Facebook In Court 129
ScaredOfTheMan writes "'The lawsuit, filed by brothers Cameron and Tyler Winklevoss, and Divya Narendra, accuses Zuckerberg, Facebook's 23-year-old C.E.O, of stealing the source code, design, and business plan for Facebook in 2003 when he briefly worked in the Harvard dorms as a programmer for their own fledgling social-networking site, now known as ConnectU.
The plaintiffs have demanded that Facebook be shut down and that full control of the site — and its profits — be turned over to them.'
I just wonder why they waited so long to sue? If he really stole their idea in 2003, why wait four years?"
of course, sue now (Score:2, Interesting)
Because suing isn't about moral properness, suing is a business decision. You sue to profit. That's why you sue for money instead of, say, a sincere apology. Everyone's had business ideas and get-rich schemes stolen, you only sue if someone actually manages to succeed with your half-baked never-completed plan.
(Put me in the school of "it's not the idea or the code, it's the execution plus luck that creates success" school of thought.)
'Apology only lawsuits' are limited to kindergarten playgrounds, I guess.
Then there's the whole 'lawsuit as vengeance' school of thought, but in some ways that's even worse than suing just for money.
The more I write this, the more I increase my cynicism about the US legal system.
Serendipity ? (Score:3, Interesting)
Facebook COUNTERSUED! (Score:4, Interesting)
However, it seems like Facebook's suit is more of a leverage to get the first case dismissed. Facebook is saying ConnectU damaged them somehow, but when asked, Facebook said they couldn't identify what the damages were. This is from a company worth billions, and rejected a $1 billion buy out offer.
And the defendent list includes new people, Winston Williams, Pacific Northwest Software, Wayne Chang, David Gucwa.
Let the battle of the titans begin!
Re:Musta only stole the good bits (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:of course, sue now (Score:5, Interesting)
If I look over your garden fence and see that you're building a giant widget and then you notice and offer me a tour of your giant widget do you have any legal recourse if I decide that I like the idea of having my own giant widget and then make one for myself?
My gut instinct in that scenario is that you're screwed, unless you got any form of agreement from me before you showed me it. No agreement, no case.
Is my copying your idea without at least getting your permission ethical? I'd say no but others would disagree. Is it legal? Well, if you didn't get me to sign anything then, unfortunately for you, the answer is probably yes.
Re:why wait four years? (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:You'd expect the poster to have read the articl (Score:5, Interesting)
Facebook went a step beyond just that, they are also suing the programmers that worked for ConnectU at the time. I am now looking at having to pay a potential $25,000 if Facebook wins because I coded for ConnectU, simply because of this countersuit. Talk about unethical lawsuits...
Re:Why wait (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:You'd expect the poster to have read the articl (Score:3, Interesting)