MediaDefender Buys MediaSentry For $136,000 (Not $20M) 141
newtley writes "SafeNet paid $20 million for MediaSentry in 2005, but has just sold it to rival MediaDefender for a paltry $136,000, with a promise of more later. MediaSentry's new owner says the combination will allow it to 'dramatically expand its effectiveness.' Is it time for an official government inquiry into MediaSentry and the RIAA? A Chicago student said she was planning on killing herself because the RIAA promised her she'd land in court unless she paid almost $10,000 to 'settle' an alleged copyright infringement. She 'couldn't sleep, couldn't study, couldn't live a normal life because of the worry.' The RIAA 'evidence' came from MediaSentry, accused of operating illegally."
Re:Why? (Score:5, Insightful)
Fleeing the country at that age and with those limited resources is worse than suicide. The countries where it's reasonably safe to flee to, even with money, are extradition countries, so she'll be right back in the US in time for summer. And a lot of those non-extradition countries are inhospitable to a poor teenager, so she'll just die or end up a meth-addicted prostitute.
This glowing orb of positivity brought to you by perspective.
Re:Why? (Score:5, Insightful)
Oh give me a break. They'd get a civil judgment. You don't even have to flee the country to escape those. It's called Chapter 7 [wikipedia.org] and it's the first thing I would do if I was a student facing a $10,000 judgment from RIAA. If she's like most students she probably doesn't have many assets and they are likely all be exempt. In other words she'd lose nothing but the bankruptcy filing fee and the time it took to appear at the hearing.
If that's all it takes to make her suicidal then she really needs to seek some outside help. In the grand game known as life she's going to face many challenges that are far more scary than a RIAA action. Better learn how to cope with them now.
You're Hoping for a lot more Change... (Score:4, Insightful)
... than is within reason if you're waiting for a government investigation of the record companies and/or their cronies. The party of Hollywood is in charge of the government, and the RIAA/MPAA are all paid up in their contributions.
Re:Why? (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Why? (Score:5, Insightful)
She'd also lose all her liquid assets(if any)
Umm, no, she'd lose her non-exempt assets. I'm not familiar with the specifics in her state but in my state you can exempt up to $2,500 of cash, "tools of the trade", family heirlooms, an automobile worth less than $5,000, etc, etc, etc. The overwhelming majority of Chapter 7s are "no-asset" cases, meaning all of the assets of the debtor are exempt. How many students do you know that have large enough net worths to have to worry about having non-exempt assets?
and she'd have a bad credit rating for the next 10 years
There are worse things in life than a bad credit rating and you'd be surprised how quickly your credit rebounds after a bankruptcy. My bankruptcy was three years ago and my FICO score was 757 the last time I checked. I haven't run into any problems obtaining credit, even after the economy took a nosedive.
And 10k is the settlement, not the judgement.
So what? Let them get a judgment for more than that if they think they can. It will make the bankruptcy even easier to file.
Re:Why? (Score:3, Insightful)
Exactly. The RIAA would have to track her down in the country she moved to and then get a court there to rule that she had to pay up. Good luck with that, though, because foreign courts are rather reluctant to involve themselves of civil matters that happened outside of their jurisdiction. In fact, they pretty much flat out refuse to.
For that matter, she could flee to Canada or Mexico.
Re:Why? (Score:5, Insightful)
I suspect she's young, struggling in any case, and inexperienced in legal matters. The RIAA tactics are fearsome, and they're deliberately calculated to induce the state of mind she's in now. They've evoked the kinds of feelings of helplessness or hopelessness that can lead to suicidal thoughts in vulnerable people. It's to be hoped that she's able to secure some kind of counseling (or legal counsel) to put the situation into perspective. If you look back, you don't see the RIAA attacking well-established, well-heeled middle aged people. They go after the young, the inexperienced, the poor, the elderly, and the sick--just the sorts of people who are vulnerable. They'd probably be delighted by a suicide. It would scare a few more victims.
Re:Why? (Score:4, Insightful)
That was their own damn stupidity. Why would you agree to pay a debt that can't be collected upon and which you have no legal obligation to pay?
Re:You're Hoping for a lot more Change... (Score:5, Insightful)
Owning a portfolio of Senators, Federal Judges, and misc. Whitehouse staffers is not "paid up" in any sense of the words, unless of course you'd like to say that the Democrats or Republican are 'paid up' on their contributions. They say the only good way to rob a bank is to own one. It looks as though this is part of the **AA's new business model - buy the bank, then steal it blind rather than just rob the customers as they come in to deposit their paychecks.
By owning a large enough part of the Federal government, the **AA is able to convince the rest of government that they need international copyright trade agreements that are sealed due to national security. If there really were something we could call the "mark of the beast" I'm willing to bet that it has the **AA members logos displayed aesthetically beneath it.
