Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Businesses Privacy IT

How Best Buy Tried To Whip The Geek Squad Into Shape 476

The Consumerist site is featuring a follow-up to their Geek Squad porn collectors story, a feature we discussed back in July. According to Consumerist, Best Buy set up their own rigorous internal investigation to catch the culprits soon after these revelations became public. At that point, of course, employee morale went out the window. Draconian interrogation methods were apparently used, and innocent employees lost their jobs. "There were three Geek Squad members fired from my store including myself. The first two were fired for burning a non-copyrighted CD for another employee on a non company issued blank CD-R. I admitted in my interrogation that I was aware of this, and that I stopped these events after that occurrence. I was fired for being aware of this non copyrighted CD being copied. To quote, I did not provide the proper example of leadership. Keep in my mind I removed over 100 illegal tools and pirated discs upon my arrival as supervisor, as well as some remnants of an internal porn scandal."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

How Best Buy Tried To Whip The Geek Squad Into Shape

Comments Filter:
  • by Spinlock_1977 ( 777598 ) <Spinlock_1977@yah[ ]com ['oo.' in gap]> on Friday November 30, 2007 @06:34PM (#21538873) Journal
    Sounds like you did all the right things - I'd hire you in a snap. Don't let the micro-managers of the world get you down - their heads will be rolling down the same street soon.
  • by pak9rabid ( 1011935 ) on Friday November 30, 2007 @06:39PM (#21538925)
    I bet those $35k/year managers felt good after getting a chance to swing their dicks around. On a more positive note, I'm sure these guys will end up with better jobs now that there's motivation to look for one. That usually tends to be the case with talented people stuck in shit hole jobs.
  • by Cassini2 ( 956052 ) on Friday November 30, 2007 @06:41PM (#21538937)
    In Canada, you might have a case for wrongful dismissal. You stopped the activity from occurring after it occurred. Your not supposed to fire employees after every small infraction occurs. You need to try remedial action first. If you fired everyone that made a small mistake, you would run out of employees pretty quickly.
  • Comment removed (Score:5, Insightful)

    by account_deleted ( 4530225 ) on Friday November 30, 2007 @06:46PM (#21538993)
    Comment removed based on user account deletion
  • So at Best Buy... (Score:5, Insightful)

    by ackthpt ( 218170 ) * on Friday November 30, 2007 @06:46PM (#21538997) Homepage Journal

    So at Best Buy you show your management potential by collecting scalps. How is this different from too many other places?

  • One-sided guess (Score:5, Insightful)

    by secolactico ( 519805 ) on Friday November 30, 2007 @06:47PM (#21539007) Journal
    Based on the side of the story told in the article, I would guess that they couldn't find anybody "guilty enough" to fire. Maybe the one guy they caught with the illegal data and didn't fire had connections of some sort. Still, they wanted to fire somebody to make an example and their numbers came up. The CD burning incident was probably an excuse after the decision was taken.

    Still, it is only one side of the story and I don't know the author of the same so I'm basing my speculation on his word.

    After an embarrassing corporate incident, it's easier to look "tough on crime" and fire somebody than actually fixing the problem. "Yes, we had a security incident a while ago. 200 employees were fired as a result. We take this things seriously".
  • by SatanicPuppy ( 611928 ) * <SatanicpuppyNO@SPAMgmail.com> on Friday November 30, 2007 @06:50PM (#21539033) Journal
    Meh. It's all about their crappy hiring practices. If you're going to have employees dealing with sensitive information, you're going to have to do more than promote morons off the sales floor, and you're going to have to pay a decent wage, and get managers who have clue, and run audits and all the crap professional shops do.

    Are they going to do that? Goes without saying, the answer is no. Running a group of techies, especially bench techs, is like herding teenagers. They're all going to think they're smarter than you, they're all going to know the "right way" to do everything, and they're not going to listen to some low tech Bob whose community college associates degree entitles him to a big sexy manager job at best buy.

