Late last year, a web service called Power.com launched with the aim of allowing users to unify their use of multiple social networks. Facebook quickly filed a lawsuit, objecting to the (user-authorized) gathering of their data. Reader sufijazz writes with news that
Power.com has now countersued Facebook, saying, "Facebook improperly restricts its users' access to their private information," and that Facebook's own data scraping makes their lawsuit an attempt to stifle competition. According to TechCrunch,
"Facebook can point to its efforts with Facebook Connect, which lets you log in with your Facebook username at third party sites and import some select data from your profile, as evidence of its openness. But this isn't true data portability, it's just a new walled garden — third parties are generally only allowed to cache your data, which means that you're still tethered to Facebook."
Well (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Well (Score:5, Insightful)
I think this has more to do with you wanting to move your data, not them just handing it out. There is a huge difference.
This example is more related to you going to a hospital and requesting your health records be transferred to another hospital and they say no. Don't get it confused with privacy/security.
Parent
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
I don't really agree. The bits aren't being loaded carefully in moving boxes and transported by truck. Copies of digitally stored information are cheap and if you own your own data facebook shouldn't have any objections to you using your own data elsewhere.
Placing bits of information on a pedestal like they were a Gutenberg bible is a bit like the thinking behind disallowing copying o
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Whoosh. GPs point is that data SHOULD be moveable, same as yours.
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Technically true, but really ... (Score:5, Insightful)
Yeah, technically they're withholding your data from a third party even after your authorization. But if you consider the vast majority of Facebook users, don't you think most of them need this kind of hand-holding? These are people who would authorize a complete disclosure of most of their personal information on Facebook to take a "Which Twilight Character Are You?" quiz. If anything, I think Facebook should be even more stingy, even if you choose to authorize disclosure. If you really really really really really wanted to give a third party your personal information, then you can usually do so yourself, without the third party acquiring that information through Facebook.
Now, I don't know how power.com works, nor did I RTFA, but I assume it requires certain information from Facebook that is not really yours. Information such as links to your profile, your friends' profiles, pictures, groups, what-have-you. Such information is probably strictly Facebook's property. Without such information, power.com would be useless anyway.
At any rate, as I said, if you really wanted to give your personal information to a third party, you can do so without the help of Facebook. Facebook's stinginess at releasing personal information is a good thing, and I think they should go even further in their stinginess. Personal information sometimes isn't removed from third party apps even after removal of the app, and I think Facebook should start using the ban hammer on apps and developers who keep personal information even after deauthorization. I think such stinginess can only be a good thing, until they start withholding your personal information from you directly.
Parent
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
I would love the fact if Facebook was being stingy with my information to advertisers, but they're not. Or what if I could select what information to send to applications, instead of the all or nothing approach. It sucks when they're only stingy with
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
I think this lawsuit is good, because then the court can decide what is yours and what isn't.
Yes, since the national government has a long history of supporting individual privacy and keeping our best interests at mind over that of corporate interests.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Also this is corporate interest versus corporate interest, not citizens against Facebook. It would be nice to see the EFF or ACLU get involved.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
This is pretty much what I'm thinking. I've already got tons of people asking me why I don't respond to their messages because facebook randomly closed off my access to my account (used for overglorified email really) but left it fully open and searchable. I've tried about 4 times now to get it at least locked down so people can't keep finding it anymore but all I get is the runaround about how that is what they do (hint: they don't) and how it won't ever be reactivated.
Re: (Score:2)
I would love the fact if Facebook was being stingy with my information to advertisers, but they're not
A bit outdated...but behold the beauty of easily scrapable ajax ad interfaces. [tinypic.com]
Call me a curmudgeon... (Score:3, Insightful)
Please cite for me an actual benefit of having a Facebook account?
Otherwise - GET OFF MY LAWN!
Re: (Score:1, Insightful)
online phone book for when you format your computer, but forget to backup your contact's list.
other than that... it's just another pointless social page
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
You can keep track of long lost friends.
