Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Government Space News

British Village Requests Removal From GPS Maps 539

longacre writes "The tiny village of Barrow Gurney, England, has asked GPS map publisher Tele Atlas to remove them from the company's maps. The reason: truck drivers using GPS navigation devices are being directed to drive through the town despite the roads being too narrow for sidewalks, which has led to numerous accidents. At the root of the problem lies the fact that the navigation maps used by trucks are the same as those used by passenger cars, and they don't contain data on road width or no-truck zones. Tele Atlas says they will release truck-appropriate databases at some point, but until then they advise local governments to make use of a technology dating back to the Romans: road signs."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

British Village Requests Removal From GPS Maps

Comments Filter:
  • Re:Road Signs? (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday December 04, 2007 @09:38PM (#21580323)
    Put up road signs. Next, enforce the laws with lengthy traffic stops for trucks and strict fines. If one causes an accident anyway, feel free to throw them in jail pending local laws and the installation of signs detailing the laws.
  • Re:Road Signs? (Score:2, Interesting)

    by Neanderthal Ninny ( 1153369 ) on Tuesday December 04, 2007 @09:47PM (#21580381)
    I think in jolly ole England those Maximum Clearance" sign are marked "Max. Headroom". How many times have truck drivers, in England they are called lorry drivers, ignore all of those signs. Here are some image of what happens if someone ignores those signs: http://www.dhsdiecast.com/content/gallery/index.cfm?gallery_photo_id=3770 [dhsdiecast.com] http://www.dhsdiecast.com/content/gallery/index.cfm?gallery_photo_id=228 [dhsdiecast.com] There are many others you can search the internet for. I know there are many other villages in Europe that are in the similar condition in which the roads are too narrow for anything except a Morris Mini or smaller.
  • by Meshach ( 578918 ) on Tuesday December 04, 2007 @09:50PM (#21580419)
    Also including the size of the fine on the sign would probably do wonders
  • Re:Road Signs? (Score:3, Interesting)

    by wizardforce ( 1005805 ) on Tuesday December 04, 2007 @10:17PM (#21580663) Journal

    Haha! Truckers don't look at Road Signs! Hell, they don't even look before they change lanes

    :) that may be so but they *will* obey a nice set of reinforced concrete pillars ready to catch anyone foolish enough to disregard the signs. which is exactly what the local towns are doing over here...
  • Re:Road Signs? (Score:2, Interesting)

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday December 04, 2007 @10:25PM (#21580723)
    Additional signs aren't required - driving inappropriately close to other vehicles or pedestrians, which these truck drivers must be doing, is driving without due care and attention and comes with 3-9 penalty points so a truck driver who cops a couple of these is going to find himself cleaning trucks rather than driving them. Claiming there were no signs warning of narrow roads is likely to solicit a response of "are you registered blind" from any judge and the response to "satnav made me do it" doesn't bear thinking about. Thinking you can leg it off back to the other side of the channel isn't always going to work now as there are reciprocal arrangements with some countries.

    Local councils have very close ties with the local constabulary so it's easy for them to request a clampdown.
  • Re:Road Signs? (Score:5, Interesting)

    by slamb ( 119285 ) * on Tuesday December 04, 2007 @10:26PM (#21580737) Homepage

    Sounds like a great opportunity for the law enforcement officers of Barrow Gurney to make some money issuing fines.

    To me, it sounds like a rare instance of authorities caring more about safety than money. Unfortunately, your attitude seems to be more common - to the point that some communities (*cough*Union City, CA [thenewspaper.com]*cough) have been caught deliberately and illegally causing unsafe situations in order to increase revenue from traffic violations.

  • Re:Superlorry (Score:1, Interesting)

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday December 04, 2007 @11:31PM (#21581135)
    Australia has heaps of big trucks running around, B-doubles and tripples with 2 and three full size trailers as the name suggests.

    These trucks are restricted to certain roads/highways and its the drivers responsibility to know where they are. Cant follow a map and roadsigns? Say goodbye to your special license and its back to driving medium sized trucks.
    They have to keep a logbook of every road they drive on so its not too difficult for them to know which way to go.

    Theres heaps of roads even medium trucks aren't allowed on, lots of old wooden bridges and low height tunnels.

    They all seem to manage fine here and we don't need a cop hiding to catch them. The fines for trucks are big, but even worse they loose their license (= job) which is a pretty big deterrent, more than any fine.
  • by Epsillon ( 608775 ) on Tuesday December 04, 2007 @11:45PM (#21581253) Journal
    It isn't capitalised. An articulated lorry is exactly the same thing you would call a semi-trailer rig. A big-arsed steel thing with a stopping time of a fortnight and 18 wheels which really doesn't care whether you call it a truck or a lorry when some bastard pushes you in front of it. Funny thing is, most drivers call the tractor a truck when it's without its trailer. The mad sods even race the things. [teamoliver.co.uk] (WARNING: Flash video embedded right there in the front page)
  • Re:Road Signs? (Score:5, Interesting)

    by DeathElk ( 883654 ) on Wednesday December 05, 2007 @01:18AM (#21581855)

    Hmm, not always... reminds me of a story. A truck driver underestimated the height of his trailer and promptly got stuck under a bridge. As a huge traffic jam swelled up behind, the truck driver and sheriff walked around the truck, rubbing their chins. The driver tried reversing, but got only tyre spin and fould smelling smoke. It was really stuck.

