Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Patents Government Politics

Sharp Rise Seen in Chinese Patents 110

ianare writes "According to a report by the UN's intellectual property agency, the number of requests for patents in China grew by 33% in 2005 compared with the previous year. That gives it the world's third highest number behind Japan and the United States, the agency said. China's leaders have been urging companies to become more creative, and put more of their money into developing new technology. 'Made by China' rather than simply 'Made in China' will mean that the country's economic miracle stands a far better chance of lasting longer."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Sharp Rise Seen in Chinese Patents

Comments Filter:
  • Re:I wonder if... (Score:4, Insightful)

    by yahyamf ( 751776 ) on Sunday August 12, 2007 @08:28AM (#20202217)
    That's an interesting point. The Chinese sell low quality goods and get paid in a low quality currency in exchange. They are holding over a trillion US dollars and stand to lose quite a bit due to rapid devaluation by the US Fed. However, the depreciating dollars do not exclusively affect China. It affects everyone with dollar denominated assets, especially Americans. Just look at the increasing prices of basic necessities like food and gas in recent years.


    Sure, China might take a hit on their huge USD reserves, but in the mean while, they have built hundreds of factories, infrastructure and acquired real skills and real wealth. McDonalds recently announced [google.com] a 30% pay raise for its employees in China. When was the last time that happened in the US?


    They are also gaining political influence in countries with rich natural resources, such as in Africa and the Middle East. That influence would remain long after the dollar loses its reserve currency status. Their stockpile of dollars is also being used to threaten [telegraph.co.uk] the US itself.

  • by gathas ( 588371 ) on Sunday August 12, 2007 @08:35AM (#20202237)
    I welcome the rest of the world starting to step up to plate and contribute. Innovation isn't a zero sum game and the more creative people working in integrated and "open" economies the better. A successful China doesn't need to be a negative to the world. The competition between G7 countries results in a net positive. Admittedly China still poses many concerns with it's repressive government. However the more integrated and successful they become, the more they have to lose by not playing by international rules. There are a billion Chinese looking to take your job, but hopefully there will also be a billion Chinese consumers looking for your goods and services.
  • by rtb61 ( 674572 ) on Sunday August 12, 2007 @08:51AM (#20202287) Homepage
    Not only did China get ahead with cheap labour but also with poor working conditions, no pollution restrictions, minimum or no safety/ health conditions and corruption to grease the wheels of profit for those autocrats running the corporofascist society.

    One reason for the shift to IP instead of production could quite simply be because China is currently quite busily polluting itself to death. As the level of toxic elements rises in the environment it will be interesting to see what future chemical chain reactions will occur and how high the death toll will rise.

    Meanwhile those who reaped the profits while destroying their country will be seeking means by which to bail with their wealth intact and seek to secure future means of income.

  • China's Miracle? (Score:4, Insightful)

    by Overzeetop ( 214511 ) on Sunday August 12, 2007 @09:14AM (#20202359) Journal
    Come now, you have dirt cheap labor, little to no government environmental/personnel regulation, and a fixed yuan-dollar ratio. There's no miracle, it's just simple economics. Had China not been closed for so many years, they would have reached this point a couple of decades ago.

    China will find the same problem that the west has - everyone want's to be upper (or middle) class eventually. Very few in China are reaping the benfits of the changes, and many are happy just to make a better living than they had before. Eventually, thier children - or children's children - will want far more, and will expect more. A growing middle class will not put up with the destruction of their natural environment and unsafe (or "unfair" - definine it as you wish) working conditions. Pressure will be placed on the govenerment from many sides, and the government will start changing things.

    It is simply a matter of time before things change. There are still places where manufacturing is cheap in the US. There are places in the US where $50k can provide a pleasant lifestyle for a family, and $80-90k is the local upper class. And some of those places are pretty darned nice places to live. Some may think those numbers are high, and those of you in the major metro areas will wonder how anyone can afford groceries on such an income. (Hint: in the next town over from me, there are new, 2000SF houses on a acre of land selling for under $100/sf, and taxes are under 1% of the value) As the middle class increases in China, the same wage pressures will occur, and - if they ever de-link their currency - it's going to result in the cost of goods from China increasing at a dramatic rate.

    There will be more IP based production - it's the hallmark of modern civilization. Interestingly, I think we will find globalization retreat a bit in the next 50 years. As the cost of production increases in low-wage markets, transportation costs will shift marginal items back to a local advantage. This may become accellerated by the increasing cost for fuel (which, imho, is artificially inflated by the speculation markets...but that's another show). It will not put things back to the 1960s or 70s, but a new dynamic balance will form.

  • by Fear the Clam ( 230933 ) on Sunday August 12, 2007 @09:40AM (#20202479)
    I'm sure the rest of the world will treat Chinese IP with the same respect that they've shown for the rest of the world.

    Knowing China's penchant for taking shortcuts, I'd double-check every one of those patents against existing registries.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Sunday August 12, 2007 @10:12AM (#20202673)
    1) Force people to work for a pittance

    A pittance in the US is a decent wage in China. A standard year of work in the US, is slave labor in France.

    2) Allow children to make toxic toys for Americans

    Don't buy them.

    3) No minimum hours per week, no overtime

    Did you mean Maximum hours? There are laws. Enforcement is lax, but they do exist. I'm in China. I get overtime, paid vacations, paid health insurance.

    4) IP theft

    And this is different from anyone else?

    5) Lax environmental regulations

    Yes. Kinda similar to the US 100 years ago.

  • it's not a miracle (Score:5, Insightful)

    by dAzED1 ( 33635 ) on Sunday August 12, 2007 @11:41AM (#20203235) Journal
    'Made by China' rather than simply 'Made in China' will mean that the country's economic miracle stands a far better chance of lasting longer.

    I suppose it was a "miracle" when we used slaves here in the US to do farming, build railroads, etc?

    They have 1/5 the total world population...current estimate: 1,321,851,888.

    Japan has 127,433,494 people.

    And the US? 301,139,947.

    China has more than 3 times the population of Japan and the US combined.

    Further, China is taking the cheapest route on everything, and is suffering for it. The air quality there is horrendous, the water isn't drinkable - hell, we'll need to worry about them invading someone soon just so they can find someplace to be able to breathe. Cutting corners, doing no pollution control, no sanitation efforts...yeah, of course you can make extra $$ that way. At what cost, though.

    The only miraculous thing here is that they are doing so poorly despite these and other things massively in their favor.
  • by w000t ( 1141427 ) on Sunday August 12, 2007 @01:09PM (#20203847)
    What? Are you saying that a population that big is actually something in their favor? It's not, that's why they have birth control laws. Unlike some people here seem to believe, China is not building an army to overtake the world (which is about the one scenario where having such a big population would be a good thing).
    Now, what I really don't get is why everyone seems is so concerned with China becoming a wealthy country... Shouldn't the fact that 1/5 of the world population lives there make it a good thing?

An Ada exception is when a routine gets in trouble and says 'Beam me up, Scotty'.

Working...