I'm of a mind to say that even if this girl did share audio files, there is no morality system in the world that is recognized under any name other than evil that justifies how the **AA are treating their own customers, grandkids, mothers, grandparents etc. To paraphrase Mr Gump, "fucking assholes do as fucking assholes do" and no amount of apologetizing will get them a reputation better than that of pond scum.
Re:Why? (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Why? (Score:3, Insightful)
She 'couldn't sleep, couldn't study, couldn't live (Score:1, Insightful)
I guess if I committed a crime (even a crime that the slashdot community thinks should *not* be a crime) and was being sued for it, I'd expect to have trouble sleeping, studying and living.
Flame away, but there is one point you cannot make: That she did not steal.
Maybe it should be legal, but it isn't, she knew it, she did it anyway.
Re:Why? (Score:4, Insightful)
There's no need for any country-fleeing for someone without significant assets or income. Just pull a Bernie Goetz: do nothing. Let the RIAA obtain all the judgments they can. Declare bankruptcy (the BARF bill a few years ago made it harder, but someone with no assets and low income still has the option). Laugh at the RIAA.
There's also no point in threatening suicide. For students to threaten or even attempt and/or complete suicide over these cases is playing directly into the RIAAs hands; they're trying to frighten people into obeying them, and convincing people that the disobedience is worse than death by one's own hand is an effective motivator.
Re:Why? (Score:3, Insightful)
Being sentenced to pay-off ~10 million dollars in RIAA damages is equivalent to a life sentence because you are working, not for yourself, but as RIAA's wage slave. So if you've decided not to be a lifelong slave, but instead to go-out in the blaze of glory, might as well take the CEO and board of directors with you.
Re:Kill yourselves over 10k? (Score:3, Insightful)
The girl needs to get a grip. Just wait till she gets older, screws up, buys a house bigger than she can afford, runs up 30k in credit cards that gets ramped up to 100k because the overlimit charges are just enough to wipe payments out, bringing on more overlimit charges... ...and then she finally has a REAL reason to kill herself, or what do you want to tell us?
Just because some people are in the doo deeply enough that an archeological dig wouldn't find them doesn't mean that I should be happy when I only got it up past my nose.
Re:Why? (Score:4, Insightful)
That's what I just can't grasp. Suing students.
What do you have here: Someone who is about 20, who already has racked up around 50k in debt for his tuition, and then you go an sue him for a bazillion (or just one tiny million if he wishes to settle out of court).
So you start your life with over a million down. What would you do? Know what I'd do? Wellfare. Yes, exactly. Work? Am I nuts? You won't get out of debt ever in your life, living the life of a minimum wage slave no matter how much you earn for the rest of your days. Why the heck should I try to pay a debt that was created basically by racketeering and extortion? Often enough without the defendent breaking any laws, his only crime being that he cannot stand up in court against the allegations.
I'm actually waiting for the first to ponder that his life is over anyway, so why not arm up and take a few of those with him that ended it.
Re:Kill yourselves over 10k? (Score:3, Insightful)
.and then she finally has a REAL reason to kill herself, or what do you want to tell us?
See, why would you kill yourself though, in a situation like that. Why not kill all the people that keep calling you. That's what I don't get. You get all these guys that lost it all, and take it out on their families...I don't condone what these people do, but, if you are going to do it, then, you may as well take one for the team and take out a couple of incompetent CEOs, politicians, and what not. Seriously, if one of these people that went on a kiling spree went and shot up Davos instead, do you really think the public would be outraged? I'm not saying its right. It's not.
Just because some people are in the doo deeply enough that an archeological dig wouldn't find them doesn't mean that I should be happy when I only got it up past my nose
Sometimes you just have to "man up".
Re:Let's have pity (Score:3, Insightful)
No? Then why are we all in pieces over the girl in legal trouble (of her own making)?
Given the "evidence" came from MediaSentry, how can you be so sure?
Further, it's not that she's being punished at all but the huge imbalance between the damage done, and the payment claimed. If MediaSentry's employees were to be put to death most Slashdotters would rightfully complain, just as we probably wouldn't if the girl had to pay only a $100 bill if she lost her case fair and square.
Re:Why? (Score:3, Insightful)
Here's the catch. Ever try to finish college with a judgement over your head? Ever try to keep your student loans for your last 2 or 3 years of college after that judgement has been filed (or worse, you've declared bankruptcy)? Or hope that the destruction of your credit (via the judgement or bankruptcy) wont prevent you from getting the job you want (many big employers now do credit checks)?
Or does mom and dad have to bail you out (pay the extortion fees to the RIAA) to ensure that you can continue to go to school and continue to get loans to pay your remaining years?
I dont think it's too much of a gamble on the part of the RIAA... and it is definitely a planned one.