    A motorist walked up and introduced himself as; "John Cooper, I helped design this bridge, maybe I can help".

    Much walking around, chin rubbing and head scratching ensued, amidst the spiraling honking and abuse.

    "I think we're going to have to bring in hydraulic lifts and raise the bridge slightly" Said John Cooper.

    "Ungh, my boss ain't gonna like that" Said the truck driver.

    Just then, a kid, riding by on his bike stopped, dismounted, took of his cap (this was before compulsory bicycle helmets), looked up and down and said...

    "Why don't you let some air out of the tyres?"

  • by rjschwarz ( 945384 ) on Wednesday December 05, 2007 @01:44AM (#21581979)
    Etak before they were bought by Teleatlas. There was a number of ways to downgrade a road so that the route choices avoided it. There were cases when our company sent mappers into urban areas where they felt there lives were in danger and we never really did anything about it. Problem was (in my opinion of course) that we had icons to establish an area was rich and didn't want random traffic but no icon to say the area was dangerous (from a mapping point of view the same icon would would have worked) and we were afraid of the appearance of racism or classism or whatever.
  • Re:Easier solution (Score:5, Interesting)

    by sethawoolley ( 1005201 ) on Wednesday December 05, 2007 @01:57AM (#21582043) Homepage
    it's not "a pint is a pint the world around".

    a pint is a *pound* the world around is the mnemonic that a liquid pint is ounce equivalent to weight pounds. 16 fl oz = pint, 16 oz = pound, so you know that 2oz is a quarter cup, 4oz is a half cup, 8oz is a cup, 16oz is a pint, and 32 oz is a quart, and 64 oz is a half and 128 oz is a gallon. Some people just have a hard time remembering where a pint fits into the system.

    I think powers of two are quite a natural system of measurement. Unfortunately, the French (and now the rest of the world) think a counting system based off the count of the digits on their hands and feet using Greek prefixes is somehow better.

    How anthropocentric.
  • Re:Road Signs? (Score:3, Interesting)

    by carlivar ( 119811 ) on Wednesday December 05, 2007 @03:07AM (#21582375)
    Union City is nothing new. In High School physics we had a project to time yellow lights in town along with speed limit and distance of the intersection, compared to deceleration (braking) of the average car.

    I would say about half of the lights the class examined had a "no win zone" where it was impossible to either make it through the intersection (w/o speeding) or brake in time if the light turned yellow. This was in 1994.

    I'm not sure if it's greed on the part of governments or just simple incompetence. Probably a bit of both.
  • Re:Road Signs? (Score:3, Interesting)

    by Gordonjcp ( 186804 ) on Wednesday December 05, 2007 @04:05AM (#21582593) Homepage
    I was thinking more of fire engines and buses. When they fitted chicanes to some of the streets in Aberdeen, they lasted about a month before complaints from residents, the bus company, and the fire brigade got them removed.
  • Re:Road Signs? (Score:3, Interesting)

    by Gordonjcp ( 186804 ) on Wednesday December 05, 2007 @04:14AM (#21582633) Homepage
    A set of tyres is relatively cheap, compared to the problem of extracting a wedged truck. I have actually seen this done, incidentally.
  • Re:Road Signs? (Score:3, Interesting)

    by Simon Brooke ( 45012 ) <stillyet@googlemail.com> on Wednesday December 05, 2007 @05:18AM (#21582859) Homepage Journal

    Haha! Truckers don't look at Road Signs!

    Indeed.

    My commute home takes me over a bridge which is 1.8 metres wide [streetmap.co.uk]. Last night the traffic was queueing back half a mile from the bridge. I cycled past the queue to find a bunch of polis [police.uk] trying to deal with a truck and trailer that were too wide for the bridge and too big to turn in the road.

    I thought as I watched them, 'ah, another victory for Tom Tom [tomtom.com]!'

  • Re:Road Signs? (Score:3, Interesting)

    by nmg196 ( 184961 ) * on Wednesday December 05, 2007 @05:41AM (#21582957)
    > One solution could be to petition the government to upgrade the highway through town or build a ring road.

