WordLogic Patented the Predictive Interface 173
Packetl055 writes "Have any of you heard anything about this company, WordLogic, with a soon to be granted/issued patent with 117 claims for predictability software? They recently received a patent approval/allowance letter from the US Patent and Trademark Office. Their patent application was submitted in March 2000. If I read this correctly, any software that gives you any prediction after you type something is infringing on their patent — e.g. vehicle navigation systems, cellular telephones, PDA's, Google with their 'Did You Mean' when using Google for a search, the new Apple I-Phone, Blackberry, Sony Playstation-3, etc., etc. If true, this is going to be huge: lawsuits after lawsuits." Their stock trend over the last few days suggests that somebody was paying attention to the the USPTO news from August 9. WordLogic makes products (assistive input software) and doesn't seem to be merely a patent troll.
Yet another reason why software patents are bad (Score:2, Interesting)
Hmmm...... (Score:4, Interesting)
Just because they make products doesn't mean that they aren't a patent troll.
Prior Art (Score:5, Interesting)
Like a spellchecker? (Score:3, Interesting)
In what way would this differ from a spellchecker, said technology being available since at least the 1970s?
Re:Hmmm...... (Score:1, Interesting)
Good catch! This company does not seem to sell much for the moment.
Could this announcement on /. be just a way to get attention and increase their stock value?
I mean, it wouldn't be the first time that /. relays some slashvertisements or pump-and-dump scams...
I met them - they're not a patent troll (Score:3, Interesting)
The product they showed me lets you create a dictionary of common phrases (which can be very long), then retrieve and input them easily using their predictive input algorithm to drill down through multiple possibilities. The software sits on top of Windows, essentially between the keywoard and whatever app you're using. It reminded me somewhat of Stephen Hawking's system (which I vaguely recall having seen on TV once) or Chinese word processor software which allows you to type in a syllable, then pops up a list of matching characters and lets you pick one by typing a number (though the fellow I spoke with wasn't familiar with this). Example uses described to me included lawyers, who might want to pull up whole paragraphs of boilerplate text, and students (I don't recall the use case for this).
Re:obvious (Score:2, Interesting)
It's interesting that we don't really have any idea what their patent actually says yet we all know it's incredibly obvious! Why wasn't it patented earlier? Maybe they do something differently? Maybe it's not that fact that they can do it, but rather how they accomplish it that is patented.
You can patent dropping rocks on the ground if your method is new, better, or improved upon the earlier design. a catapult would be a terrific way of "dropping" rocks on the ground.
I won't even get into how the rest of your analogy doesn't apply in the slightest. Plus, it doesn't involve cars.