EU's Anti-Trust Investigation of OOXML Continues 111
I Don't Believe in Imaginary Property writes "Since January, the EU has been investigating whether Microsoft broke anti-trust laws while advocating OOXML. That investigation continues following its passage as a standard. Meanwhile, the ISO approval of OOXML is being appealed, so Microsoft hasn't won just yet."
I hope MS gets rebuffed harshly (Score:5, Insightful)
MS did this evil thing either because they do not care at all about anything except their short-term profits, or because they are scared out of their wits. In either case they need to be contained fast, before the world is without a credible (read: of high integrity and producing high quality syandards) standardization organisation.
Re:The new EU economic plan (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:I hope MS gets rebuffed harshly (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Appeal? (Score:5, Insightful)
European anti-competitive laws are mainly aimed at European countries/companies.
There are still strong protectionnist tendencies amongst european countries against each other.
For example, last week, the Italian state can't refund the nearly bankrupted Air Italia because of these laws. They are almost "forced" to sell it to Air France/KLM (privately held)
Anti-trust laws are also mainly aimed at European companies.
So basically the European union is the only body in Europe promoting/reinforcing free/fair trades. Its main mission is to guarantee fair play amongst its members. American companies having European acitivites experience it from time to time. Here on slashdot microsoft makes headlines.
I noticed few months ago that Novell (I think, anyway It was an American company with open source based services) won a mid sized European Commission contract against european companies. Adobe is well established in the European commissions and it is making a lot (really a lot) of money.
If you play fair, you are welcome. If you don't you get fines.That's quite simple really.
Re:Appeal? (Score:5, Insightful)
Norway, Germany, Poland Romania and many others are reporting irregularities and stacking in their committees. The memo from Comes v Microsoft [groklaw.net] [pdf warning] describes pretty excatly what happened in those meetings.
Considerable poltiical influence was brought to bear too. Bill Gates campaigned in Denmark, where he is a friend of the Prime Minister. Sarkozy himself intervened [noooxml.org] on Microsoft's behalf in France.
This topic has started to expose just how much influence Microsoft has with governments, and shows they're willing to meddle with national sovereignty.
It's not going to take too much to turn it into a cause celebre.
Re:Interesting quote from groklaw link (Score:2, Insightful)
Then companies can standardise on whatever suits their internal need bests, while still being able to interroperate with everyone else, and the tools everyone will have will be able to convert from one to the other while only losing features that are unique to their format.
I think this is the ideal world. Though thats a big "should". I don't think the world will go that way, especially not on microsoft's side, but it would be ideal.
Comment removed (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:I hope MS gets rebuffed harshly (Score:5, Insightful)
Notice how the mainstream press are reporting Microsoft's OOXML ISO approval, without mentioning the dirty tricks (illegal or not) that they used to get it "approved".
So for Government programs that state that documents MUST be based on an open standard, Microsoft have won, and for anyone who mentions ODF is also an ISO standard, they can say "Who cares? ISO is a disorganized and easily corrupted organization, nothing they rubber stamp means anything!".
It's not at all surprising that Microsoft went after this whole hog, handcuffing customers to MS Office is the source of their income and power. All else (windows monopoly, etc) follows.
Is this guy serious? (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:ISO is now irrelevant (Score:3, Insightful)
The characters on my computer screen, which I previously had encoded in ISO-8859-1 or ISO-10646, now correspond only randomly to the byte sequences they are represented as — how do you who reads this know it is what I have written? The various programming languages I work in no longer operate correctly (except for, ironically, C#); my computer and I cannot agree on the meaning of words or the syntax. I am sure I am using the same semantics and syntax this week as last, and the compilers show no indication of having changed, yet they fail.
No, the ISO no longer has any reputation. All these things and others besides have ceased to work because of it. One mistake — one inability to hold their own against the worst onslaught they have seen — and they are dead, and all they have done is for nought. Before the experiences this last week, I thought the rest of the world would not notice any problems and would force us geeks along with them. How wrong I was!
Re:Appeal? (Score:5, Insightful)
OOXML was really crap when it was first submitted and we all don't really know if that has changed much as the fixes haven't really been looked at in any detail. Hence why use a subpar format which is heavily based on Microsoft Office simply because Microsoft feels that it's a competition between Closed vs Open Source?
It's not a competition, this has nothing to do with Open Source, it's about a file format being implementable or not and about being realistic. The OOXML format ISO is never going to be used, even by Microsoft, that's just realistic expectation based on their past. What's going to happen is this... How Microsoft Office renders your exported files is going to determine the ISO format and thus nothing will actually be changed from today, where Microsoft gets to make the standard that everyone follows.
So, why is it such a bad thing to use ODF which isn't going to be heavily influenced like OOXML is by a single vendor? Although ODF was originally in Open Office implementations of ODF are so widespread in other office suites and Open Office's popularity is so small that there is no chance that Open Office could ever control the ODF spec like Microsoft could with OOXML.