Researchers Can ID Anonymous Twitterers 108
narramissic writes "In a paper set to be delivered at an upcoming security conference, University of Texas at Austin researchers showed how they were able to identify people who were on public social networks such as Twitter and Flickr by mapping out the connections surrounding their network of friends. From the ITworld article: 'Web site operators often share data about users with partners and advertisers after stripping it of any personally identifiable information such as names, addresses or birth dates. Arvind Narayanan and fellow researcher Vitaly Shmatikov found that by analyzing these 'anonymized' data sets, they could identify Flickr users who were also on Twitter about two-thirds of the time, depending on how much information they have to work with.'"
Re:Who promised? (Score:0, Funny)
Fine, who am I?
Re:Who promised? (Score:1, Funny)
or me?
Re:Who promised? (Score:4, Funny)
Clearly, you're both me.
Tin foil! (Score:5, Funny)
This is new technology to me (Score:4, Funny)
The thing that confuses me is the acronym "FRIEND", I have looked in all my technical references and I can't find that tool.
Re:Who promised? (Score:1, Funny)
I read that and thought "19? did he just pull that out of his ass? 1 2 3... 19! He actually counted the number of words in the quoted text!"
I can ID anyone using Twitter (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Who promised? (Score:1, Funny)
Fine, who am I?
But I know what dude I am. I'm the dude playin' the dude, disguised as another dude.
Re:Rats... (Score:1, Funny)
they are after me.
Re:Twits (Score:5, Funny)
That's right - The Netherlands are hiring again!
Re:Who promised? (Score:3, Funny)
I thought it was just because he had a "wide stance".