    Just another example of a big corporation trying to expand into a field it doesn't know a damn thing about.
  • by moderatorrater ( 1095745 ) on Friday November 30, 2007 @06:53PM (#21539055)
    People who need techs from a professional shop should get techs from a professional shop. Otherwise, they should know what kind of tech they're hiring and adjust their expectations accordingly.
  • Comment removed (Score:2, Insightful)

    by account_deleted ( 4530225 ) * on Friday November 30, 2007 @06:55PM (#21539075)
    Comment removed based on user account deletion
  • by Anonymous Coward on Friday November 30, 2007 @07:01PM (#21539139)
    Yeah, mom and dad are being tricked to think that Best Buy "IS" a professional shop.
  • by nurb432 ( 527695 ) on Friday November 30, 2007 @07:03PM (#21539167) Homepage Journal
    No, it really can be done. You just have to train yourself.

    Once you can sit at a desk with a CEO and help him format his confidential IPO document but don't read one word in the process, you have succeeded.
  • Re:Butlers (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Blkdeath ( 530393 ) on Friday November 30, 2007 @07:09PM (#21539219) Homepage

    But there's a reason Doctors and Lawyers cost so much. Do we really want $350/hr computer technicians?

    No, but $100-200/hour depending on the skill levels required sounds perfectly acceptable to me.

    I was priced out of the market in computer and networking repair in my area because of every Joe and Sally who'd taken a crash course, read a few books or were just "the smart computer person" in their house opening up shop and charging ridiculously low rates for repair work.

    Sure, for on-site work I was billing myself out at $60/hr and they were billing out at $20/hr. Sounds great, right? Sure it does; until you realize it takes them 5 hours to perform the tasks I can perform in 1 and mine won't be a cobbled together nightmare.

    Sure, a few clients realized this and called us back in to fix the problems these cheap techs caused them (usually more problems than solutions) but it simply wasn't enough. We couldn't compete with the prices, we couldn't stand (or afford) to contract ourselves out for such low rates and we wouldn't dream of resorting to the tactics these places used to ensure job security (namely "leave behinds").

    I've said for years that there should be a standard body for establishing credentials for computer technicians that includes proof of skills and semi-annual retesting to ensure skills development matches the pace of the industry and that a standardized set of fees should be established by this body to be charged by its members. If an organization chooses to have their work done by a non-member they do so at their own peril.

  • Re:Butlers (Score:3, Insightful)

    by Squalish ( 542159 ) <Squalish AT hotmail DOT com> on Friday November 30, 2007 @07:29PM (#21539417) Journal
    So go out there, and start a union/guild.

    That's the traditional thing to do when faced with a field where skilled, expert labor cannot compete with unskilled labor doing the same jobs.

    I was never a fan of organized labor as a negotiation tool - it's full of lose-lose situations, like whether to allow an airline's retirement benefits to lapse or allow the company to go bankrupt (resulting in those benefits being cut).

    But it has two other roles
    As a political action group, it can achieve things that no amount of corporate negotiation ever can. Laws can be passed which mandate particular benefits - benefits which two competitors individually would otherwise have incentives to cut in order to better compete.
    As a standards organization, it can ensure that its members are respected in a way that no amount of advertising ever can. A level of skill can be assured and a level of job mobility acquired by good performance, when in a corporate setting your expertise only potentially grants you a promotion to a level that your skills are irrelevant.
  • Re:Butlers (Score:5, Insightful)

    by b17bmbr ( 608864 ) on Friday November 30, 2007 @07:29PM (#21539419)
    A very funny answer for sure, but it is a simple economics question. not how much do we pay X, but rather how do we get people to put higher value on X's services (sorry, I teach econ.) or more importantly, how to get them to opportunity cost of data loss. My school has a job shadowing program. I like to tell my students that they should not shadow jobs they might want, but rather spend time at McDonalds shadowing a burger flipper. That way, they will learn the cost of not not getting a good education. sometimes, most times, we don't really know the value (really the opportunity cost, that which we give up) of something.

