ID Tech May Mean an End to Anonymous Drinking 514
Anonymous Howard writes "If you visit a lot of bars and restaurants, you've likely crossed paths with driver's license scanners — machines that supposedly verify that your license is valid. In actuality, many of these scanners are designed to record your license information in addition to verifying them, and those that authenticate against a remote database are creating a record of when and where you buy alcohol. Not only that, but they're not even particularly effective — the bar code on your license uses an open, documented standard and can be rewritten to change your age or picture. Collecting our driver's license information is one thing, but collecting data about our personal drinking habits is not only a violation of, according to the ACLU representative quoted in the article, privacy and civil liberties, but this 'drinking record' could also create problems for people in civil and criminal lawsuits as proof of alcohol purchases in DUI cases or evidence of alcoholism in divorce lawsuits."
And impact employment and insurance? (Score:4, Insightful)
Additionally, insurance companies could drop you if they found out, for exaple, you were out drinking 3 nights a week.
If this info gets out it could have a huge impact on people.
Re:Huh? (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:rights vs records vs privacy (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Huh? (Score:5, Insightful)
A good majority of websites also do that, and who knows what they are doing with the data?
Really? Web sites track my behavior and correlate it with my name, address, date of birth, and (last I checked in some states) my social security number?
Doesn't sound too kosher to me.
DUI? (Score:4, Insightful)
The evidence of an alcohol purchase isn't going to be remotely sufficient to convict without a BAC test, and the presence of a BAC test alone should be more than sufficient to produce a conviction. I honestly don't see where the purhcahse record could hypothetically fit into the equation.
If there's an argument for or against ID scanning, this isn't it. Even from the cops' perspective, this isn't even going to help them 'nab the bad guys' any more than they're already equipped to do.
Papers, please?
Re:That's why (Score:2, Insightful)
Isn't this somewhat overblown? (Score:2, Insightful)
2) I find it really dubious that employers would ever get access to this sort of information and I think that it is unlikely that they would be allowed to use it without being sued.
While the potential exists for all sorts of "big brother" type applications, I find most of these scenarios to be somewhat far-fetched.
May as well not go out (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:rights vs records vs privacy (Score:5, Insightful)
Lots of information has the potential to be useful. That's not enough, by itself, to invalidate the very serious privacy concerns.
Anytime you start collecting information in advance, "just in case," you're fundamentally doing something wrong. You're treating innocent, honest people like criminals in order to make life marginally easier for the cops. If that's what people in law enforcement say they need to succeed, then we need to fire them and get some more innovative law enforcement, and give them better resources -- not twist our society around backwards in order to make their jobs easier.
Re:Target for Some Civil Disobedience (Score:4, Insightful)
I don't follow your logic: not only do you not get your Manhattan, you get your ass tossed in jail for as long as it takes them to figure out that you really do have a valid ID. And they're liable to charge you for tampering anyway.
Yeah, that's really sticking it to Dick Cheney! Fight The Power!
Re:Target for Some Civil Disobedience (Score:1, Insightful)
Re:rights vs records vs privacy (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Target for Some Civil Disobedience (Score:2, Insightful)
I have some tea to sell you. It's at the bottom of Boston Harbor.
Re:And impact employment and insurance? (Score:2, Insightful)
I'm sure that humans would have discovered accidentally that sweet liquids contaminated with yeast produced alcoholic liquids far sooner than we had an understanding of what "alcohol" actually was. Well before we had language, much less than organized religion.
However I'm willing to admit that I'm speculating, as my post has a little in terms of references as yours...
Re:rights vs records vs privacy (Score:4, Insightful)
Whoawhoawhoa there. Divorce hearings? You think it's a good idea for your entire drinking history to be brought up in a divorce hearing? That sounds to me like the most abusive application possible for this data.
Comment removed (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Target for Some Civil Disobedience (Score:5, Insightful)
Civil disobedience is nonviolent refusal to comply with a law or command of government, either because the law or command itself is perceived as unjust or because or because the government issuing the law or command is viewed as illegitimate independent of the merit of the particular law or command.
So "That is not civil disobedience; its's breaking the law" reveals a deep misunderstanding of the entire concept of civil disobedience. That's not saying one could not argue that the form of disobedience suggested is a poorly chosen and/or ineffective method of civil disobedience.
Re:And impact employment and insurance? (Score:5, Insightful)
Yeah, man, I hate when they accurately judge my risk of an accident and prevent me from leeching off of safe drivers.[1]
[1] Assuming frequent drinkers really are more dangerous as per actuarial tables, which may or may not be true.
