Expectation of Privacy Extended to Email 161
An anonymous reader writes "In a 6th circuit court decision [PDF] today 4th amendment expectation of privacy rights were extended to email. 'The ruling by the Sixth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Ohio upholds a lower court ruling that placed a temporary injunction on e-mail searches in a fraud investigation against Steven Warshak, who runs a supplements company best known for a male enhancement product called Enzyte. Warshak hawks Enzyte using "Smiling Bob" ads that have gained some notoriety.'"
Great! (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Well... (Score:1, Funny)
Re:too bad (Score:5, Funny)
I agree.
Well, except for rich people. And pharmaceutical companies that spend more on advertising than research. AFAIK, they're first against the wall.
But yeah, equal treatment for everyone else.
Re:wording (Score:4, Funny)
Re:How is email privacy currently violated? (Score:3, Funny)
Re:too bad (Score:4, Funny)
Re:too bad (Score:4, Funny)
While you collect the $20'000 for the M16, I can get 10 AK-74s and 50kg of ammo... and still have some money left over.
See - you don't need money, just some common sense.
My T-shirt (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Enzyte Why? (Score:5, Funny)
I never understood how Enzyte ever got that big
Apparently they use their own product ...
Re:Well... (Score:5, Funny)
Gag gift at the office Christmas party. (Score:1, Funny)
A package of Enzyte makes one hell of a gag gift at the office Christmas party where all the gifts are anonymous and everybody has to select one at random from under the tree, or steal one from a co-worker that's already opened theirs.
Re:too bad (Score:4, Funny)
One difference might be that people sort of think of email more like a letter than a postcard. A court could find that email has protections similar to a letter.
But how can this situation be likened to a car? Car analogies are always the best way to explain complicated things!
Re:Can we extend this (Score:4, Funny)