    I'd gather that most people who pay $15/hour for tech service have never had a major data/security failure. $350/hr tech service is cheap if your data is worth that much. I'd guess that even for most people, this holds true, though they don't realize it. when they do, it'll be to late!!
  • by KiahZero ( 610862 ) on Friday November 30, 2007 @07:30PM (#21539427)
    It doesn't work that way. Everyone's protected against discrimination on the basis of race, sex (including pregnancy status), national origin, religion. Disability, age, and I believe military status are non-reciprocal.

    If you're fired because you're white, you have a claim, just as you would if you were fired because you're black. If you're fired because you're a man, you have a claim, just as you would if you were fired because you're a woman. If you're fired because you're not pregnant (that'd be an interesting situation), you have a claim, just as you would if you were fired because you were pregnant. If you're fired because you're Christian, you have a claim, just as you would if you were fired because you're Discordian.

    On the other hand, discrimination on the basis of age is only actionable for any age over 50 (so if you were fired because the company preferred to have 60 year olds instead, you'd have a claim, but not if you were fired because of your youth below the age of 50). The ADA only covers the disabled, so there's no recourse there if you're fired because you're not disabled, and while I haven't dealt with military discrimination in the past, I believe the law is structured in a similar manner (it would depend on whether it was written as barring "discrimination on the basis of military status" or something similar, or if it was written as barring discrimination against people because of their current status in the armed forces).

    More on-topic, at-will employment does indeed suck.
  • by ZWithaPGGB ( 608529 ) on Friday November 30, 2007 @07:31PM (#21539443)
    The problem goes beyond Best Buy, and to the tech industry in general. The buyers, be they consumers or the corporate CFOs, really have no idea what they are buying, so they can only distinguish based on price. The result has been a race to the bottom.
    Honestly, I blame the consumers, they get what they deserve. Mechanics and Plumbers get paid more than computer techs, yet the computer field is more complex and changes faster. Why does anyone expect anything other than ignorant juvenile behavior for less than a living wage (which is at least $35/hr in CA)?
  • Re:Butlers (Score:3, Insightful)

    by hal9000(jr) ( 316943 ) on Friday November 30, 2007 @07:32PM (#21539455)
    Insightful? You have got to be kidding!

    You think you pay that much just for privacy? Hell, pay me $350/hr and I will keep your secrets. Nah brother, what we need are techs who are honest and ethics because that is right.
  • by davetd02 ( 212006 ) on Friday November 30, 2007 @07:33PM (#21539457)
    who cares if you copy a CD that you're allowed to copy?

    Because the whole problem that BestBuy had was techs copying material from customer computers. It sounds like the rule was "no copying of CDs, period" because that's a clear bright-line rule that is easy to enforce. If a CD is being copied then there's a problem. The alternative rule ("no copying unless you can prove it's yours") introduces a nightmare of proof and its own maze of privacy violations: if a supervisor suspects that a CD of personal data is being copied then he'd have to look through the files on it, which could be the employee's personal files or the customer's personal files. Inevitably there would be disputes as to whether the files could be copied or not ("I swear I was just copying software, not documents, from the customer's computers" or "this is my friend Billy's computer and he said it'd be OK") and the problem wouldn't get solved.

    In large organizations with a bunch of employees, bright-line rules are fair for everyone as long as they're well-publicized. Employees know exactly what behavior is and is not allowed, and the company can protect the privacy of its customers.

    Look for a new job, kid. It sucks that you lost this one, but there are a lot of better jobs out there.
  • by msimm ( 580077 ) on Friday November 30, 2007 @07:44PM (#21539575) Homepage

    Once you can sit at a desk with a CEO and help him format his confidential IPO document but don't read one word in the process, you have succeeded.
    Honestly I know what you're talking about. I can do it too, but it still worries me. Our priorities are funny.
  • Diploma mills (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Blkdeath ( 530393 ) on Friday November 30, 2007 @07:46PM (#21539587) Homepage

    You mean something like CompTIA?

    I've mentioned this guy before; he had graduated from a local technical school and was even a card-carrying A+ tech. As this school had the reputation of "pay to pass", I decided to test him, and pointing at an open box, asked him to point at the motherboard.

