Apparent Suicide In Anthrax Case 339
penguin_dance passes along the news that a respected anthrax researcher, about to be indicted, has committed suicide. The FBI has been investigating the case since anthrax-contaminated letters were sent to the media and various politicians in 2001. The AP's coverage mentions that prosecutors intended to seek the death penalty. The suicide was not the one you might imagine if you've been following the story. "A top government scientist who helped the FBI analyze samples from the 2001 anthrax attacks has died in Maryland from an apparent suicide, just as the Justice Department was about to file criminal charges against him for the attacks, the Los Angeles Times has learned. Bruce E. Ivins, 62, who for the last 18 years worked at the government's elite biodefense research laboratories at Ft. Detrick, Md., had been informed of his impending prosecution... The extraordinary turn of events followed the government's payment in June of a settlement valued at $5.82 million to a former government scientist, Steven J. Hatfill, who was long targeted as the FBI's chief suspect despite a lack of any evidence that he had ever possessed anthrax."
Even more to ponder on this (Score:3, Informative)
Salon has a updated story today http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2008/08/01/anthrax/ [salon.com]
relating to false information provided to ABC news early on about the investigation. Really makes you wonder what was going on here.
Re:Motive? (Score:3, Informative)
Re:How do you spell, TERRORIST? (Score:5, Informative)
However, when Senator Jim Jeffords of Vermont announced in May 2001 that he was leaving the Republican caucus to become an independent and would caucus with Democrats, this returned control of the body to the Democrats and Daschle again became Majority Leader.
He was the Majority Leader during the anthrax attack because a Republican changed party affiliation and Daschle was the leader.
Re:Motive? (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Oh, the irony (Score:2, Informative)
Re:in this thread (Score:1, Informative)
Funny to see circletimessquare saying this, a rabid supporter of Bush policies and doctrine. Of course, the "government" did not do it. Except the anthrax was a strain held only by the government. Of course, Bush had no hand in it. Except the targets of the terrorist attacks (the media and those who were against Bush's power grab) benefited Bush. I wish Bush, immediately on assuming power in January 2001, had not dismantled the anti-terrorism apparatus Bill Clinton had put in place. We might not have had to endure 9/11. The Bush administration decision to funnel $40 million dollars to Afghanistan in the early months of his administration is also something I wish he had not done. Diverting our forces to Iraq instead of finishing the job in Afghanistan, that would be something I think most of us wish for. George Bush should tell us who was in his energy meetings in 2001. Seems things changed in the energy market between then and now. Under Clinton gas was $1.50 per gallon and better. Under Bush, we get $3.75 per gallon and worse. I think I know who did not sell us out to the oil interests.
The use of the Anthrax terrorist attacks to push forward foolhardy Bush policy (the invasion and occupation of Iraq, among others) needs greater scrutiny, especially the media complicity:
ABC News did not acknowledge its false claim until six years later, in 2007. ABC News has failed to inform the public from where it got its false information. One need only look to the Bush administration to see who ABC News is protecting.
Re:Prepare a press leak, Smitty, we have a patsy (Score:1, Informative)
The contention is that he committed suicide by overdosing on Tylenol w/codeine. If so, he must have taken a fistful of pills, thus destroying his liver with the acetaminophen. Is it possible to ingest a lethal dose of codeine?
Re:Oh, the irony (Score:3, Informative)
They got the things to use as weapons from a passing trucker who stopped, it's likely no one had anything with them on the bus.
Anyway, I don't know if they knew it at the time, but it's not likely confronting him right away would have changed anything. It doesn't take too many stabs to the chest with a hunting knife to kill someone.
Re:Motive? (Score:2, Informative)
It is quite possible for someone highly depressed to continue functioning in technical professions ("I've heard").
He was already a suicide risk. Whether prompted by the possibility of disgrace or by an "I can get out of all this bs" moment, we'll never know.
"Mentally ill" is well within the ballpark.