shekared was one of a number of readers to write in to tell a similar story. He says "I'm an American currently living and working in Chongqing, China. As of 9am (UTC +8) China began blocking google.com, gmail.com, google analytics and many if not most other google sites other than google.cn. Internet speed for connections outside the mainland have in general have come to a crawl. Surprisingly this has yet to pick up major coverage in the press. Using an open proxy or VPN for connection to hosts outside of the mainland continues to allow access to google, as does connecting directly to a google.com IP address.
As of 6pm (UTC +8) access to gmail and google.com have returned to normal."
We know who you are, we were just conducting tests and installing tools to enhance your dedicated internet connection.
Now that you have made this public, could you come to the local authorities station right away so we can settle things up ?
If you do not come, we will have to go get you at your work place and we would like to avoid this embarrassment for yourself. We also have enabled airport and border checks for yourself so you won't be allowed to leave the country before we meet.
Regards, Liu Cheng Security officer, Republic of China
They are both Republic of China, one is the Peoples Republic of China, the other is the Democratic Republic of China. They both call themselves "The Republic of China" internally. The Democratic Republic is normally the one to have the descriptor dropped in the west however.
What the hell are you talking about? There is no "Democratic Republic of China". It's just the "Republic of China". And mainland China *does* refer to itself as the People's Republic of China internally.
A Chinese passport says "People's republic of China" (PRC), and a Taiwanese passport says "Republic of China" (ROC) Supermarkets in China will often have imported goods under the label "Chinese Taiwan"
Let's leave the details for diplomats, our government overlords, and deranged Chinese nationalists to squabble over.
History has shown that a list of nationalists that aren't deranged would be very short indeed. Nationalism and religion share a very high derangement factor. And that's what makes them both very effective tools in motivating masses of people to do the authoritarian's dirty work for them, with great enthusiasm. It doesn't matter what country they live in. The disease is global.
They both call themselves "The Republic of China" internally.
Internally, the PRC's official name is pronounced: "Zhonghua renmin gongheguo" (sadly/. doesn't seem to work with Chinese characters). That "renmin" bit means "the people", whereas thee other two words mean "China" and "Republic" respectively. In English, they usually just call themselves "China" these days, even in official documents like a Chinese visa, but when they use the full name, they always put the "People's" bit in.
it sounds like a simple case of a misconfigured great wall of china. of course, ill stay tuned for the round-the-clock coverage from CNN on this critical human rights violation.
It also said that connecting to the google.com IP address worked, which implies that the failure was in DNS. I've had my ISP's DNS cache occasionally fail to return results, or return an invalid cached result a few times. Doing it for a site as big as Google is embarrassing, but not unheard of.
It seems to me that google is one of the sites on the internet that make china's censorship work much more difficult. It's not hard to imagine that they'd like google gone for good. Unfortunately, google is a very real part of a lot of people's lives.
Is it possible that this (and other similar actions) are attempts to see if they would be able to get away with blocking google for a longer period of time, and not cause a mass uproar?
I have a great idea! Let's show our support for Democracy and condemn the actions of the fascist dicatorship with a big shopping spree at Walmart. Maybe if we give these guys 500 billion dollars a year, they will be nice to us and freedom will reign and shower everyone with joy!
The sad part is that few care enough about Democracy, Liberty, and Freedom (add Western Liberal Tradition Value here) to pay higher prices for non-Chinese (or other Slave State) products. Of course, many care enough to endure hardship and risk life and limb in Iraq and Afghanistan to promote those same values (as they genuinely believe). Strange, isn't it?
I wish people would stop lumping democracy in with liberty and freedom. Liberty and freedom are goals, democracy is a tool for obtaining that goal. It is not universally useful. By elevating democracy to a goal in and of itself, you harm the causes of liberty and freedom.
I don't see where Authoritarian or Anarchism ever effectively promoted Liberty, Freedom, or any other Liberal Western value. Authoritarian states always limit or deny these ideals and Anarchist states always fail to defend the citizenry against outside aggression.
