Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Privacy Communications

Verizon Wants To Share Your Personal Information 236

hyades1 writes "Gizmodo reports that Verizon is sending out notification letters infested with virtually-indecipherable legalese. In their sneaky, underhanded way, they're informing you that you have 45 days to opt out of their plan to share your personal data with 'affiliates, agents and parent companies.' That data can include, but isn't limited to, 'services purchased (including specific calls you make and receive), billing info, technical info and location info.' If you view your statement on-line, you won't even get the letter. You'll have to access your account and view your messages. However, Read Write Web says the link provided there, called the 'Customer Proprietary Network Information Notice,' was listed as 'not available.' No doubt Verizon would like to reassure you that everyone they're going to hand your personal data over to will have your best interests at heart."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Verizon Wants To Share Your Personal Information

Comments Filter:
  • It possibly suggests (Score:5, Interesting)

    by mysidia ( 191772 ) on Sunday March 08, 2009 @03:48PM (#27114057)

    That Verizon perhaps has already been doing this information sharing. They just want to stop getting penalized [consumeraffairs.com] for various marketing activities they undertake.

    And court rulings [epic.org] that affirm the new regulations requiring opt-in consent.

    So the new regulations are finally making them take notice and be more forthcoming about when they share proprietary information??

    Verizon might be on the hot seat right now, but, I won't be surprised if notices like Verizon's or similar agreements start being seen from other carriers.

  • by TheGratefulNet ( 143330 ) on Sunday March 08, 2009 @04:03PM (#27114143)

    I don't carry a cellphone anymore. I hate being 'on call' like that when I'm away.

    one problem, though. have you notice that payphones are almost non-existant now? they are almost impossible to find.

  • by PolygamousRanchKid ( 1290638 ) on Sunday March 08, 2009 @04:07PM (#27114163)

    Become an "affiliate or agent" of Verizon, and you won't need to use ruses like "pretexting" to get the phone records of your targets.

    Good for employers, too, who want to check up on the private calls that its employees make with their own phones.

  • by Anonymous Coward on Sunday March 08, 2009 @04:27PM (#27114293)

    Several years ago, my local PBS station was begging for donations. I was about to call in and donate $50 when they said they would give you a 1-year subscription to Fast Company magazine if you dontated $60, so that's what I did. A few days later, I got a postcard in the mail thanking me for my donation and saying I would receive my subscription shortly, but my name was misspelled in a unique way. I never received a single issue of the magazine, but I got several solicitations from various charities with the same misspelling.

    A message to all corporations and non-profits: If someone gives you money for a donation, service, or product, be thankful for it and treat them with an ounce of respect instead of turning around and screwing them for a few extra pennies by selling their personal info.

    P.S. I never gave another penny to PBS again.

  • by Wrath0fb0b ( 302444 ) on Sunday March 08, 2009 @04:39PM (#27114345)

    We have contracts. I am a Verizon customer and I read this story and called up and now, I'm opted out (I offered to opt in for $5/month off my bill, about what I think that's worth, they declined). In the end-game, if VZ wouldn't agree to let me opt out, I'd consider other service providers, compare all my options, and pick the one I liked the most.

    For the masses that don't care to opt-out, they don't care! Giving out personal information is not an injury to people that don't care. I know it's impossible for /.ers to imagine that other people might have more a different set of priorities than they do, but it's a fact that different people care about different sets of things. Even people that care about the same set of things assign different weights and will come up with different tradeoffs. What's nice about a system of voluntary associations is that those sets of priorities can be efficiently mapped into different contract terms instead of everyone getting a one-sized-fits-all solution.

    I really cannot understand why some people believe that they have the right to dictate the terms under which someone sells them a service. If you went into the grocery store and saw a 6-pack of apples being sold for $1, would you demand (citing some clearly inalienable right) that they sell you a 5-pack of apples for $.80? If you don't want apples on the terms that the store is selling them, buy them from a different store. If no store has terms you approve of, then you have to admit the fact that no other human being will voluntarily give you his apples under those terms. Either change your terms, or start rationalizing to yourself your right to seize those apples from him involuntarily.

  • by Wowsers ( 1151731 ) on Sunday March 08, 2009 @05:35PM (#27114745) Journal
    If the UK's Data Protection Act had any teeth at all, they would have ruled the IP packet inspecting / changing Phorm system [wikipedia.org] illegal under existing laws, and not have the situation that the Phorm company is going around trying to suppress knowledge of their system to subscribers of the three scumbag internet providers that will roll out this system (BT, Virgin Media, TalkTalk).

    http://wikileaks.org/wiki/UK_media_suppressed_Phorm_survey_and_article%2C_2009 [wikileaks.org]

  • by game kid ( 805301 ) on Sunday March 08, 2009 @05:38PM (#27114767) Homepage

    The alternative, in my case (for the internet anyway - I don't use Verizon Wireless or any other cellphones), are anticompetitive [wikipedia.org], anticonsumer [yahoo.com], annoying (or worse) [wordpress.com] scum.

    Sorry, I gotta take potential bad math over such evil.

  • Re:boy am I glad (Score:4, Interesting)

    by AmigaMMC ( 1103025 ) on Sunday March 08, 2009 @05:45PM (#27114821)
    I had Verizon for 5 years and boy, am I happy that I dropped them like hot potatoes. I even had to fight them for 9 months for getting my due rebate. Moreover, I found out that they had me on collection for years because the idiot that I returned the phone to the day after purchasing it (it malfunctioned) forgot to do their paperwork. I had to get the FTC involved and finally they stopped asking for money. What's worse was that they don't communicate among departments otherwise they would have seen that I had an active line with payments made regularly.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Sunday March 08, 2009 @06:16PM (#27115065)

    There's an even more teethful Datenschutzgesetz (Data Protection Act) in Germany. Just guess who tried to trick me into an agreement -formulated exactly in the same legalese as mentioned- to renounce any protection of my personal data and therefore allow them to sell them. Vodafone.

  • Re:boy am I glad (Score:4, Interesting)

    by narcberry ( 1328009 ) on Sunday March 08, 2009 @06:19PM (#27115083) Journal

    If congress didn't lock these companies in place with huge piles of money, we might have some entrepreneurs entering the space with words like, "customer", "service", and "helpful" in their dictionary.

    Anyhow, I hope this presents an opportunity to end my contract with Verizon, I missed the last one they never mailed me.

  • by m6ack ( 922653 ) on Sunday March 08, 2009 @06:55PM (#27115327)

    Follow these instructions:

    1) Call Verizon.
    2) Have the representative explain "CPNI."
    3) Ask a couple of questions.
    4) Ask the representative to OPT-OUT of all your phones.

    You have just cost Verizon Wireless about $20.00 for that call.

  • Re:boy am I glad (Score:4, Interesting)

    by cbeaudry ( 706335 ) on Sunday March 08, 2009 @10:48PM (#27117159)

    I think the best option is to call them. Ask to speak to a supervisor.

    Tell them over the phone, you opt OUT and you want them to change any records necessary to make sure you are opted out.

    Ask them if they are NOT recording this they SHOULD be recording as you are recording it as well.

    Tell them if they do not opt you out immediately that you will sue them in court and it wont be pretty.

    Then... hope to god they make a mistake :)

    Im from Canada and Im usually not a litigious person. But these corporate bloodsucking companies need to get their ass handed to them.

You knew the job was dangerous when you took it, Fred. -- Superchicken

Working...