Mayor of Florence Sues Wikipedia 196
ZioBit writes "Florence Mayor Leonardo Domenici and one of the city assessors
are suing (Google translation) Wikipedia on the basis of a (possible) defamation regarding the handling of public parkings assignation to a private company, "Florence Parking". The apparent problem is that both of their wives are members of the board of directors of "Florence Parking", and Wikipedia is reporting it."
Re:We slashdotted Google (Score:5, Informative)
Defense (Score:5, Informative)
An absolute defense against defamation is that the stated item is the truth. For their lawsuit to succeed, it has to be premised that something untrue was said that hurt them.
Re:Defense (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Defense (Score:2, Informative)
Re:So *who* are they actually suing? (Score:4, Informative)
"Wikipedia currently runs on dedicated clusters of GNU/Linux servers, 300 in Florida, 26 in Amsterdam and 23 in Yahoo!'s Korean hosting facility in Seoul."
P.S. Gotta love those network topology diagrams. Pretty dang nice for a nonprofit.
Re:Defense (Score:3, Informative)
the very source u cited contradicts you .. it says:
... and if u think about it a bit more, you may also find that truth and legal-truth are quite different things.
" Some U.S. statutes preserve historical common law exceptions to the defense of truth to libel actions. These exceptions were for statements "tending to blacken the memory of one who is dead" or "expose the natural defects of one who is alive." "
so no, the truth itself is not always a fool-proof legal defense in America
Sue whom exactly. (Score:5, Informative)
The Wikipedia Foundation is a US corporation, which does not hold assets in Italy, so it can't be sued in an Italian court. Or, to be more accurate, it can be sued but the verdict would be meaningless.
However, Wikipedia does have an Italian chapter ( http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Local_chapters [wikimediafoundation.org] ). I assume that is the organization being sued.
Re:Defense (Score:3, Informative)
Sounds like the real beef is these guys were convicted but wikipedia isn't report that one of them is appealing the conviction.
Re:Defense (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Added in about 20 mins time: (Score:5, Informative)
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Leonardo_Domenici&diff=195140090&oldid=195132037 [wikipedia.org]
Re:Sue whom exactly. (Score:2, Informative)
If you do business in Italy, you can be sued there. In fact, the determining factor on whether or not you can be sued in Italy is whether or not an Italian court says you can.
Non-robotic translation (Score:5, Informative)
FIRENZE- Firenze's Mayor, Leonardo DOmenici, and local government member Graziano Cioni have given the order to sue for defamation the Wikipedia web encyclopedia (sic).
THE ACCUSATION - The reason, explained in a brief communication, is because in the "Leonardo Domenici" page on the site there are references to decisions made by the Mayor and his staff that, quoting, ''caused criticism from the citizens'', quoting in particular the award of a contract related to the management of the town's parking lots to the "Firenze Parking" company, of which Dominici and Cioni's wives have seats in the board of directors.
THE INQUIRY - The communication from the Mayor reminds that such a "defamation" had circulated in the past and that in 2004 the office of the public prosecutor had started an investigation, resulting in one indictment and a request for a trial. The Wikipedia page, however (at the time of writing) has not been modified and is still now present in the form challenged by Domenici. Hence the decision to sue for defamation and libel.
Re:public parkings assignation (Score:1, Informative)
I think that "grant" would be a more accurate translation.
Re:Defense (Score:-1, Informative)
Re:Added in about 20 mins time: (Score:1, Informative)
Re:This is actually kinda frightening... (Score:3, Informative)
Assuming that your local police are really stupid and/or bought off...
China would be footing your legal bill (18 USC 3195) but even the average public defender could argue that successfully:
The concept of nationalism is based on the idea that your country will protect you. It's kind of lost on a lot of Americans since it's been quite a while since we've gone toe-to-toe with a foreign army on our own soil. But if such a thing happened, I would expect a lot of diplomatic saber-rattling, perhaps an embargo of the country that extradited you (likely ruining their tourism economy), and if that fails, a military response. With such a flowchart on most leaders' minds, they will generally refuse extraditions for political reasons.
Re:Florence. where ? (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Added in about 20 mins time: (Score:2, Informative)