Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Government News Hardware

UK Commissioner Seeks To Ban Ultrasonic Anti-Teen Device 552

mikesd81 points out a Times Online article that discusses the legality of the Mosquito sound device, which is used to annoy and drive off younger people with sounds that are too high-pitched for most adults to hear. We discussed how annoying this device can be a couple years ago. From Times Online: "Sir Albert Aynsley-Green, the Children's Commissioner for England appointed to represent the views of the country's 11 million children, has set up a campaign — called Buzz Off — that is calling for the Mosquito to be banned on grounds that it infringes the rights of young people. 'These devices are indiscriminate and target all children and young people, including babies, regardless of whether they are behaving or misbehaving,' Sir Al told the BBC. 'The use of measures such as these are simply demonizing children and young people, creating a dangerous and widening divide between the young and the old.'"
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

UK Commissioner Seeks To Ban Ultrasonic Anti-Teen Device

Comments Filter:
  • The cost (Score:3, Interesting)

    by Harmonious Botch ( 921977 ) * on Friday February 15, 2008 @03:28AM (#22431416) Homepage Journal
    It lists at 500 pounds. That is over 1000 US dollars. Why is it so expensive? It's just a waveform generator, an amp, and a speaker, right?
  • The file is bad (Score:4, Interesting)

    by Stormwatch ( 703920 ) <rodrigogirao@POL ... om minus painter> on Friday February 15, 2008 @03:35AM (#22431476) Homepage
    If you tried the mosquito samples [freemosquitoringtone.org] and simply couldn't hear the last, highest frequency one -- the problem is not your hearing. I opened it with an audio editor to be sure, and the waveform is a flat line. There is NO SOUND in that file.
  • Better test: (Score:3, Interesting)

    by MsGeek ( 162936 ) on Friday February 15, 2008 @03:44AM (#22431534) Homepage Journal
    Use Audacity [sourceforge.net], a free/open source program. Available for Mac OS X, Windows, and the platform it originated on, Linux. Ask it to generate a 25,000Hz sine-wave tone for 10 seconds. Then take a listen to the results. Can you hear the tone? I can.
  • Suddenly, (Score:2, Interesting)

    by robo_mojo ( 997193 ) on Friday February 15, 2008 @04:13AM (#22431664)
    earplugs.
  • Re:Heh. (Score:5, Interesting)

    by MrKaos ( 858439 ) on Friday February 15, 2008 @04:51AM (#22431868) Journal

    Yes, but I tried the same thing with Audacity's tone generator after remembering that small fact about mp3. No crunching there. Guess what? I still heard the tone.
    From memory the highest frequency your sound card can generate is half the clock rate of the oscillator on your sound card, if you have a 96Khz rate card then you can probably generate frequencies up to about 48khz, if the oscillator is 44.1Khz then max of about 22.5khz. Of course that's the advertised rate, could be higher or lower slightly.

    I guess I just have damn good ears, or all the loud amplified music I listened to in my youth didn't kill the high end of my hearing.
    I found the same thing, though tintinitis can still affect you even if your hearing is good, well that's the way it seems with me sometimes, just be careful I love loud music too but that ringing sucks big time when it kicks in. I had a hearing check and my sensitivity was really good after many loud concerts, jams with bands, night clubs etc - I feel very lucky - I use hearing protection ALL the time now.

    And one thing I did find useful, generating a high-pitched noise above human hearing (I've got a delta-1010lt connected to a PA system, it's oscillator is 50Khz) was to get my neighbors dog's to STFU. I certainly wasn't keen on disturbing the rest of my neighbors by yelling at the dogs at 1,2,3,5,6,7am. Worked a treat - even for the dogs in the next street along - and no-one was the wiser - thus avoiding unnecessary confrontation. It's amazing what can be done with a few heavy duty tweeters, an amp, and a distorting high-frequency signal source (ardour and ladspa in this case).

    Beside I know heeps of kids that have high frequency ring tones so that their teachers cannot hear their mobiles ringing in class, cheeky little brats. Might be agood idea under some circumstances IF used with restraint and wisdom - not just to be obnoxious. I only used enough high frequency noise on the dogs so they would learn to keep quiet.

  • Re:Wow (Score:1, Interesting)

    by Kashgarinn ( 1036758 ) on Friday February 15, 2008 @05:40AM (#22432114)
    ..reading your post you'd think kids trying to find something to do, doing stuff together is a bad thing.

    Instead of grabbing the beating stick to any problem, or legislation, why not try to understand what the problem is.

    Have you actually gone up to the kids and asked them why they're there playing instead of somewhere else? Have you tried to understand what's happening from their side?

    Kids aren't stupid, or evil, or trying to make your life miserable. If they show no respect, have an attitude towards you, then that's your fault and your inability as well as other adults in the neighbourhood to deal properly with the situation.

    So grow up and deal properly with the problem instead of shouting "get off my lawn!"

    K.
  • Re:Wow (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Builder ( 103701 ) on Friday February 15, 2008 @05:51AM (#22432158)
    I have no objection to kids playing anywhere they like.

