Ohio Court Admits Lie Detector Tests As Evidence 198
An anonymous reader writes "Last month, an Ohio court set a new precedent by allowing polygraph test results to be entered as evidence in a criminal trial. Do lie detectors really belong in the court room? AntiPolygraph.org critiques the polygraph evidence from the this precedential case (Ohio v. Sharma)."
Ohio, eh? (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Ohio, eh? (Score:5, Funny)
Given your subject line of "Ohio, eh?" and you're moving to a different state, and that you're down to 49 possibilities, I can only conclude you're one of those that view Canada as the 51st state. Come on up, we've got plenty of room, beer, and freshly-clubbed baby seals to go around. You do like hockey, eh?
Re:Weight vs admissibility (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Lie Dectectors will persist... (Score:4, Funny)
Lie detectors are bullsh*t and don't work! (Score:3, Funny)
If I can illustrate the kinds of test questions that were asked. Do you drink (yes) Bzzt, wrong answer. Are you male (yes) Bzzt, wrong answer. Is it daytime (yes) Bzzt, wrong answer.
Any technology that cannot tell if a fat male drunk is awake in the daytime ain't worth a damn!
No, I didn't get the job.
Re:Accuracy as against usefulness (Score:4, Funny)
-
Re:No (Score:3, Funny)