RIAA Drops Case, Should Have Sued Someone Else 195
NewYorkCountryLawyer writes "Once again the RIAA has dropped a case with prejudice, this time after concluding
it was the defendant's daughter it should have sued
in the first place. In the case of Lava v. Amurao, mindful that in similar scenarios it has been held liable for the
defendant's attorney fees (Capitol v. Foster and Atlantic v. Andersen), the RIAA went on the offensive. In this case there was actually no attorney fee motion pending, making their motion all the more intriguing. The organization argued that it was the defendant's
fault that the record companies sued the wrong person, because the defendant didn't tell them that his daughter was the file sharer they were looking for."
does the jedi mind trick work on the RIAA (Score:5, Funny)
Maybe they'll go away? (Score:4, Funny)
Re:*yawn* (Score:5, Funny)
Sue my daughter... (Score:3, Funny)
(yes, why didn't the defendant say that?)
Re:Stupid RIAA (Score:5, Funny)
I agree. I'm pirating as fast as I can!
Re:I'm not obligated to help you (Score:5, Funny)
Dude, thanks for covering for me
Re:does the jedi mind trick work on the RIAA (Score:5, Funny)
I'll leave the determination of the answer to the parent poster's question as an exercise for the reader.
Re:Stupid RIAA (Score:4, Funny)
Face the grim reality of propably never having grandchildren ?-) Seriously, only on Slashdot...
Re:does the jedi mind trick work on the RIAA (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Stupid RIAA-Stupid ISP (Score:5, Funny)
Then you're probably not on Comcast.