Re:Target for Some Civil Disobedience (Score:5, Insightful)
Lakeville Liquors just built a new facility less than a half mile from my house. I walk by it daily and am proud that it joins the ranks of Starbucks as an establishment that I will never step foot in.
In addition, I have used a high powered earth magnet on my ID's magnetic stripe rendering it useless in any scanner including the cops (who asked me to get a new ID because it was "worn out"), the smoke shop (for cigars), or anywhere else that feels the need to scan ID.
If enough people realized what those machines did (I make sure to tell everyone around me when I see one being used before walking out) then businesses would stop using them because less people would enter the store. Sadly I'm dreaming about that because no one cares.
Re:Huh? (Score:1, Insightful)
It would be very easy for the government to subpoena the records of all the major chain stores and very quickly have a list of people who broke this law. They could even write it into the law that it's retroactive to some date. Or how about people who also have netflix accounts and own a DVD writer and have purchased DVD-R media in the last year... Even if it's not a technical "crime" they could probably sue you in civil court with a "Pay us 5k and we'll go away" shake down game.
Re:And impact employment and insurance? (Score:3, Insightful)
Less drunks around, less accidents, less deaths. Yes, banning alcohol is an idea whose time has finally come.
Re:And impact employment and insurance? (Score:5, Insightful)
Law enforcement is not supposed to be easy. One description I have heard of fascism is when the desire for efficiency of law enforcement outweighs any concern about civil rights. Judges (or whomever) may set a nearly-unenforcable condition for a probation if they choose to do so -- that is not my problem. It certainly does not give them or anyone else the right to invade my privacy for the sake of making their job easier.
Also, this will do nothing or next to nothing to stop drunk drivers. So this database can confirm that someone was at a bar and had an alcoholic beverage. It will not confirm whether they drove to the bar, walked to the bar, took a cab, or had a designated driver. So if a crime is committed, this will tell you even less than what could be learned by old-fashioned policework, i.e. interviewing witnesses.
I wish there were just one politician with the balls to be honest and say "yeah, I could say that this is for your safety or to help make the world a better place, but really we just want to invade your privacy so that we can have a society increasingly under central control." They are too cowardly to be so honest and it's fitting that they are elected by people too cowardly to value freedom more than security.
Re:Target for Some Civil Disobedience (Score:4, Insightful)
Just what do you think civil disobedience is, then? Writing a strongly worded letter to your senator?
The most effective way of avoiding a "tyranny of the majority" situation is to make it clear that enforcing an unjust law will be more trouble than not having it in the first place.
Re:Target for Some Civil Disobedience (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Not dictate your actions, just not associate wi (Score:5, Insightful)
If someone doesn't smoke at work, doesn't preach at people, does their job, shows up on time, acts professional, etc, it should be none of the employer's business.
Re:And impact employment and insurance? (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:God dammit (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:And impact employment and insurance? (Score:4, Insightful)
2) What the fuck are you talking about? If I'm an alcoholic, my company doesn't have any responsibility to pay for my treatment, except as it regards medical costs (see point one).
As for the final toss of line, "Those of us who have nothing to hide, have nothing to worry about", fuck you.
I've also got nothing to hide, and I still don't want my boss poking around in my private life. If you're ok with it, fine; don't foist your willingness to drop your pants for your boss on the rest of us. It's assholes like you that enable totalitarian governments.
Re:Thank MADD and those like them (Score:3, Insightful)
I really wish we could find a way to disband them or at least minimize their pull with State and Federal governments. They makeup stats by including calling it a drunk driving accident if a designated sober driver is driving his/her drunk friends home. Same goes for if you hit a drunk pedestrian. And if you look at the real stats they state that lowering the BAC below
Re:What could possibly fix this?!? (Score:3, Insightful)
If they scan your ID, they know you were THERE.
If you buy liquor with CASH, the only way they can prove you drank (or bought booze, actually) is to ask eyewitnesses.
If you buy liquor with electronic means, then they can easily say "Hey, you were here, AND you bought booze" by querying databases. You suddenly become the result of a SQL query, effectively. A credit card purchase record would most likely give the SAME information, though, couldn't it?
Re:And impact employment and insurance? (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:And impact employment and insurance? (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Frosty Piss, now checking for ID (Score:1, Insightful)
Re:And impact employment and insurance? (Score:3, Insightful)