In my case, I changed city about 6 times, and changed school about 5 times. (no, I wasn't raised in a circus) So there is a lot of people that I knew but lost track of.
I joined Facebook some weeks ago and now I have about 50 "recovered friends", that is, people that used to be my friends but then I lost touch. I chatted with some, said happy birthday to others, etc.
It would have been more difficult finding them without facebook, since finding each friend manually woul
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
^That right there is why I will never get a facebook account. If I want people I used to know and associate with to make contact with me
Re: (Score:2)
It is like the files of the KGB or the Stasi -- your "friends" write embarrassing things about yourself, and you don't know who's reading them -- except you do it willingly and co-operate, and the level of detail is greater.
Re: (Score:2)
It's an urban legend that there's Facebook-CIA ties. You decide.
Re: (Score:2)
No, of course not. The CIA doesn't do anything nasty online anywhere, ever. In
fact they don't do anything. And they're definitely not involved in icann.
Re: (Score:2)
Nor in Icahn :-)
Re: (Score:2)
It is really hard to tell if large US websites have ties with the government.
Especially after that case from a few weeks ago when a government official called to extend the power of the twitter for the benefit of ... errr ... the people of Iran.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
I've had an account for a long time. Two or three years, I guess. I was invited by a friend, so I registered. It's 99% waste of time, and 1% a convenient way to keep track of friends. Pretty much the same as Myspace, without the glaringly ugly personal pages.
As for your lawn, I'll get off it when I finish urinating on it, you crotchety old bastid. You should show a little more respect to a man who is half bald, half gray, and all gnarly!
Re:Technically true, but really ... (Score:4, Insightful)
If you're my friend, that's a fact about me. Why should Facebook own that fact?
Parent
Re: (Score:2)
They don't. You're perfectly free to enter such information on any site you want, including power.com.
But who are you, and who am I? How does a site differentiate MadFarmAnimalz from whatever-the-hell-state-you're-in from MadFarmAnimalz from some-other-state, or from the same state but who isn't you? There's some degree of work that went on there, some sort of system set up that makes it easy for you to do so, some degree of
"Their" private data. (Score:4, Interesting)
If it's "Their" private data then how hard will it be for "Them" to add it to Power.com? It looks like Power.com is trying to import and sync all the different social networks and facebook is saying No.
On one hand, if I hand all of my info to site X, why can't I give site X permission to give it to site Y.
On the other, If I give all my information to site X. Who am I to tell them what they can and can't do with it. It's like trusting the guy on the street corner and the cardboard box to be your banker. Sure if I ask for some of my money to do something with I'd like it back, but I don't expect him to give me any.
Parent
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
You have to admit there is a need for this kind of product though.
If youre a person who networks through these sites, or say you have a band or whatever, it could be a full-time job to deal with keeping your various profiles current, etc.
There are some attempts to integrate parts of things, like ping.fm for example... but if you could have ONE online presence that you were able to take wherever you wanted to, be it facebook, myspace, twitter, or whatever next week's flavor is - it would be a huge service to
Really? (Score:4, Interesting)
I sometimes wonder about the state of society that lawsuits like these should even come about in the first place. If people are dumb enough to give away their login credentials to some random website, what business is it of Facebook's? And if Facebook wants to shut the door on third parties, surely it's their service to do with as they wish?
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:1)
Microsoft also thrives on not playing nicely with others, but I know how the
~~~
Abraham Lincoln "Stand with anyone that is right; stand with him while he is right and part with him when he goes wrong."
--Abe Lincoln
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
They're well within their rights to stop automated attempts to scrape content and pursue actions against people who partake in tortious interference. Where a third-party site specifically encourages Facebook users to violate the ToS agreement by providing username and password credentials users are forbidden from disclosing.
Matters would be very different if it was just users scraping their own profile page for their persoanl use, in a non-disruptive and undetectable manner.
Or if the third party just
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
If you want a copy of any information that you post on facebook, keep a copy on your own computer. Facebook provides a free service, and if they don't think there's any value in you being able to take that data out, then that's their perogative.