Have you tried to buy non-Chinese products lately? I have, when purchasing power tools and hand tools. So far, I'm 2 for 5 at finding the right product IN ANY PRICE RANGE that's not marked "Made in China." The metal Vise-Grips were made in the USA and the hedge shears were made in Mexico, with parts from Taiwan and Vietnam. The corded electric drills were all from China. The routers were all from China, except one professional-grade model far beyond what I needed. The wet-dry vacs were all made in Chi
Funny thing is, that there are more Western made products at Wally world these days, though Target remains a front-end for China (little there is NOT made in china). What is funny is that I have noticed that generics at places like King Soopers and safeway is being made In America, Mexico and Canada. Perhaps America can get the trade imbalance back into shape. My guess is that if oil continues upwards slowly, we will see more items move back to the west, and more trade by countries that are close.
And of course, walmart itself is a fascist dictatorship if you think about it. A rather hostile fascist dictatorship that economically destroys local small businesses, lowers overall GDP of the area, and subverts nations' economic control. IMO it is worse than China, it's like early stages of the soviet union but without communism.
walmart itself is a fascist dictatorship if you think about it.
Close, as various people have pointed out that it satisfies one of the primary features of fascism: The close ties between the business and your local government. (Yes, people in the US do mostly use "fascist" as an epithet that's empty of meaning, but the term has a historic definition. Close ties between government and business is one of the important pieces of that definition. Use of patriotism and religion rather than logic or science are t
I'd block them too. In fact the practice of blocking google analytics isn't unheard of at all outside of China. It only wastes bandwidth and google/site owners have too much information on your surfing habits already. All these statistics/advertising things just slow shit down and don't really do anything for you.
im traveling in china for the last 6 weeks and the state of internet connections here is very random.
domestic sites, like the immensely popular QQ and baidu, are always _very_ responsive.
google sometimes gets a slow down to the extend that it is nearly unusable (that really help people here to move over to the super fast and slightly more chineese friendly baidu).
the main thing is the randomness, if it is connectivity/ congestion issues, or some conspiracy: no-one knows.
After living in China for a while, I got the distinct impression that there was the "Great Wall" as well as local level monitoring and filtering (at least for foreigners). A couple doors down, there were always random people coming in and out of one of the apartments, and it would get quiet when my internet was being used. I had trouble accessing some sites, so one night I set everything up with encryption and Tor. The next morning, all of them were extremely distressed-looking and bleary eyed (the first ti
Give them a week with no google, no gmail, no google maps, and see what kind of reaction the chinese government gets. Then say they can have their google back when they agree to stop blocking it.
Chinese Govt WANTS that. They are busy pushing Baidu, and about to push Baidu into western world. Right now, Baidu controls ~65% of chinese search, while Google is only ~25%. The reason is that Chinese gov PUSHES Baidu and creates rules to help them. For example, Baidu copied Google's 'Im feeling Lucky', so the gov told Google to no longer allow it because it was leading to too many porn sites, but did not do the same on Baidu. What was interesting is that a study was done, it showed that Baidu had either t
does the outlay of that page look familiar to you?
for example, if my gmail account in china is unreliable- due to no fault of google, but unreliable nonetheless, that means i would tend to use some other email provider for that vital service. for baidu, all you have to do is have a fellow nationalist stooge in the government hit the flicker switch on google's traffic every now and then. since china is filtering everything anyway via centralized national authority, that's not hard to arrange
its a subtle and effective form of protectionism, something which the usa and other trading partners of china have noticed a severe uptick of recently, due to the global economic climate. which is especially hypocritical, since china, as a major exporter, is always complaining about protectionism
HONG KONG -- China has begun a concerted effort to keep its export economy humming, even as demand for its goods has plummeted with the global downturn.
Risking the ire of the United States and other trading partners, the Chinese government has quietly started adopting policies aimed at encouraging exports while curbing imports, even though China, as one of the world's largest exporters, has aggressively criticized protectionism in other countries.
