US Court Orders Company to Use Negative Keywords - Slashdot

Slashdot

US Court Orders Company to Use Negative Keywords 177

Posted by ScuttleMonkey on Monday May 05, 2008 @01:11PM
from the negative-ghostrider-the-pattern-is-full dept.

A US court has ordered a firm to utilize negative adwords in their internet advertising. "Orion Bancorp took Orion Residential Finance (ORF) to court in Florida over ORF's use of the word 'Orion' in relation to financial services and products, arguing that it had used the term since 2002 and had held a trade mark for it since then. [...] The judge in the case went further, though, restraining ORF from 'purchasing or using any form of advertising including keywords or "adwords" in internet advertising containing any mark incorporating Plaintiff's Mark, or any confusingly similar mark, and shall, when purchasing internet advertising using keywords, adwords or the like, require the activation of the term "Orion" as negative keywords or negative adwords in any internet advertising purchased or used.'"

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

US Court Orders Company to Use Negative Keywords

Search 177 Comments Log In/Create an Account

Comments Filter:

Editors please Edit! (Score:4, Funny)

by alta (1263) writes: on Monday May 05, 2008 @01:15PM (#23302422) Homepage Journal

The judge in the case went further, though, restraining ORF from 'purchasing or using any form of advertising including keywords or 'adwords' in internet advertising containing any mark incorporating Plaintiff's Mark, or any confusingly similar mark, and shall, when purchasing internet advertising using keywords, adwords or the like, require the activation of the term 'Orion' as negative keywords or negative adwords in any internet advertising purchased or used.
Do you realize how long this sentence is? Fine for court documents, but not for a casual news site.

Share
twitter facebook linkedin
Re:Editors please Edit! (Score:5, Funny)

by travdaddy (527149) writes: <.travo. .at. .linuxmail.org.> on Monday May 05, 2008 @01:21PM (#23302508)

Do you realize how long this sentence is? Fine for court documents, but not for a casual news site.

It's fine, we're all very adept lawyers here.

Parent Share
twitter facebook linkedin
Misinterpreting negative (Score:5, Funny)

by Bovius (1243040) writes: on Monday May 05, 2008 @01:22PM (#23302514)

When I first read the post, for some reason I thought "negative keywords" meant they had to advertise under keywords that people wouldn't want, like "really bad financial service" or "shady loan company" or "housing lemons".

Share
twitter facebook linkedin
Re:Orion Bankcorp: Crybabies (Score:5, Funny)

by JustOK (667959) writes: on Monday May 05, 2008 @01:23PM (#23302530) Journal

Plus, everyone knows the Orion is a satire/parody website.

Parent Share
twitter facebook linkedin
My interpretations: (Score:5, Funny)

by Alzheimers (467217) writes: on Monday May 05, 2008 @01:23PM (#23302532)

1) Company must now register and pay for the keywords "Dummy", "Poopiehead", "Fartsniffer", and "Boogerbrains"

or

2) Company must now register keywords that, when combined with their intended keywords, nullify each other out, like Semantic anti-matter.

or

3) Company may only use keywords that have a value less than zero.

Share
twitter facebook linkedin
Re:Orion Bankcorp: Crybabies (Score:3, Funny)

by sm62704 (957197) writes: on Monday May 05, 2008 @01:24PM (#23302546) Journal

The bank one should change their name to "Orien's Moneybelt".

Parent Share
twitter facebook linkedin
Re:Editors please Edit! (Score:5, Funny)

by gbjbaanb (229885) writes: on Monday May 05, 2008 @01:28PM (#23302584)

ok. translation for the modern generation:

"you know dude, you been naughty. like stop it, k"

will that do ya?

Parent Share
twitter facebook linkedin
Re:My interpretations: (Score:4, Funny)

by Yvan256 (722131) writes: on Monday May 05, 2008 @01:31PM (#23302614) Homepage Journal

Company may only use keywords that have a value less than zero
Well, someone finally solved it:

1. Get sued for trademark infringement
2. Get court to force you to buy negative keywords (which value is less than zero)
3. Profits!

Parent Share
twitter facebook linkedin
Re:Editors please Edit! (Score:5, Funny)

by gnick (1211984) writes: on Monday May 05, 2008 @01:36PM (#23302652) Homepage

Do you realize how long this sentence is? Fine for court documents, but not for a casual news site.
Sometimes, due either to an attempt to communicate a complicated idea or the desire to expand on a simple idea ad nauseum for novelty purposes, a sentence will carry on for extended lines and, if properly authored by an individual using simple words and eschewing obfuscation, it will not necessarily be difficult for the general public to understand, even without the assistance of a lawyer, translator, or advanced Communications degree.

Parent Share
twitter facebook linkedin
But who is actually the Master of Orion? (Score:1, Funny)

by Anonymous Coward writes: on Monday May 05, 2008 @01:38PM (#23302680)

I think that the case should probably have been settled by whichever of the two originally defeated The Guardian. That's the only way I've ever known of to determine Orion ownership...

Share
twitter facebook linkedin
Re:Orion, that's definitely a unique name.... (Score:5, Funny)

by Anonymous Coward writes: on Monday May 05, 2008 @01:57PM (#23302924)

What do you expect with Perl crap from the early 90s, you think they've heard of unicode and character encoding?

