UK to Ban Possession of Certain 'Violent' Pornography 557
Backlash writes "Massive surveillance? Check. Building a DNA database? Check. Laws against thought crime? Not yet, but coming very soon. The UK government is soon to pass legislation that would criminalise possession of certain types of 'violent' pornography, even if it was part of a consensual session between two adults. Lord Wallace of Tankerness pointed out an ideological schism during last week's debate in the House of Lords: 'If no sexual offence is being committed it seems very odd indeed that there should be an offence for having an image of something which was not an offence. ... Having engaged in it consensually would not be a crime, but to have a photograph of it in one's possession would be a crime. That does not seem to make sense to me.'" Combine laws like this with widespread computer ownership, and it makes a whole lot of (Orwellian) sense.
We want them broken. (Score:5, Interesting)
Why? (Score:5, Interesting)
I'm wondering what other images will become illegal because they elicit violence...perhaps it will be illegal to draw a picture of Muhammad too? Just my 2 cents.
Hentai...? (Score:5, Interesting)
reality vs fantasy (Score:5, Interesting)
1 -- The usual way. Regular grown up people know that pornography is not real life and that many things that are fun to fantasize about would be unwise, unhygienic, fatal etc. in real life.
2 -- This crackdown on everything, and this massive effort to gather data and powers, come at a time when actual street crime is very high, white-collar crime has drastically undermined the UK's 'level playing field', and policies from tax to immigration seem to be selected without any hope of actually implementing them. In other words, the real fantasy here is the fantasy that the UK government can really control the things around it -- and I'm much afraid the government has confused that pleasant fantasy with reality, and that they will only pile on more regulations and powers as actual ability to influence events at ground level slips from their grasp.
Note that this is subtly different from the US situation. In the US, there's been a scramble for new data and powers, but I never have the feeling that the Executive branch has too *little* control...
Also, thank fuck for the House of Lords. There are few elected representatives who'll speak out on an issue that's got the word 'pornography' stuck to it.
Re:Consequence of globalization (Score:3, Interesting)
The people proposing this law are actual violent criminals, advocating violence against otherwise innocent people they just don't like. They are far, far more dangerous than the targets of this law. How about some legislation to keep nanny state dictators off the streets? We'd all be safer for it.
Re:and now for something completely different (Score:3, Interesting)
I love Jesus. (Score:5, Interesting)
Now that their banning this kind of imagery it looks like my Jesus wanking days are over.
You don't get it. (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Hentai...? (Score:3, Interesting)
You can read the whole bill here -- it's not long, and would be quite funny in parts if it wasn't so sad: http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200607/cmbills/130/07130.43-46.html#j400 [parliament.uk]"
But that doesn't mean film fans are out of trouble.
As you can see from the act itself, the really bizarre thing about this bill is that it may be legal to own an entire extreme film (such as Pasolini's "120 Days of Sodom"), because it's been passed the British Board of Film Classification. But it would be illegal to own a still from that film, if it was decided you owned that still "for the purpose of sexual arousal". And of course there are plenty of mainstream films showing sexy people in danger - what happens if you're caught with a still from one of those?
Absurd. And bad news for any of us Brits who thought the principle of "freedom of speech" meant anything in the UK.
A final weird irony about this bill banning various forms of visual image is that it was sponsored by David Blunkett, a politican who -- to his great credit -- became Home Secretary even though he is completely blind.