The government has sharply expanded three programs to help exporters, giving them larger tax rebates, more generous loans from state-owned banks to finance trade, and more government-paid travel to promote themselves at trade shows around the world.
At the same time, Beijing has banned all local, provincial and national government agencies from buying imported goods except in cases where no local substitute exists.
How do you know it is not a DNS issue from your ISP? You can still access it through IP, don't you. If it is filtering, I doubt it can still working that way. Because it is in China, so any technical issue must be government doing evil.
Yes because obviously he's complaining that "The great evil china is violating my rights".
No.. it simply stated that china started blocking google. When one of the most censorship happy regimes starts blocking the biggest search provider in the world IT IS NEWS.
Sure, they CAN do as they please. That doesn't mean they're going to make correct/good decisions.
Saying that something is okay as long as it's not covered by existing international law is saying "do anything you want as long as the rest of us haven't thought of it yet." Indeed, international law barely exists - at core it's nothing more than the various treaties and agreements between states. It tends to have very little to do with individuals. There is no international Congress that can pass a law that affects all nations - don't even get me started on the UN (or as I've taken to calling it lately, the League of United Nations).
If China wanted to execute all couples who had more than two children, they could do so. It wouldn't be against any international law. Does that make it right? Does that mean humanitarian organizations should back off and shut up? Hell no.
Being a sovereign nation gives you the ABILITY (not the right) to do as you wish in many circumstances. It sure as hell doesn't give a "Mandate of Heaven" that says all your decisions will be correct and good for people.
Sure, censoring Google may seem like a small thing, but compare it to the censorship that still exists regarding things like the Tiananmen square massacre - or as it's euphemized in China, the "June 4th incident." It's still a completely forbidden topic in media and print. That's the kind of BS that overarching censorship can lead to.
Correct or good decisions for whom? You as an American?
Yes, him as an American, or me as a Brit. Or you as a... whatever you are. Us, collectively, as people with subjective ethical systems. Being aware of certain types of behaviour[1] allows us to make judgements on whether these countries are, collectively, following an ethical system we regard as compatible with our own. If they are not, then we have the option of not visiting them, not doing business with them or (in extreme cases) supporting rebellions in these countries. Making ethical decisions is a large part of what being human entails. If you are not comfortable with it, then pick a mass media outlet to make these determinations for you; it's easier than thinking.
[1] In this case, it sounds like someone just messed up with a DNS cache configuration, rather than doing anything malicious, but let's talk hypotheticals for a bit.
I'm not necessarily disagreeing (though I'm not sure that supporting rebellions can ever be ethical), I'm just playing Devil's Advocate on the grounds that there seem to be a lot of stories on here that seem to be along the lines of "[insert country] doesn't do things the way the US does, so lets all criticise" when there are a lot of things that need to be fixed in their own back yard first.
For example:-
Britain - Surveillance society (*cough* Echelon *cough*)
Britain - Surveillance society (*cough* Echelon *cough*)
Are you seriously suggesting that no brits are criticizing this?
EU - Fines US companies for breaking EU law (oh noes)
Technically, it was EU departments of an US company that got fined. EU cannot fine a US company. And why should a company be exempt from laws just because their mother firm resides in another country?
I'm British BTW, and getting tired of all the rhetoric and hypocrisy
I have great respect for America's determination to protect freedom and free speech. That word means a lot to you, as it does to me.
But wait, before you call it a Tiananmen square "massacre" - do you consider that ONE HUNDRED THOUSAND [iraqbodycount.org] people are now dead in Iraq. Last week, a drone killed 140 people in Afganistan, mostly innocents.
So, as opposed to thousands of their own people killed by the Chinese, you went to another country and killed much much more.