Parent Share
twitter facebook linkedin
Re:Editors please Edit! (Score:5, Funny)

by Hatta (162192) writes: on Monday May 05, 2008 @01:59PM (#23302952) Journal

They're lucky that's the only long sentence given by the judge.

Parent Share
twitter facebook linkedin
Aye Matey, forget Orion, call yourself Booties (Score:4, Funny)

by Orion Blastar (457579) writes: <`moc.liamg' `ta' `ratsalbnoiro'> on Monday May 05, 2008 @02:00PM (#23302968) Homepage Journal

as in Pirate Booty or Booties plural.

Pirate Booties Bankcorp

You can hire Maddox to be your spokesperson.

Parent Share
twitter facebook linkedin
Re:Editors please Edit! (Score:1, Funny)

by Anonymous Coward writes: on Monday May 05, 2008 @02:02PM (#23303000)

Sometimes, thoughts are complex.

The again, sometimes sentences (such as the one quoted), are just poorly written.

Parent Share
twitter facebook linkedin
Re:Editors please Edit! (Score:4, Funny)

by Daffy Duck (17350) writes: on Monday May 05, 2008 @02:15PM (#23303172) Homepage

Also, not enough people think they're not smart or don't think that they aren't smart or are not smarter than they don't think.. wait, what was the question again?

Parent Share
twitter facebook linkedin
Re:The Wrong Cachet (Score:3, Funny)

by JasonKChapman (842766) writes: on Monday May 05, 2008 @02:17PM (#23303186) Homepage

I guess "Onion Residential Finance" would bring a tear.
Only in appeal.

Parent Share
twitter facebook linkedin
Re:Editors please Edit! (Score:3, Funny)

by Anonymous Coward writes: on Monday May 05, 2008 @02:18PM (#23303202)

Also, sometimes people dro letters, from the ends of words, and use, too many, commas.

Parent Share
twitter facebook linkedin
Re:Bad precedent (Score:1, Funny)

by Anonymous Coward writes: on Monday May 05, 2008 @02:20PM (#23303236)

your AAAA record for locksmiths.com in DNS is violating my trademark for "AAAA DNS Services". Only my company can do AAAA records in DNS.

Parent Share
twitter facebook linkedin
what? (Score:3, Funny)

by theshowmecanuck (703852) writes: on Monday May 05, 2008 @02:35PM (#23303438) Journal

IANAL

Parent Share
twitter facebook linkedin
Re:Editors please Edit! (Score:2, Funny)

by Anonymous Coward writes: on Monday May 05, 2008 @02:57PM (#23303698)

It scares me that I understood that.

I need a woman, NOW.

Parent Share
twitter facebook linkedin
Re:Orion Bankcorp: Crybabies (Score:3, Funny)

by DECS (891519) writes: on Monday May 05, 2008 @03:11PM (#23303804) Homepage Journal

It's in the title of a Prince song, so presumably it's a poetic reference to a vagina.

Parent Share
twitter facebook linkedin
Re:Editors please Edit! (Score:5, Funny)

by SingerGuy59 (1279730) writes: on Monday May 05, 2008 @03:23PM (#23303896)

The magnitude of your copious assertion is far to sagacious for my diminutive comprehension.

Parent Share
twitter facebook linkedin
Re:My interpretations: (Score:3, Funny)

by WK2 (1072560) writes: on Monday May 05, 2008 @04:03PM (#23304268) Homepage

Just because you buy something with value less than zero, doesn't mean that you get paid money for accepting it. Windows Vista, for example.

Parent Share
twitter facebook linkedin
Re:Editors please Edit! (Score:5, Funny)

by zippthorne (748122) writes: on Monday May 05, 2008 @05:09PM (#23304982) Journal

Legal rulings are like genie wishes (or is that the other way around...).

As soon as you hit the period, you get your wish. Usually corrupted in a horribly unforeseen way.

Parent Share
twitter facebook linkedin
Re:Editors please Edit! (Score:4, Funny)

by Just Some Guy (3352) writes: <kirk+slashdot@strauser.com> on Monday May 05, 2008 @05:46PM (#23305308) Homepage Journal

What?

Many words OK.

Parent Share
twitter facebook linkedin
Re:Editors please Edit! (Score:5, Funny)

by popmaker (570147) writes: on Monday May 05, 2008 @05:57PM (#23305426)

I need a woman, NOW.
Well, if you REALLY want something incomprehensible, fine, go ahead.

Parent Share
twitter facebook linkedin

There may be more comments in this discussion. Without JavaScript enabled, you might want to turn on Classic Discussion System in your preferences instead.

Related Links Top of the: day, week, month.

822 commentsAsk Slashdot: What Does Edward Snowden Deserve?
742 comments"Microsoft Killed My Pappy"
723 commentsAtlanta Gambled With Winter Storm and Lost
698 commentsBitcoin Exchange Flexcoin Wiped Out By Theft
664 commentsVirtual Boss Keeps Workers On a Short Leash

"I'm growing older, but not up." -- Jimmy Buffett