Lawmakers Delay Telco Immunity Vote 102
eweekhickins writes "The US Senate Judiciary Committee delayed a scheduled vote on whether telecommunications carriers should be granted immunity for cooperating with the White House's domestic spying program of telephone wiretapping and e-mail surveillance. The panel hopes to vote on the provision as soon as next week. Senator Pat Leahy said that immunity would make it impossible for Americans to seek redress for 'illegal' violations of their privacy." The article points out the confused state of the immunity measure: the House is considering a version of FISA renewal that has no immunity; in the Senate, two committees are working on different versions, one with immunity, one without.
Judiciary Committees (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Other side (Score:1, Informative)
Re:Obvious reason (Score:2, Informative)
Wrong (Score:5, Informative)
Telecoms don't go to prison like you or I would. At most they incur legal expenses- probably less than a day's operating expenses- it's the cost of doing business. And they could have easily told the government to screw themselves. They were cooperating with these patently illegal requests even before 9/11.
Telecom immunity is obstruction of justice enshrined into law.
Stupid (Score:4, Informative)
Doesn't really matter (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Doesn't matter (Score:2, Informative)