I am not saying it is worse; just saying that taking a
Well, first off, a large number of those 100k dead aren't due to US bombing/gunfire/etc. I haven't scoured the site for exact numbers, so I can't give you hard percentages and so on. In fact, so far in 2009, more people are being killed per day in suicide attacks than with gunfire/executions. I know you didn't explicitly say they were all due to the US, but it was implied.
Second, there's a moral difference between shooting at someone intending to kill them and someone getting caught in the crossfire du
China is a sovereign nation and can do as it pleases within its own borders as long as no international laws are broken; Trade restriction. And EU is bringing that up to UN. Just like America did recently about CHina restricting EXPORTS of Steel making minerals. China is cheating all the way to the bank, and the west either needs to crack down on China, or better yet, SLOWLY raise similar barriers. For example, slowly drop the dollar and Euro against the Yuan on imports. That will encourage China to free their money. Likewise, if China does not drop their trade barriers like they agreed to do by 2002, then we should slowly and methodically raise ours.
Please come to the local station (Score:5, Funny)
Dear Sir,
We know who you are, we were just conducting tests and installing tools to enhance your dedicated internet connection.
Now that you have made this public, could you come to the local authorities station right away so we can settle things up ?
If you do not come, we will have to go get you at your work place and we would like to avoid this embarrassment for yourself. We also have enabled airport and border checks for yourself so you won't be allowed to leave the country before we meet.
Regards,
Liu Cheng
Security officer,
Republic of China
Re:Please come to the local station (Score:5, Informative)
Parent
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
They are both Republic of China, one is the Peoples Republic of China, the other is the Democratic Republic of China. They both call themselves "The Republic of China" internally. The Democratic Republic is normally the one to have the descriptor dropped in the west however.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Please come to the local station (Score:5, Informative)
You're correct.
A Chinese passport says "People's republic of China" (PRC), and a Taiwanese passport says "Republic of China" (ROC)
Supermarkets in China will often have imported goods under the label "Chinese Taiwan"
Let's leave the details for diplomats, our government overlords, and deranged Chinese nationalists to squabble over.
Parent
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
...deranged Chinese nationalists...
History has shown that a list of nationalists that aren't deranged would be very short indeed. Nationalism and religion share a very high derangement factor. And that's what makes them both very effective tools in motivating masses of people to do the authoritarian's dirty work for them, with great enthusiasm. It doesn't matter what country they live in. The disease is global.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Internally, the PRC's official name is pronounced: "Zhonghua renmin gongheguo" (sadly /. doesn't seem to work with Chinese characters). That "renmin" bit means "the people", whereas thee other two words mean "China" and "Republic" respectively. In English, they usually just call themselves "China" these days, even in official documents like a Chinese visa, but when they use the full name, they always put the "People's" bit in.
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Slashdot (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Can you still access www.castleargh.com?
Block Google Since Bing Will Play Ball (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Block Google Since Bing Will Play Ball (Score:4, Informative)
Parent
calm down chinaphiles... (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
My first thought was 'Yeah, because it can't possibly be a problem with the internet... It has to be China doing something nasty.'
Hell, the article itself said service came back for some before others... That in itself says that it's probably the net and not China.
Nothing to see here, move along.
Re: (Score:2)
That's what people are afraid will happen.
Re:calm down chinaphiles... (Score:5, Insightful)
Parent
Gauging response? (Score:3, Interesting)
It seems to me that google is one of the sites on the internet that make china's censorship work much more difficult. It's not hard to imagine that they'd like google gone for good. Unfortunately, google is a very real part of a lot of people's lives.
Is it possible that this (and other similar actions) are attempts to see if they would be able to get away with blocking google for a longer period of time, and not cause a mass uproar?
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Not gauging response. Sending message.
"We can destroy your business in here on whim. Now, be nice and play by the rules."
And people wonder why Google turned evil while ago and cooperates with censor-states.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Google is a real part of YOUR life. Most Chinese haven't even heard of it.
In any event, google.cn is apparently still available.
