Microsoft Threatens Startups Over Account Info 156
HangingChad writes "According to Fortune, there are reports that Microsoft is trying to strong arm startups to give preferential treatment to MSN Messenger and are using account information as leverage. 'If the company wants to offer other IM services (from Yahoo, Google or AOL, say), Messenger must get top billing. And if the startup wants to offer any other IM service, it must pay Microsoft 25 cents a user per year for a site license.' Of course, if the company is willing to use Messenger exclusively 'fee will be discounted 100 percent.' Getting detailed information is difficult as many of the companies being approached are afraid of reprisals."
They are all playing the lock in game (Score:5, Interesting)
Open Identity systems such as OpenID are the way to go. But how do we break open the proprietary lock? Tim Berners-Lee told me to look at FOAF but we still need to complete the integration into the authentication systems.
Heavy Foot (Score:5, Interesting)
Drop Microsoft! Just drop them. Stop using them. They are old anyway. Let's come up with something NEW!
Backfires inc!
Re:They are all playing the lock in game (Score:5, Interesting)
You can export your links to other people in these schemes but the inbound links point in the same place, you can take your data but not your network.
One step forward here is that Google blogger has at last allowed people to use their own domain name with their blog. So you can move your blog to a different host if you please.
So, the real question (Score:5, Interesting)
What amazes me, is that MS does not buy companies who are on their platform. They just strongarm them and steal as be needed. Instead, they buy companies who could represent a threat to their platform or are making money hand over fist (the 2 tend to go hand in hand). So, by being in Windows, a startup not only pays much higher costs, but they also kill off a huge chunk of the market that would otherwise drive up their price, and then subject themselves to MS's hand.
Re:They are all playing the lock in game (Score:1, Interesting)
Microsoft should be afraid of legal repercussions for using this tactic...
They're not, this indicates part of the problem with the punishment they've had so far(too light).
Re:They are all playing the lock in game (Score:3, Interesting)
So, not to defend the actions or strategies of MS, but the aspect you've focused on is at least open for discussion.
Plz mod parent up (Score:1, Interesting)
Msft scams include: outright lying to the US-DoJ in video taped testimony, letters from dead people campaign, the scox scam, the acacia scam, outright stealing stacker technology, fake benchmarks, use of shill "journalists" like Enderle, fake "independent" benchmarks, fake "independent" reviews, and on and on.
Msft == corruption, like no other company.
Re:Evil is Microsoft's most important product? (Score:2, Interesting)
Could someone please explain? (Score:3, Interesting)
For those of us who don't use any of these services, could someone please clarify what is at issue. As I understand it, the problem is that people who have a contact list on a Microsoft service want to be able to use that contact list for some other company's service. Can't they just save their contacts in a file that the other services can import? Surely Microsoft has no claim to the data itself and therefore no way to interfere with importing such a file. It sounds like the other services are trying to connect to the Microsoft service and that that is what gives Microsoft something to say about it. Why do they need to do this?
The Practical Limits of Information Technology (Score:2, Interesting)
The web needs rethought if we really want to use it as a vehicle for efficient and unimpeded information transaction.
Re:What about Intellectual Property? (Score:3, Interesting)
Interesting...
Re:Not really... (Score:3, Interesting)