    No, I specifically avoided mentioning them because I firmly believe their organization and the certificates they provide aren't worth the paper they're printed on (even if they provided PDF files). It's also widely known amongst the technically literate which "schools" are little more than diploma factories (if you pay your $8 grand, hell, here's your diploma! You're now educated!) I've dealt with way too many "I have ${cert} so I'm qualified to make six figures! Hire me or your company will wither and die!" types to mention.

    My boss informed one of them that he should be a garbage man. See, he was trying to string together an ethernet LAN without using a hub or switch (because that's wrong, or something) but instead by installing two network cards in each of the fifteen computers and cabling them one to the next to the next in a lovely bastardization of, I dunno, token ring with ethernet with thinnet with ...

    What we need is a professional standards body that actually measures skills and mandates periodic skills reviews to maintain certification according to accepted industry guidelines. Practical examinations as well as an apprenticeship period would be preferable to ensure capability.

    If I'm not mistaken, one can still go out and buy a CompTIA A+ certification book, schedule a time to take the test and be certified without ever actually opening the case on a computer, which was also the cause of the complete industry-wide invalidation of the MCSE certification when it came out.

    Take for example Cisco certs (yeah yeah); the CCNA means nothing in a practical sense, but it does indicate that you have some grounding in networking fundamentals. Ok. So you can assist our network techs and troubleshoot problems at the LAN level. After a couple years experience you write the CCNP test. Now you're able to move into the bigger office and assist our WAN techs and touch the real routers. A few years of this and you enroll in the CCIE program. Combine that with 10+ years in the trenches and suddenly four letters mean you can pretty much write your own ticket.

    However if you somehow do manage to aquire even a CCIE but don't have a decades worth of relevant experience you may as well have saved yourself the few grand and just written your CCNA because, hey, you're our new tape switcher.

    Combine all this certification nonsense with HR people and management who don't understand anything about the computer industry but who do recognize "industry recognized certification body" and associate it with "skilled professional" and make the leap to "qualified for this position" and you have a very large disconnect from reality, compound that a million fold and welcome to today.

  • by FlyingGuy ( 989135 ) <.flyingguy. .at. .gmail.com.> on Friday November 30, 2007 @07:55PM (#21539677)

    It is quite difficult to tell from your remarks how far you went in stopping this. Point of fact, you were in a supervisory position, it was YOUR JOB to nail anyone to the corporate cross for doing anything that even remotely resembled breaking the privacy rules or repeating the previous behavior.

    The bottom line is this: When someone hires you to work on their computer, your job is to fix it not snoop around, not make copies of anything unless it is to preserve their data, and then you hand the customer the CD!

    I am consultant. I work on large systems and networks which frequently requires me to have ROOT passwords, all access, ect. I don't peek, I don't poke, I don't even ponder what might be hidden away on some corner of the corporate hard drive. I do the job I am being paid to do and wrap it up.

    If you get another job in a supervisory position of technical people who work on other peoples computers, especially if its ala GeekSquad, I suggest that you immediately, if not sooner, burn anyone you catch doing something like that, tack their hide up on the wall as an example for others and do your job.

    My guess is that the people who found their shit other then where they kept it are hiring or have hired lawyers and that Best Buy / GeekSquad are going to be dragged into court and taken to the cleaners for a lot of money.

  • Re:Butlers (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Technician ( 215283 ) on Friday November 30, 2007 @07:58PM (#21539695)

    Do we really want $350/hr computer technicians?

    As a computer technician I say yes, absolutely.


    I don't. It is for the same reason we don't use $100/hour TV repairmen. It's cheaper to replace it than fix it. I used to fix VCR's and Camcorders when they were well over $500 items. Now that many of them can be replaced for about 2 hours of labor or less, I have found other employment. Be careful what you wish for. You might get it and have no work.

  • by Penguinisto ( 415985 ) on Friday November 30, 2007 @08:03PM (#21539737) Journal

    Is there any reason that we CAN NOT have a computer tech or programmers union? Seriously.

    We could, but the question is - would you really want to?

    I mean, Unions are great for certain career fields, but this ain't one of them. While yes a Union would curb management excess, it also tends to retard employee excellence.

