US Consumers Clueless About Online Tracking 228
Arashtamere writes "A study on consumer perceptions about online privacy, undertaken by the Samuelson Clinic at the University of California and the Annenberg Public Policy Center, found that the average American consumer is largely unaware that every move they make online can be, and often is, tracked by online marketers and advertising networks. Those surveyed showed little knowledge on the extent to which online tracking is happening or how the information obtained can be used. More than half of those surveyed — about 55 percent — falsely assumed that a company's privacy polices prohibited it from sharing their addresses and purchases with affiliated companies. Nearly four out of 10 online shoppers falsely believed that a company's privacy policy prohibits it from using information to analyze an individuals' activities online. And a similar number assumed that an online privacy policy meant that a company they're doing business with wouldn't collect data on their online activities and combine it with other information to create a behavioral profile."
US consumers are clueless about technology (Score:4, Informative)
Re:U. S. Consumers Clueless ... (Score:3, Informative)
There, fixed it for you without being a troll.
My worst offender? ACLU! (Score:5, Informative)
When donating them money in 2006, I specified a "special" address, which contained "from ACLU" in the "Line 1" of the address. The actual address went to "Line 2" of their form. I do this with all establishments I'm dealing with — just in case.
A month or so later invitations to subscribe to "The Nation" (a disgusting uber-Left rag) started showing up bearing the "from ACLU" address...
Now, I expected the ACLU to be bi-partisan — and concerned with my privacy. Asking me for money the next year is fair game. But sharing my info with other — completely unrelated — organizations? Very disappointing...
Somehow, nothing but parcels from Amazon has shown up bearing the "from Amazon" address.
Re:i keep waiting for the day (Score:1, Informative)
I guess you didn't read the article?
Yeah, yeah, I know it's slashdot and all...
The study found that people do actually care. Their behavior is not due to not caring about the tracking that is going on but being completely ignorant that there is any tracking at all going on.
Comment removed (Score:5, Informative)
Re:No Real Surprise (Score:3, Informative)
AT&T + NSA 0wns all your bases! (Score:3, Informative)
References:
1) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m-aQ_o_yi-s [youtube.com]
2) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TWW09xzJfS0 [youtube.com]
3) http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2006-05-10-nsa_x.htm [usatoday.com]
4) http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2006/06/the_newbies_gui.html?entry_id=1510938 [wired.com]
Re:Not just online tracking... (Score:5, Informative)
I can tell you that as popular as this myth is, VISA is not generally able to track what you purchase. Generally, all they know is where you shopped and how much you spent, not what individual items you spent on.
The nearest there is to an exception to this is in hotels and fleet card purchases -- in the case of Hotels, VISA gets a breakdown of what money was spent on the room vs the room service vs the hotel lobby store, etc. Still doesn't know what actual items were purchased, but they do get told your check-in and check-out dates and some other things. For fleet card they might get told how many gallons of gas you purchased, but that's about it.
I know, I grew up thinking VISA was watching me, too, but it turns out it's just not watching that closesly. It doesn't have the capability; the protocols whereby credit card information are transferred just don't have any specification for that level of reporting.