Novell to SCO - Pay Up 151
gosherm writes with word that, now that the dust is beginning to settle on the long-running SCO case, Novell wants to get paid. Now. They're requesting that the customary stay on SCO's finances (as a result of their bankruptcy) be lifted so that Novell can begin recouping some of its losses from the protracted legal battle. "'We need to adjudicate if this is money owed to Novell or if it is Novell's property,' said Bruce Lowry, spokesman for Novell. That could determine how quickly Novell can recover those funds. And time is of the essence since there's a possibility SCO 'may run low or even completely out of cash during the process of trying to reorganize,' Novell said in court documents filed Thursday. Novell is also trying to protect royalties SCO collects from Unix and Unixware software licensees and remits annually to the software developer. SCO is required to continue to remit between $500,000 and $800,000 annually to Novell -- the next payment is due Nov. 14. SCO remitted $696,413 to Novell between the third quarter of 2006 and the second quarter of this year."
Re:Where is Darl's big mouth now? (Score:5, Informative)
Beautiful, innit?
Yes, you are. (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Comical Ali lives? (Score:3, Informative)
SCO got that wrong, too (Score:5, Informative)
Somebody went through Judge Kimball's entire summary judgement appeal record and posted it. [investorvillage.com] No, he doesn't get reversed two-thirds of the time.
Re:Where is Darl's big mouth now? (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Where is Darl's big mouth now? (Score:4, Informative)
And as such, SCO never had the authority to claim infringement on the copyrights or patents that go along with UNIX. SCO could however sue Linux or anybody else if they claimed that their OS was UNIX, as SCO has the legal right to decide which OSes are or are not UNIX. They could also sue anybody that was selling copies or licenses of UNIX without their say so.
I don't know how an attorney, especially an IP attorney, wouldn't know that you can't buy a copyright. It just seems like one of those things that you should know before you set forth to buy something. Worse still for SCO was that it was explicitly stated in the terms of the contract that the neither the copyright nor the patents were included with the exclusive trademark and licensing rights.
Re:Novell should just... (Score:1, Informative)
-uso.
Re:So, does this mean Novell owns them? (Score:1, Informative)
Technically, Novell isn't a creditor. SCO is acting as an agent for Novell; collecting license fees and forwarding them to Novell (and receiving a 5% administration fee). That means, legally, that it's not SCO's money to begin with.
Someone used the analogy of a person robbing a bank then declaring backruptcy and then trying pay the bank back 10 cents on the dollar because they're a creditor. No, it doesn't work that way.
Just as the bank robber's money still belongs to the bank, the SVRX license fees belong to Novell. Novell is not a creditor to be paid 10 cents on the dollar.
(-1, Wrong) (Score:5, Informative)
(IANAL)
Re:(-1, Wrong) (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Who Will Get Unix? (Score:3, Informative)
The 5-day trial which was suspended due to SCO's application for Ch11 bankruptcy was all about finding how much of that revenue was Novell's. SCo petitioned for bankruptcy on the last business day before the scheduled start of the trial.
Re:out of money (Score:3, Informative)
Not exactly (Score:3, Informative)