Let's all go shop at Walmart to Protest! (Score:5, Funny)
I have a great idea! Let's show our support for Democracy and condemn the actions of the fascist dicatorship with a big shopping spree at Walmart. Maybe if we give these guys 500 billion dollars a year, they will be nice to us and freedom will reign and shower everyone with joy!
Re:Let's all go shop at Walmart to Protest! (Score:4, Insightful)
The sad part is that few care enough about Democracy, Liberty, and Freedom (add Western Liberal Tradition Value here) to pay higher prices for non-Chinese (or other Slave State) products. Of course, many care enough to endure hardship and risk life and limb in Iraq and Afghanistan to promote those same values (as they genuinely believe). Strange, isn't it?
Parent
Re:Let's all go shop at Walmart to Protest! (Score:5, Insightful)
Parent
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
I don't see where Authoritarian or Anarchism ever effectively promoted Liberty, Freedom, or any other Liberal Western value. Authoritarian states always limit or deny these ideals and Anarchist states always fail to defend the citizenry against outside aggression.
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Have you tried to buy non-Chinese products lately? I have, when purchasing power tools and hand tools. So far, I'm 2 for 5 at finding the right product IN ANY PRICE RANGE that's not marked "Made in China." The metal Vise-Grips were made in the USA and the hedge shears were made in Mexico, with parts from Taiwan and Vietnam. The corded electric drills were all from China. The routers were all from China, except one professional-grade model far beyond what I needed. The wet-dry vacs were all made in Chi
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
And of course, walmart itself is a fascist dictatorship if you think about it. A rather hostile fascist dictatorship that economically destroys local small businesses, lowers overall GDP of the area, and subverts nations' economic control. IMO it is worse than China, it's like early stages of the soviet union but without communism.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
walmart itself is a fascist dictatorship if you think about it.
Close, as various people have pointed out that it satisfies one of the primary features of fascism: The close ties between the business and your local government. (Yes, people in the US do mostly use "fascist" as an epithet that's empty of meaning, but the term has a historic definition. Close ties between government and business is one of the important pieces of that definition. Use of patriotism and religion rather than logic or science are t
Google analytics (Score:2, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
the difference is usually it's the user blocking them outside of china via adblock or whatever
my experiences... (Score:4, Interesting)
im traveling in china for the last 6 weeks and the state of internet connections here is very random.
domestic sites, like the immensely popular QQ and baidu, are always _very_ responsive.
google sometimes gets a slow down to the extend that it is nearly unusable (that really help people here to move over to the super fast and slightly more chineese friendly baidu).
the main thing is the randomness, if it is connectivity/ congestion issues, or some conspiracy: no-one knows.
local plus great wall (Score:2, Interesting)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
What the hell do you do that you have a whole apartment full of people watching your every move?
It's like a glitch in the Matrix (Score:5, Funny)
They just changed something.
Google should block China (Score:2, Interesting)
Give them a week with no google, no gmail, no google maps, and see what kind of reaction the chinese government gets. Then say they can have their google back when they agree to stop blocking it.
BIG MISTAKE (Score:3, Insightful)
Trends (Score:2)
20$ on China being the first country in the 21st century to make encryption illegal. Things are only going to be worse, not better.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
regardless of china's public claims (Score:5, Interesting)
making google unreliable is a subtle argument for chinese citizens to depend upon chinese competitors to google, such as baidu
http://www.baidu.com/ [baidu.com]
does the outlay of that page look familiar to you?
for example, if my gmail account in china is unreliable- due to no fault of google, but unreliable nonetheless, that means i would tend to use some other email provider for that vital service. for baidu, all you have to do is have a fellow nationalist stooge in the government hit the flicker switch on google's traffic every now and then. since china is filtering everything anyway via centralized national authority, that's not hard to arrange
its a subtle and effective form of protectionism, something which the usa and other trading partners of china have noticed a severe uptick of recently, due to the global economic climate. which is especially hypocritical, since china, as a major exporter, is always complaining about protectionism
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/24/business/economy/24yuan.html [nytimes.com]
DNS issue (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Local Laws (Score:4, Insightful)
Yes because obviously he's complaining that "The great evil china is violating my rights".
