (Score:5, Insightful)
My wife and I view our responsibility as parents as very basic:
1) Provide basic necessities an enjoyments of life (emphasis on necessities)
2) Provide love and a feeling of trust and safety in the home
3) Teach them a strong sense of identity and self-worth
4) Teach our kids what choices are, how to recognize good from bad choices, and how to accept the consequences of you actions
For computers, here's our strategy:
1) Place computers in a open public place (including our own)
2) Teach them that computers are a tool and how people use it for good and bad
3) Openly discuss what acceptable and unacceptable behavior with computers/games are
4) Limit time spent on computer
5) As much as possible, don't create double standards
6) Use OpenDNS and block certain sites depending on their age
We feel parental technology should be used to reinforce what you're already teaching, not as a substitute.
My philosophy: Parental control = censorship. (Score:3, Interesting)
No exceptions. It's morally wrong, and only "required" if you're an unfit parent that does not have the combination of true respect and ability to educate.
Also it is for those sick twisted minds, who somehow got the idea that sex & co. would somehow be bad and even hurt children. Something that makes absolutely no sense, if you so much as think about if for more than ten seconds.
It's really rather sad. Parents giving their unfitness and diseases to their poor children, who then continue to infect others.
Only education can cure that. Social education and education about how to avoid false social conditioning.
But unfortunately, the government works -- on a higher level -- in the same unfit and sick way.
Basically, we're fucked. :/
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
You know what I think makes one unfit to be a parent? Commenting on hypothetical parents with hypothetical children using absolute statements that attempt to assert some sort of moral superiority for letting kids do anything they want.
Contrary to what you think, there isn't a right or wrong answer; it's specific to the parents and the child. Some may consider it a good opportunity to let their children go wherever they want on the Internet and then talk about whatever they see as it comes up. That's pe
It's not just the kids... (Score:2)
I recently received an email from Comcast that states that they are changing their so-called "Privacy Policy" to include data gathering from all of their internet service customers.
The problem (besides the obvious)?
The "opt-out" option doesn't work.
A couple of the 3rd party partners flat out refuse to allow opting out, and the rest ALL require you to keep a "blank cookie" on your machine to opt-out. The problem is that the vast majority of sites you visit don't work unless you allow a new cookie (including
Re:Cue lawsuits (Score:4, Funny)
"Cue lawsuits as the wife starts getting targeted advertisements for 'hot sluts in your area' due to the husbands chatting habits..."
Cue divorces as husbands start getting targeted advertisements for 'hot sluts in your area' displaying their wives.
Parent
Re:Unsafe at any SPEED (Score:4, Insightful)
Parent
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
I remember, long ago when my kids were little, experimenting with some of those baby sitter softwares. None delivered a reasonable balance between access and protection. The kid said he couldn't find anything on some subject, can't remember now what it was. Or, maybe more accurately, he complained that he was finding limited information. Anyway, I did a search, and got something like a gazillion to the gazillionth power hits. The kid looks over my shoulder, and comments that HIS internet found nothing