In Soviet US, Comcast Watches YOU 404
cayenne8 sends us to Newteevee.com for a blog posting reporting from the Digital Living Room conference earlier this week. Gerard Kunkel, Comcast's senior VP of user experience, stated that the cable company is experimenting with different camera technologies built into its devices so it can know who's in your living room. Cameras in the set-top boxes, while apparently not using facial recognition software, can still somehow figure out who is in the room, and customize user preferences for cable (favorite channels, etc.). While this sounds 'handy,' it also sounds a bit like the TV sets in 1984. I am sure, of course, that Comcast wouldn't tap into this for any reason, nor let the authorities tap into this to watch inside your home in real time without a warrant or anything."
Interesting (Score:5, Interesting)
They can then go ahead and develop technology to determine who's watching the commercials and who isn't... and then apply a flat per-minute fee for not watching advertisements.
Alternatively, they can charge a per-viewer fee for pay-per-view events. After all, if you crap 20 people around your HDTV to watch a $40 boxing event, isn't it logical that you should pay extra for every extra person who's watching it?
Heck, there's all kinds of useful things a company could do with this information.
At last, per-person DRM (Score:5, Interesting)
The RIAA and the MPAA will love this. At last, content can be licensed to the individual, not the device. "Pay per viewer", at last.
And you can't cover the camera; if it can't see you to identify your biometrics, your licenses won't validate.
I don't like this (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:So that's what (Score:5, Interesting)
It would have been even better though if it acted as a tv tuner card that you could use to change channels on the box from the computer.
Re:Interesting (Score:2, Interesting)
The content companies already want you to have to buy a separate copy of a song or movie for every device that you want to play it on (iPod, TV, Car, computer); they would love even more to be able to charge a separate fee for every person who views/listens to their (not your) content too!
There's already a law in place that you can't show the superbowl on a screen 56" because they assume that many people must be watching on a screen that big, and they want to charge you beyond the millions in ad revenue. http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/02/02/2032250 [slashdot.org]
I would not be surprised if high-end TVs started having this "feature" first.
There is nothing in this for the "user experience" at all. That guy's title is more Orwellian than the subject of the article; "VP of user experience?!?"
Re:Ah well ... (Score:5, Interesting)
Many seem to be unaware that it was once illegal not to grow hemp in these here united states.
20 Minutes into the Future? (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Ah well ... (Score:5, Interesting)
I know this is going to come as a shock to you non-geezers, but you can watch TV without cable! There's satellite TV (several providers IINM) and good old trusty rabbit ears (my rabbit ears are amplified and deliver a very good picture) or roof antenna.
When I was a kid we only had three channels, and that was in the St Louis Metro area! I'm in dinky little Springfield IL now, and I can pick up nine channels.
Yeah, I could get dozens of channels with cable but so what? When I had cable I didn't watch very many anyway. If there's a program on cable I want to watch I'll go to a bar (I'm usually in one anyway). I used to like The Discovery Channel before they started sucking. Instead of "The Andromeda Galaxy: little known secrets" now there's "Painting race cars: little known secrets". They have ESPN on and there's... championship POKER??? Pool? WTF is next, twiddly winks?
At least when I was a kid there was Ernie Kovacs and Red Skelton. You young whippersnappers don't know what you're missing.
If they impliment this I'm going to have to make another article alomg the lines of Good Riddance to Bad Tech [kuro5hin.org] about bad tech we SHOULD get rid of... maybe add it to Dog-Slow Technologies [slashdot.org] and rename the sucker.
-mcgrew
Next reality show? (Score:3, Interesting)
Cameras on the Wii?? (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:They knew who I was. (Score:2, Interesting)
The interview coincided with the arrival of Fini, her party's leader and Italy's deputy prime minister, for his first official visit to Israel, during which he has said he intends to apologize to the Jewish people for Italy's Holocaust-era crimes.
Re:They knew who I was. (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Kunkel Replies (Score:3, Interesting)
I did respond to the post, too. I hope somebody reads it -- this company seriously needs a wakeup call,...
My response:
Thanks for clarifying that. Although, from reading the slashdot article on this subject today, it's clear to me that your PR department is apparently in overdrive doing "damage control" on this. While you are asserting that you have "no plans" to monitor people's living rooms, the fact remains that the technology and the capability are there to do so, and it only takes a few maligned individuals (like the same people that decided to throttle customers' bittorrent traffic into oblivion, or the guys that oppose net neutrality) to implement something scary like this. If corporations want consumers to trust them, you don't accomplish this trust through your PR department posting on people's blogs on the internet. You accomplish this trust by your actions as a corporation. Consumers don't want to be ripped off by corporations that charge over $100 for cable television service, and then raise their rates every three to four months without any noticeable upgrade in service. Nor do consumers want to be accused of being thieves of "intellectual property", and have trade groups like the RIAA & MPAA spy on us daily because they think we might be stealing music or movies or something. And we certainly don't want people that are already stealing our hard-earned money on outrageously priced cable TV service accusing us of being thieves ourselves!
If Comcast wants my business (no, I am not a current Comcast subscriber), they need to demonstrate to me with their actions that they have integrity, and offer services that I am interested in at reasonable rates. I would also recommend a major overhaul in your corporate management. Why not start with the CEO? Methinks you also have a few too many lawyers -- you could probably get rid of a couple,... But these are just suggestions.