USPTO Rejects Amazon's One-Click Patent 166
igdmlgd writes "A while ago I filed a reexamination request for the Amazon.com one-click patent and recently checked out the USPTO online file wrapper -it seems they have rejected all the claims I requested they look at and more!" And it only took many many years to remove what would have been obvious to the most incompetent web developer.
Huh? (Score:5, Funny)
I read that there was a rejection review during which the rejection examiner found prior art that was obvious. This however was not the case and so the rejection was rejected and now I hear this guy making claims that some of his obvious prior art is infact obvious and should be counted on so the patent is now invalid.
What I don't understand is What is a Wookie doing on Endor?
Can someone give me one thing I can click which will explain this whole thing?
Oh no you didn't!!!! (Score:1, Funny)
I am NEVER inviting you over for Xmas to show you my collection of Cuban cigars, black cable box, 120 Gigs of MP3s, hundreds of burnt DVDs, my ex-girlfriend buried in a shoebox in my backyard, nor my collection of tags I have cut off of mattresses over the years!
Re:Huh? (Score:4, Funny)
Huh, no-click answers. I should patent that...
Re:Huh? (Score:5, Funny)
I could, but I'd have to get your promise that you'd click twice to get to it...at least until this whole thing blows over.
Posted this... (Score:1, Funny)
Re:Oh no you didn't!!!! (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Oh no you didn't!!!! (Score:1, Funny)
Your girlfriend was a hamster?
Damn (Score:3, Funny)
Does this mean (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Huh? (Score:2, Funny)