    But how do you justify the broken windows and the chronic litter?

    I live in a neighborhood with similar issues, and I'll be DAMNED if I will try to understand what is happening from their side. There is NO acceptable reason for trashing a bus shelter or a DLR shelter. There is NO good reason to dump rubbish bins in the street. There is NO acceptable reason for urinating on the stairs to the train platforms.

    When they decide to become part of society, I'll treat them like they deserve to be. While they're playing at Lord of the Flies, I'll treat them like the animals they are.
  • Community break-down (Score:1, Interesting)

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday February 15, 2008 @06:35AM (#22432352)
    You know, have you thought about one thing: Does these kids have a place do go?

    Where excactly are they supposed to be? Mesmerized in front of a TV? Playing violent computer games? What life are they being offered?

    This sounds exactly like failure of teenage clubhouses and free/sports areas in your neighbourhood. Any zone they mightve used, is probably linked to fees which these kids have no way to pay. The rest is occupied by neighbourhood and commercial sites.

    Do any of the people in your neighbourhood speak to eachother? Like, you are pretty many people, and can deal with most _any_ problem in your neighbourhood if you want to. But if nothings happening, this is a symptom nobody is dealing with it. YOU dont have to go in front of the teens, weve given braincells to think with, you just have to gather people and agree on some things..

    This is a classic failure of community in your area, and the kids are just the symptom of the real problem. Yes, theyre asses, but its because theyre forced to live in a shit community that really doesnt care.

    There is possibility of doing wonderful things there.. for those with their eyes open.
  • Re:Wow (Score:5, Interesting)

    by AIFEX ( 1036394 ) on Friday February 15, 2008 @06:44AM (#22432390)
    Furthermore, in support of your argument, the UK news is consistently riddled with stories where adults who have approached such groups have been kicked to shit, or more recently to death.

    No one has a problem with constructive activities or even people hanging out, but that's not what they do anymore, because people don't stop them, give an inch and they take a mile. Smashed cars, smashed windows, stabbings, gang wars, old women/men being battered to death, the list goes on.
  • Re:Wow (Score:5, Interesting)

    by gmack ( 197796 ) <gmack@noSpAM.innerfire.net> on Friday February 15, 2008 @08:26AM (#22432882) Homepage Journal
    Except that kids aren't the only one who can hear those things. I'm 30 and I can still hear outside the "adult range". You had better believe I will be avoiding spending my income at any store that annoys me.

    On a more amusing note here in Montreal they use classical music for the same purpose. Stores that don't want kids around will play it outside their shops. Pissed me off the first time heard something good and went inside to get a better listen only to discover that inside they were playing some crap radio station.
  • Re:Wow (Score:3, Interesting)

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday February 15, 2008 @09:02AM (#22433114)
    As a parent of a 16 year old I can tell you what is wrong.

    1 - parents of other kids are morons. They dont teach them right from wrong or any respect for themselves or others.

    2 - right now out of control is "cool" the more out of control the "cooler" you are. Destruction of someone elses things, theft and shoplifting are considered the coolest of them all.

    3 - Kids teach other kids destructive things. No kid would pick up a cigarette and start smoking if it was not for their idiot friends forcing it on them. No kid would cut themselves if it was not for their idiot friends guilting them into it or convincing them to do it. Same for the good kids getting into destruction and mayhem. It's the other stupid brats sucking the kids into it.

    I solved a vandalisim problem on my property, when the cops arrived and had the kids in hand, I talked with the cop and then with the kids. I said, "I have a pump shotgun. I talked to the officer on this and he said I am legally allowed to do this. Next time I hear noises in my garage or home, I will not stop and tell you to leave, I will fire a couple of rounds into your chest. you will probably die a very slow and painful death." the officer backed me up telling them that they were home invading and I have the right to kill them. The kids shit themselves right there. One started crying. I have had no problems for 2 years now.

    My global solution? return of corporal punishment. Kids and Young adults today know there are no repercussions to their actions. what's the worst that will happen? Mom or Dad will have to pay for me smashing out all the windows on that car? who cares, all I'll get is grounded from the TV for 3 months and I'll sneak out at night anyways.

    Beat the brats ass and they will not only get the point but realize there is something bad that will happen to them if they do it. Also cince most parents wont do it, the state gets to do it. Help support caning of the 12-18 age group, because the worthless parents refuse to punish the kids for doing something wrong.

  • by h4rm0ny ( 722443 ) on Friday February 15, 2008 @10:05AM (#22433768) Journal

    You're absolutely right about mothers with babies. Imagine trying and trying to quieten a crying baby, all the time unaware that it's being targetted by a device you don't know is there.
  • by RiotingPacifist ( 1228016 ) on Friday February 15, 2008 @10:11AM (#22433838)

    These devices are only used to disperse gangs which have already accumulated and who are causing trouble.
    that's complete rubbish, these devices are used indiscriminately, i have to put up with 1 near my town hall where, the kids do not cause trouble.

    They are not emitting this sound on a constant basis, and are just fired for very short periods of time as required.
    they do emit for short periods of time but not as required they emit for about 20mins whenever somebody moves, then thiers a 5-10 minute wait before it kicks in again, this is not as required.