No.. it simply stated that china started blocking google. When one of the most censorship happy regimes starts blocking the biggest search provider in the world IT IS NEWS.
Your rock, go back under it.
Parent
Re:Local Laws (Score:5, Insightful)
Saying that something is okay as long as it's not covered by existing international law is saying "do anything you want as long as the rest of us haven't thought of it yet." Indeed, international law barely exists - at core it's nothing more than the various treaties and agreements between states. It tends to have very little to do with individuals. There is no international Congress that can pass a law that affects all nations - don't even get me started on the UN (or as I've taken to calling it lately, the League of United Nations).
If China wanted to execute all couples who had more than two children, they could do so. It wouldn't be against any international law. Does that make it right? Does that mean humanitarian organizations should back off and shut up? Hell no.
Being a sovereign nation gives you the ABILITY (not the right) to do as you wish in many circumstances. It sure as hell doesn't give a "Mandate of Heaven" that says all your decisions will be correct and good for people.
Sure, censoring Google may seem like a small thing, but compare it to the censorship that still exists regarding things like the Tiananmen square massacre - or as it's euphemized in China, the "June 4th incident." It's still a completely forbidden topic in media and print. That's the kind of BS that overarching censorship can lead to.
Parent
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Correct or good decisions for whom? You as an American?
Re:Local Laws (Score:5, Insightful)
Correct or good decisions for whom? You as an American?
Yes, him as an American, or me as a Brit. Or you as a... whatever you are. Us, collectively, as people with subjective ethical systems. Being aware of certain types of behaviour[1] allows us to make judgements on whether these countries are, collectively, following an ethical system we regard as compatible with our own. If they are not, then we have the option of not visiting them, not doing business with them or (in extreme cases) supporting rebellions in these countries. Making ethical decisions is a large part of what being human entails. If you are not comfortable with it, then pick a mass media outlet to make these determinations for you; it's easier than thinking.
[1] In this case, it sounds like someone just messed up with a DNS cache configuration, rather than doing anything malicious, but let's talk hypotheticals for a bit.
Parent
Re: (Score:2)
For example:-
Re: (Score:2)
Britain - Surveillance society (*cough* Echelon *cough*)
Are you seriously suggesting that no brits are criticizing this?
EU - Fines US companies for breaking EU law (oh noes)
Technically, it was EU departments of an US company that got fined. EU cannot fine a US company. And why should a company be exempt from laws just because their mother firm resides in another country?
I'm British BTW, and getting tired of all the rhetoric and hypocrisy
Heh.
Re: (Score:2)
Not at all. Just that its our business and our problem to sort out.
Re: (Score:2)
I have great respect for America's determination to protect freedom and free speech. That word means a lot to you, as it does to me.
But wait, before you call it a Tiananmen square "massacre" - do you consider that ONE HUNDRED THOUSAND [iraqbodycount.org] people are now dead in Iraq. Last week, a drone killed 140 people in Afganistan, mostly innocents.
So, as opposed to thousands of their own people killed by the Chinese, you went to another country and killed much much more.
I am not saying it is worse; just saying that taking a
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Second, there's a moral difference between shooting at someone intending to kill them and someone getting caught in the crossfire du
Re:Local Laws (Score:5, Insightful)
Trade restriction. And EU is bringing that up to UN. Just like America did recently about CHina restricting EXPORTS of Steel making minerals. China is cheating all the way to the bank, and the west either needs to crack down on China, or better yet, SLOWLY raise similar barriers. For example, slowly drop the dollar and Euro against the Yuan on imports. That will encourage China to free their money. Likewise, if China does not drop their trade barriers like they agreed to do by 2002, then we should slowly and methodically raise ours.
Parent
Re: (Score:2)
We did. They was reagan and W.