    Case in point - Seniority. You, I, and pretty much most folks who think it through know full well that time-on-the-job does not equal competency-on-the-job. Problem is, most Union shops (I've worked in a few as a member) eat, sleep, and breathe Seniority. This means that merit no longer counts.

    Admittedly, these obstacles are few, but some of them can be rather large ones.

    Go on strike? Err, why, because some poor bastard in some other company or division thereof got a raw deal by some jackass manager? Screw that. I saw something similar as a teacher once. The whole damned state union (UEA) wanted to walk out on a week of school days, because they only got a modest annual raise instead of a large one... Meanwhile, I had just got on, and had fully negotiated my own salary and benefits --to my satisfaction-- before I accepted the position; just like each and every one of them could have done (Utah state law fully allows this).

    I don't know... I guess I just prefer the free agency of it all. I like the fact that I can advance without waiting for someone ahead of me to die off or retire. I like being able to move into a senior position at a new place without having to pay the dues (both monetary and otherwise), or being locked into something I know I can get a better deal out of - if only I am allowed to negotiate it independently. If I want to do something after-hours, I can (okay, sometimes it's a have-to deal, but I knew that going in and I get paid overtime for such cases, so...)

    Anyrate, it's a whole other culture, and not exactly the panacea that it appears to be. Having been in good Unions (Ironworkers, local 493) and bad (Utah Educators Ass'n), I know that it's a whole other world that what most folks expect.

    (and if you think outsourcing is ugly now - just wait'll the PHB's realize you gave them a friggin' union to deal with. Your job will disappear faster than grain alcohol in a frat house).

    /P

  • Re:Butlers (Score:4, Insightful)

    by TheGeneration ( 228855 ) on Friday November 30, 2007 @08:38PM (#21539963) Journal
    Dude, you know you're talking to Americans right? American tech workers would rather die of starvation then pay a measly $100 a month (or less) in union dues for a union that gets them an additional $1k-2k more income.
  • Re:Butlers (Score:3, Insightful)

    by Blkdeath ( 530393 ) on Friday November 30, 2007 @08:40PM (#21539979) Homepage

    I don't. It is for the same reason we don't use $100/hour TV repairmen. It's cheaper to replace it than fix it. I used to fix VCR's and Camcorders when they were well over $500 items. Now that many of them can be replaced for about 2 hours of labor or less, I have found other employment. Be careful what you wish for. You might get it and have no work.

    Oh. At which retail outlet can I replace the last decades' worth of financials and client data for my company? What's that worth, the cost of a CD-R and some shrink wrap?

    It's not the cost of the vessel that matters, it's what's contained within that's worth $350/hour. I have nothing critical in my television set, however I would like the DVD back when I throw away my DVD player.

  • by Gazzonyx ( 982402 ) <scott,lovenberg&gmail,com> on Friday November 30, 2007 @08:56PM (#21540069)
    As a former manager of a fast food joint (it was good money for a high school student), I've seen a good number of managers who pull this crap. They're all talk. And they take themselves seriously. If you're ever in a situation like this again, push the envelope. If he says he's going to call the cops, and then doesn't, pick up the phone and call. Ask them to come down, as there is an issue that needs to be resolved. If they threaten to take it up to the store manager, suggest they call the regional manager and ask someone to get you the number (actually calling is a matter of politics that cannot be covered in a short message - but they won't let you anyways, so it's a moot point).


    If you're going to lose your job anyways over something you didn't do, take the time to put a black mark on their record as well. If you don't get fired (as you've put them in a place where all eyes are looking to see if they do the right thing), it's the last time anyone will accuse you of anything you didn't do. Ever.

    These type of people are bullies, and they get away with whatever they want until someone calls their bluff and one-ups them. They always pull you aside since they have no authority in a group; the more public you make the whole ordeal, the less power they have. Even if it's a crap job, the experience will pay off later down the road.