    As many others have said, the UK has a very serious problem with gangs of youths causing trouble, and we're not just talking a little petty crime, there have been a number of recent cases where individuals, often adults, have actually being kicked to death or stabbed by such groups.
    The deaths are not in public places and out side shops where these are being used so that is completly of topic. In fact if the gang had been outside a shop instead of the mans home, people would have seen the attack. Your argment is based on the fact that we have a problem with some youths (its not at all serious compaired to US), so we should punish them all. And about half a dozen times isnt often!

    When people talk about the rights of children, they always think of the relatively innocent ones, the ones who are probably more like we were when we were young (and this is an image that those who are anti-Mosquito are trying to foster) but the truth of the matter is that the kids this device is being used on, have little in common with the British kids of the 80s.
    Defending an idea because some people deserve it is like saying because some adults are terrorists we should all be watched, it is in fact you that's attacking the liberties of the innocent! the kids of the 80s, wernt the kids of the 80s the punks that would hang around in gangs and start fights, just because you didnt go round causing trouble doesn't mean your generation is innocent!

    I think the problem ultimately lies in society itself, as the rich/poor divide gets wider kids on the lower end have less and less hope. While hope cant be forced on people, something has to be done about hope! Attacking them with devices like this and stop and search just reinforces the divide. The lib-dem candidate for london mayor said "we need effective policing" (he was a police oficer for 31 years so waether or not hed be a good mayor he does know exactly what hes talking about (btw he was policing the brixton riots in 81)) not blanket police suppression, thats failed in the past and is going to fail now too.

    btw im 20 and live in hoxton london, which isnt a 'safe' area but these things couldnt be further from the solution.
  • Re:Wow (Score:0, Interesting)

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday February 15, 2008 @11:29AM (#22434678)
    Even though the press whips up lots of concerned outrage about people being attacked by gangs of youths, I'm pretty sure that the number of occurrences is vanishingly small (20). Surely, you are far more likely to be battered by an abusive partner or hit by a motor vehicle, but no-one is trying to ban partners or cars.
  • by cayenne8 ( 626475 ) on Friday February 15, 2008 @11:47AM (#22434876) Homepage Journal
    "This suggests that you've been taught worthless "history indoctrination" whereby the current generation of middle-aged people portrays the time of their youth as perfect and ideal while the current state of affairs is headed toward Armageddon."

    Hardly. When I was growing up, these kinds of people wigging out and shooting up places was VERY rare. I was very young when the sniper at U of TX happened....that was HUGE news. I think there was someone that drove a car into a Luby's cafeteria, and started killing some people, but, those types of incidents were few and far between.

    When I was in school...and there was a fight, 99.9% of the time everyone survived because only fists were used...on the RARE occasion, there was a knife pulled, at least in my experience. You rarely heard of a weapon being brought to school, much less being used. And it isn't like we had less guns or access to guns back then.

    This situation of mass school shootings...is a very recent trend. Something has changed. Where I grew up, you didn't have gangs running all around. YOu didn't have to worry about teens carrying guns around, and not being afraid to use them.

    No, I'm not looking at my youth through rose colored 20/20 glasses. We had our problems, but, the extreme violence you are seeing throughout the country, was not around back then. You pretty much only heard about gangs and the like in large cities like NY or LA...but, rarely other places in the country.

    And we had just as many poor people back then....

    No, something has changed. Somewhere along the line....the basic belief in the value of a human life has been somehow lost.

  • Re:Heh. (Score:0, Interesting)

    by UbuntuDupe ( 970646 ) on Friday February 15, 2008 @12:44PM (#22435636) Journal
    I've been thinking about getting my hearing range evaluated. I seem to hear not just high sounds (like my CRT TV when the sound is off) but also very low ones, which are really annoying. I get weird looks from people when I claim to hear sounds that they don't. Anecdote: one morning I woke up and heard this far off buzzing, so I got up, left my apartment complex, walked down the street, and found a new compressor running to fill a truck's tires. Go fig.

    But I can't use my computer for a test (sound card probably won't permit the range) and I can't use local audiologists because they'll probably BSOD when asked to test someone who has *good* hearing. (Uh, now, what's the problem with your hearing now, can't uh, hear too much, eh? Uh, well, now we only done test people with them thur hearing problems.)

    Btw, anyone got some device to take care of thugs blaring subwoofers in traffic? Now *those* should be illegal. I don't object to your musical taste, but please, don't involuntarily subject my walls to it.
  • Re:Wow (Score:2, Interesting)

    by guywcole ( 984149 ) on Friday February 15, 2008 @01:04PM (#22435942) Homepage Journal
    Because, of course, indiscriminately harassing an entire population for the actions of a few members is an appropriate response.

    The logical response by these rebellious youth, then, should be treat all older people the exact same as those who treat them shittily. After all, why should they be bothered to actually address the pain-in-the-ass old people when they could just urinate on their steps of all the old people?

    Yes, class warfare, that's how we can solve these problems.

If all else fails, lower your standards.

Working...