    You've obviously never been to an English village before. You cannot 'upgrade the highway' in a village which has grade 2 listed buildings which are 9 feet apart. These buildings were built 200-300 years before the invention of the car. They are important historical buildings and are hardly going to be demolished just to put in a bigger road.
  • by erroneus ( 253617 ) on Wednesday December 05, 2007 @06:01AM (#21583027) Homepage
    The put up physical barriers. At first I was rather confused when I saw these pillars and other barriers on different roads. And when I asked various people who live there, they often didn't know. But I guess it only takes one person to know to stop asking as I eventually got the answer. Roads that are too narrow in places for vehicles of larger sizes (those little 2/3s cars were usually okay everywhere) would likely cause problems if they were permitted.

    No one reads road signs... well some people do, but the risk and frequency of that happening is too high.

    The barrier method is both obvious and effective. The only reason it never occurred to me naturally is that we don't have those here in the US. The nearest thing similar in effect in my area are those pipe-grated things that are often found along country roads. Don't know what they are called, but they are used to keep live stock from walking out into the street. We also have various barrier devices similar to those of the Japanese, but they are used to protect buildings or obvious devices and structures, not block access to roads or weak bridges.
  • Upcoming R&D (Score:3, Interesting)

    by iceZebra ( 1148629 ) on Wednesday December 05, 2007 @07:11AM (#21583327)
    Something else I neglected to mention. I work for the Safety, Standard and Research section of the Highways Agency. Responsible for technology projects with regard to the major road network in England; part of the Department for Transport.

    A project has been looked at and is undergoing further discussion (into whether it's DfT's, SatNav companies' or Haulage companies' responsibility) on a separate SatNav system specifically for haulage. I.e. a system that only uses roads with sufficient capacity for lorries. Should this come about it would solve this issue and many of other villages' issues.
  • Re:Four Wheelers (Score:3, Interesting)

    by hughk ( 248126 ) on Wednesday December 05, 2007 @08:14AM (#21583665) Journal
    Then perhaps the truck is too large for the road. The UK is one of the densest populated countries in Europe (and unlike NL, roads are constrained by the terrain). A truck with a trailer that may fit well in somewhere like a German autobahn ain't going to work in a British village. Actually it won't work well in a German village either which is why they place access restrictions. Switzerland has been somewhat wiser placing size restrictions on all trucks passing through.
  • by j-pimp ( 177072 ) <zippy1981@@@gmail...com> on Wednesday December 05, 2007 @10:15AM (#21584403) Homepage Journal

    Speed cameras are a poor way of getting funding. A speed camera violation means a minimum of 3 points on the license, along with the funds required to prosecute the driver. The £60 fine doesn't even begin to cover that.. and after 12 points you're banned anyway, so you can't catch the same person more than 4 times - which takes money out of the economy (not spending petrol, insurance, probably now unemployed so they're costing benefits and not paying taxes, etc.).

    I don't know about speeding camera's, but when you get caught by a red light camera in the US, they don't take points off your license, they just fine you. Also some jurisdictions will let you plea down to an offense with less points and more money, which is usually cheap to "prosecute, because you make the deal with the prosecutor, and the judge rubber stamps it. In Nassau County, New York when you first report to court to fight a ticket, the cop won't be there and if you actually want a trial you get a second date.

    Quite frankly, I don't see how you can take points away from someone caught with a camera. You can't prove who was driving the car.

  • Re:Road Signs? (Score:3, Interesting)

    by ajs ( 35943 ) <ajs@@@ajs...com> on Wednesday December 05, 2007 @11:23AM (#21585117) Homepage Journal

    Truckers don't look at Road Signs!
    They do, but there's a complicated heuristic involved in how they respond to them.

    I live on a street that as a clearly posted sign that says trucks may not drive down it after 10PM. However, it's the primary city street connecting central Cambridge, MA (USA) to downtown Somerville, MA. These two cities have a lot of trucking between them, and many truckers simply ignore the signs, knowing that police don't patrol the street.

    I'd really like it if GPS maps were more up-to-date with this info so that they could select the right path for a truck, but frankly until they do, it's the truckers' fault (they should not simply rely on the GPS to think for them).
  • by digitig ( 1056110 ) on Wednesday December 05, 2007 @12:38PM (#21586103)

    Quite frankly, I don't see how you can take points away from someone caught with a camera. You can't prove who was driving the car.
    This has been controversial in the UK. Essentially, the registered keeper is obliged to declare who was driving at the time of the offence. This has been challenged as being a breach of the European equivalent of the fifth amendment, but has been upheld. I'm not sure what happens if the person the registered keeper names denies being the driver, but I suspect it's for the registered keeper to prove -- I've certainly heard of drivers being held liable for parking fines when their vehicle was supposed to be in repair shop.

    Possibly even more of an issue is vehicles using false license plates. The criminals look around car parks and find the registration number of a car the same model and colour as theirs, and get a bent license plate maker to make them the false plates: http://www.bbc.co.uk/insideout/extra/series2/car_cloning.shtml [bbc.co.uk].

"When it comes to humility, I'm the greatest." -- Bullwinkle Moose

Working...