  • by Sycraft-fu ( 314770 ) on Friday November 30, 2007 @09:15PM (#21540201)
    The supply. That drives up prices too. If it costs more, both in monetary terms and non-economic things like time and intelligence, to do a given job it will raise the end cost of that position. If it costs more in terms of schooling and licensing, you have to charge more to make all that worth it. Nobody is going to take on $250,000 in university debt for a job that pays $6/hr, you'll never earn it back. Likewise the more skill something requires, the more options the people in it have and thus if they pay isn't high enough they won't do it.

    So it isn't just "They can charge more because people are willing to pay it," it is also a situation of if they couldn't charge a certain amount, they wouldn't do it. As such if you raise the cost of becoming a computer tech, the cost of services will go up. If it goes past a level people are willing to pay it won't result in lowering of prices, it'll just result in the disappearance of that job.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Friday November 30, 2007 @09:24PM (#21540269)
    "I, for one, am glad for the at-will employment laws. But, as with anything, they can be abused."

    As an employee I'd be glad for them as well, but they are not practiced in Canada.

    I find in Canada they don't want to take a chance in hiring people since they are harder to get rid of in comparison to America. (In France, it's almost impossible to fire someone and thus employees are extremely hesitant to hire). This promotes only friends and relatives being hired, etc.
  • Re:Butlers (Score:4, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday November 30, 2007 @09:25PM (#21540275)
    That's like saying that Webcor employs steelworkers and not their facilities guy to construct their skyscrapers even though hey they both know something about welding. The average home that geek squad goes into probably isn't running a 5,000 user Exchange server or optical switches for their SAN fabric.

  • Re:Butlers (Score:3, Insightful)

    by Technician ( 215283 ) on Friday November 30, 2007 @09:36PM (#21540353)
    Oh. At which retail outlet can I replace the last decades' worth of financials and client data for my company? What's that worth, the cost of a CD-R and some shrink wrap?

    Data Recovery services is another specialty. That can command high prices for data that is a lot more valuable than the hardware. Often computer repair is wipe and reinstall. You pay more for data recovery.
  • by CastrTroy ( 595695 ) on Friday November 30, 2007 @10:11PM (#21540583)
    Probably because you can replace the entire computer for $500 (or less). If your car breaks down, and the options are, spend $1000 on repairs, or buy a new car for $15,000, then the choice is pretty simple. However, when you go into a computer shop, your computer is 2 years old, and they tell you it will cost $100 to fix it, the many people will just choose to buy a new one. If computer techs cost $80 an hour like mechanics, nobody would ever get a computer repaired.
  • Re:Butlers (Score:5, Insightful)

    by JesseMcDonald ( 536341 ) on Friday November 30, 2007 @10:36PM (#21540767) Homepage

    American tech workers would rather die of starvation then pay a measly $100 a month (or less) in union dues for a union that gets them an additional $1k-2k more income.

    I don't know about you, but adherence to moral principles is worth a whole lot more to me than a measly $1-2k extra annually. You misrepresent the anti-union group's arguments by casting the issue in purely financial terms.

    Anyway, $100 a month ($1200 annually) for $1000 return would be a rather poor deal even without considering the strong moral and ethical arguments against coercing others out of work for your own benefit.

  • by Blkdeath ( 530393 ) on Friday November 30, 2007 @10:43PM (#21540803) Homepage

    Sorry that isn't enough to give high salaries. It is a good beginning step though. You want to know what the ??? step is towards profit? Scarcity.

    That's part of the problem with not having any sort of standardized governing body from the start. The cost of entry to IT is effectively the cost of either a home PC setup and an Internet connection, a couple books, the cost to sit for an A+ exam, etc. In other words, the cost is practically nil. Hence we have every high school/college kid or every burger flipper with a home PC and broadband (or dial-up in the beginning) thinking they're qualified to be a computer / network technician.

    Then comes the dot-com era. Techies are suddenly glamorous and anybody can make $75k/year out of high school, or if you graduate college/university you can walk into six figures straight away! Dilute that to include anybody with an MCSE, A+ et al. and you've got this massive influx of students into any educational facility or diploma mill that's accepting tuition cheques and we have this enormous surplus of "graduates" who now believe themselves qualified.

