US Supreme Court Limits Patent Claims

Aire Libre and other readers noted a unanimous Supreme Court decision that denied LG Electronics's attempt to evade the first-sale doctrine by use of "business method" patents. LG licensed patents to Intel, then attempted to dictate what use Intel's customers could make of the Intel products incorporating LG patents. The decision (PDF) notes how easily patents can be written up as "business methods" to nullify the first-sale doctrine ("exhaustion") and to give the patent owner perpetual control downstream. Aire Libre adds, "That reasoning bodes well for copyright freedom as well, in light of the growing number of copyright holders who seek to nullify the Copyright Act's limitation on the distribution right by claiming the goods are 'licensed, not sold,' or subject to some restrictive EULA."

Re:Good work, men!

[afabbro]

One of the Supremes is a girl, you insensitive clod!

Re:Good work, men!

[Anonymous Coward]

Actually they all were you uninformed clod!

Re:Good work, men!

[Nikkos]

All of The Supremes were girls, you ignorant putz!

Re:It doesn't bode anything for copyright

[Anonymous Coward]

I think I'll patent the business process of....obtaining a patent. That will be the end of this nonsense once and for all. Bahaha!

Re:Interesting...

[Forbman]

"What about chainsaws?" -- Leatherface