Google Health Open Platform Is Great — Or Awful 179
JackPowers writes "The Google Health APIs enable portable, standardized, open architecture, extensible personal health records, which is nice but boring if they're just used to manage the paperwork of the doctor/patient relationship. But once the data is set free, all kinds of Web 1.0, Web 2.0 and Web 3.0 apps are possible. This article looks ahead 10 years at Best Case Scenarios. A follow-up article lists the Worst Case Scenarios."
Awful? (Score:3, Funny)
Great, Web *3.0* (Score:5, Funny)
Meaningless buzzwords run amok (Score:3, Funny)
Web 3.0? That's just silly.
Oh Hell (Score:5, Funny)
Great - or awful? (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Oh Hell (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Great, Web *3.0* (Score:4, Funny)
Huh? (Score:1, Funny)
Re:Google is not to be trusted (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Google is not to be trusted (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Great, Web *3.0* (Score:4, Funny)
A synergistic development model.
Grassroots support.
Enterprise level uptime and support (obviously).
This technology promises to create a paradigm shift in the way we think about web services.
Re:agreed with the worst case. (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Google is not to be trusted (Score:2, Funny)