    In a way that killed us. HR departments and hiring managers never really, truly knew what to look for in terms of certifications. Experience was up in the air because so much technology was so new who could put a time frame on it, and how well did you learn it in the time you had with it? Remember back in '97 all those ads requiring "Minimum 5 years experience with Microsoft Windows'95"?

    QuantumRiff mentioned plumbers and I'm afraid in a multitude of ways he couldn't be more wrong. The prescribed method to gain full journeyman status in any skilled trade is exactly what he said and it's there for good reason. First you have to prove yourself educated and intelligent enough to gain entry which narrows the field right off the blocks. Next you have to gain your hours of apprenticeship working in the field with actual, experienced professionals. Yes, you have to earn your stripes doing B.S. work which will include coffee and lunch runs, sweeping floors and all the other crap jobs that come along. But hey, some day you'll have your own apprentice to do the same exact thing. Everybody went through it, new people are no exception. During the course of your apprenticeship you have to attend mandatory school sessions teaching gradually more and more advanced materials which you can now relate to your actual on-the-job experience so what your experienced bosses are telling you starts to make sense.

    After your 4-5 years and your x000 hours of service (with increasing pay every year, mind you) you're now a full-fledged plumber, electrician, mechanic, glazier, mason, etc. Now, if this were the case with computer / IT professionals - don't you think there'd be much fewer of [us|them] out there, namely the unqualified sort? The few who remained would logically command a much higher pay scale and who knows, maybe this (digital) world would even be a better place for it. :)

    As a side note to QuantumRiff; have you ever experienced a house with improper plumbing/venting? Ever experienced sewer gas creeping into the building, killing all the residents? Ever had a toilet back up so severely there is literally 8" deep raw sewage covering the floor? Ever taken a shower and been scalded to the point of permanent disfigurement?

    Yeah, didn't think so. Next time you have a problem with your skilled tradesman, keep it the hell to yourself.

  • Re:Butlers (Score:2, Insightful)

    by vuffi_raa ( 1089583 ) on Saturday December 01, 2007 @03:42AM (#21542191)

    but rather spend time at McDonalds shadowing a burger flipper. That way, they will learn the cost of not not getting a good education. sometimes, most times, we don't really know the value (really the opportunity cost, that which we give up) of something.
    I did not receive a "good education", I have a GED and am a college drop out (didn't have much choice- I grew up on welfare and was pretty much guaranteed not to go to college due to $ once I was in college I couldn't afford to pay my rent and go to school and one had to go) - I have worked as an investments manager, post graduate studies teacher at a university, an investing house DBA, contracted for many high profile clients during the .com boom and for the last few years have been working in corporate law doing forensics and database integration for corporate litigants.....yes I spent time doing construction and bartending and warehouse work when I was out of high school, but it wasn't a dead end.
    It is not a lack of education that makes you flip burgers, it is a lack of motivation and thirst for self-improvement. Rather than trying to "scare a kid straight" you would do better to encourage them to expand their base of understanding and knowledge and follow their interests and talents and most of all- learn to take risks. Telling a kid- "go to college or you will end up like this" puts in their head "If I go to college I will have a good job waiting when I graduate" and they end up on their parents' couch.
  • Re:Ha! (Score:3, Insightful)

    by canuck57 ( 662392 ) on Saturday December 01, 2007 @09:49AM (#21543495)

    ...And for Gods' sake; don't talk to a geek!" :-)

    Real geeks and geek squad are two different things.

    A real geek can go into the local parts store, order mobo and all the parts. Put one together, load the OS and then program the thing. Setup their own firewall and probably run Linux, BSD or other non-Windows OS. They get into wireless, networking, sniffing and software to depths geek squad could never go.

    Geek squad on the other hand is really a salesperson in disguise. The idea is to bilk you for services you do not need.

    CBC Marketplace video [www.cbc.ca] explains. These are not geeks or nurds, they are modern day snake oil salesmen.

    Don't insult real geeks. Real geeks would have all these problems fixed properly in less than 10 minutes or recommend that the system is so old it is cheaper to buy a new one. But real geeks don't drive stupid vehicles and they sure don't work for $30/hr or less.

Happiness is twin floppies.

Working...