I don't know where you are but in the UK there's this thing called the Data Protection Act [wikipedia.org][wikipedia.org]
So at least here it's not their perogative as to if you get to take your data out. The most they can charge you for it is £10.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
You have full rights to your data, of course they are under no obligation to provide you a copy of all your data. Unless you live in a jurisdiction that has privacy laws that require they provide all personally identifiable information for your inspection and correction.
You can login to facebook, using your username and password, and see all your data, however. I would say that they give you ample access to it.
What they don't let you do is utilize their service to export all your data directly t
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Do I have the right to access the data of my friends? That is the heart of the matter. I don't care about my data, I already have it.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
You have a right to access data of your friends that they allow you to access and that Facebook allows you to access, in the manner that they choose to permit that access.
Much like you have a right to see this comment response on slashdot in response to yours.
If slashdot so chose, they could decline to accept it, and decline to grant you the right to see it.
Just like FB could decline you the right to see a copy of a friend's profile page.
But FB doesn't, they give you the ability to view your friend
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Because of the obvious abuses that can be committed with those credentials under your name. And you are responsible if you release those credentials.
It's not even allowed [facebook.com] to release, it's a specific violation of the contract that you have agreed to when you signup for an account on facebook.
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
People are more than just dumb when they sign up to things like Facebook, Skype, and nowadays just about any other social networking site / application. How many spam email / invites do you get from people you know who just signed up to Facebook and they (were stupid enough to) let Facebook into all their email accounts, IM contact lists by giving the website the user
social network of social networks (Score:5, Funny)
This is handwaving (Score:5, Insightful)
"Facebook improperly restricts its users' access to their private information,"
Huh, what? You entered the data in your profile. Naturally, you have the data, at least, if you chose to keep a copy of it.
Facebook.com's terms of service don't contain any clause or term of use where they guarantee they will provide you any data you have entered for free access by any third party application or service.
This is as if you published a book on an online website, and a third-party decides to sue the website, because you signed up with a third-party, giving the third-party permission to reprint, but your book-publishing website chooses not to cooperate.
Just because the information is yours, doesn't mean you have a right to authorize someone to scrape it from an online service you have posted it to. That online service has an interest and a right to control the terms and conditions under which their servers may be accessed.
Re: (Score:2)
I'm not allowed to write a script that logs into my FB account and gets all my pictures for me? I can't give someone else my FB log/pass and let them do it for me (automated or not)? FB agrees it's my data, and I have access to it through their provided web interface. I'm not asking for a special XML pipe or anything. I'd be kind
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Ignoring the fact that all the pictures are downsized and not the original pictures you would want.
who honestly uploads files to facebook as a means of storage? It's not the purpose of the site.
Re:This is handwaving (Score:4, Insightful)
Parent
Re:This is handwaving (Score:4, Insightful)
So long as your action does not violate any term of service, and if those terms of service mean you end up having to right click on every single image, so be it - but your stinky 3rd party friend over there, he ain't welcome. Facebook TOS. Understand? It don't matter a damn how much you trust this other entity, facebook do not want their site scraped - and frankly, they have a right to be pissed, it is, after all, their website, and you accepted the rules when you signed on. End of story.
Parent
Re: (Score:2)
No, their rules can't be above the law. In my country at least, any rule saying they'll keep the data even if you're against it (when you try to leave them, for example) is illegal, as you have the legal right to force them to delete your data.
That's what this suits are trying to prove: if Facebook can legally prevent this kind of access.
Re: (Score:2)
But FB is not in your country, so you can't force them to give you your data.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Is Facebook not using the APIs provided by the webmail providers for this purpose?
I don't know, but it's irrelevant to my point. My point is that Facebook provides this feature through the goodwill of other sites in providing user granted acccess to them via third parties. At the same time, Facebook refuses the same sort of goodwill towards other sites. It seems hypocritical to me.
Missing the "Who Gives a Shit" Tag (Score:2, Informative)
Seriously. Facebook, Myspace, WAYN, Twitter, all of that garbage.