LifeLock Spokesperson's Stolen ID Inspires Lawsuits 217
OrochimaruVoldemort writes "It seems as though LifeLock isn't as secure as Todd Davis makes it out. According to a LifeLock spokesman, his identity has been stolen. For two years, Davis has been daring hackers to steal his ID. Looks like he got what he wanted. CNN reports: 'Now, LifeLock customers in Maryland, New Jersey and West Virginia are suing Davis, claiming his service didn't work as promised and he knew it wouldn't, because the service had failed even him.'"
TWO FREAKING YEARS (Score:4, Insightful)
And that person got it from a payday check cashing place at that.
Not exactly a reputable type of business in general.
I'd say his service works pretty well based upon that track record.
Duh. Just Duh. (Score:3, Insightful)
"he knew it wouldn't"? (Score:5, Insightful)
Isn't the fact that he got his identity stolen due to use of the system more or less hard proof that he didn't know it wouldn't work?
Re:TWO FREAKING YEARS (Score:3, Insightful)
"Identify theft" needs a new name (Score:5, Insightful)
In other news ... (Score:3, Insightful)
Although you do have to be a bit of chump to pay $10 per month to lock your credit, the value is that the company will do all the work if your identity does get stolen. So unless the company is incompetent at that, I declare these people to be a bunch of whiners, with some ambulance chasing douchebag lawyer probably promising them great riches if they win.
Re:"he knew it wouldn't"? (Score:4, Insightful)
But he made commercials promising it would work AFTER it had failed.
Re:I figured that happened. (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:TWO FREAKING YEARS (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Great secuity (Score:4, Insightful)
Oops, I guess I was the 800 lb. elephant in the room.
Re:The news is... still somewhat of an old story.. (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:"Identify theft" needs a new name (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:ID is not stolen until... (Score:3, Insightful)
HA!!! Goes to show (Score:3, Insightful)
billionaires for tort reform! (Score:5, Insightful)
I understand where you are coming from, and I agree, but torts are way down on the list of court reform issues that need to be addressed. Federal, State, and local Attorney's offices are the worst offender here, with large companies being a close second. Our criminal justice system is basically a plea bargain system now, it's so gamed and rigged by the DA's that any notion of a person accused of a crime having a 'fair day in court' is reserved only for the very rich who can afford $50,000+ lawyers. The RIAA, MPAA with their frivolous lawsuits are just as bad.
The common thread here is that the courts have become another way to abuse everyday citizens in our country for political and financial gain, or even worse, for Public Relations.
To the lawsuits mentioned in this story, I think the litigants in this lawsuit deserve their day in court. Part of me is glad his identity was stolen. Anyone who knows about how identity theft works (even at a cursory level), knows that the services this guy was pedaling were complete vaporware. His company was taking advantage of a climate of fear and he inadvisably believed his own hype. Granted, courts do get it very wrong sometimes, and we always need to make sure we provide ways to rectify those situations, but I do not think this case is in that territory.
It is wrong to mislead people using their irrational fears and ignorance. Yes. It is wrong. Alot of people in our society seem to think that it's ok to do this...that's what I think needs reform!
Re:identity theft legal? (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:the nerve (Score:3, Insightful)
Great, and when you hire one of these so called "taxi services" and they show up with a rickshaw and you get there at walking speed, are you going to feel cheated? After all, they never guaranteed a specific speed, and they got you there at exactly the same time as if you'd walked yourself, but you saved the trouble of walking. That's worth an eternal fee, right?
Re:The news is... still somewhat of an old story.. (Score:4, Insightful)
So if a clerk fails to check ID or doesn't run the credit report, their service worked and it was a failure outside it. But supposedly, they contest it for you and all you have to do is tell them about it.
The CEO even claims the Texas incident is proof life lock works because the clerk failed to verify the guys identity and the service took care of everything for him. He wasn't out a dime more then the cost of the service and didn't waist any time with the incident.
Second, It says it stops you from being a "victim of identity theft". That could be interpreted in many ways. Is a victim someone who has had someone else attempt to use their personal information or is a victim someone who has had to pay fees and spend endless hours as well as being denied a loan for something else because someone used their personal information. It is sort of like if someone attacks you and punches you. You would/might be a victim unless you signed up for a cage match or knowingly stepped in a boxing ring as an opponent of someone skilled in that art. You would/might be a victim if you were minding your own business, you probably wouldn't be one if you punched the other guy first. So there is some interpretation going on here.
From the adds, I agree with you. But after reading their website lifelock.com , I'm not sure if that really is the case. I think it will be interesting to see what the courts determine.