Microsoft's Acoustic Caller ID Patent 185
theodp writes "A new patent granted to Microsoft Tuesday for automatic identification of telephone callers based on voice characteristics
covers constructing acoustic models for telephone callers by identifying words or subject matter commonly used by callers and capturing the acoustic properties of any utterance. Not only that, it's done 'without alerting the caller during the call that the caller is being identified,' boasts Microsoft in the patent claims."
Only Innovation: Real Time versus Offline? (Score:3, Interesting)
Can they detect how pissed off i am? (Score:3, Interesting)
Verification of identity (Score:5, Interesting)
If someone had acquired some of your personal information, and then tried to impersonate you, an automated voice recognition system could be useful by raising an alarm, or at least giving a percentage of how much their voice is like yours.
Re:Can they detect how pissed off i am? (Score:4, Interesting)
Patenting intelligence (Score:2, Interesting)
By "high level" I mean things like word choice, language etc. By low level I imagine they mean things like the specific resonance characteristics of a voice. In voice there are intermediate levels of features too, such a the characteristics of phonemes.
The upshot of this is that just as algorithms and hardware begins to reach a level of power necessary to show intelligence, it will be impossible to do so without stepping on patents.
We will have patents on a machine not being stupid.
Comment removed (Score:3, Interesting)
'without alerting the caller....' (Score:1, Interesting)
'without alerting the caller during the call that the caller is being identified'
Don't we have laws against doing stuff with voices without informing people first? And since when is sampling audio, and then converting part or all of the audio to a format based on, and unique to the original, not an act of recording?
So ... (Score:3, Interesting)
Not only that, it's done 'without alerting the caller during the call that the caller is being identified,'
They are describing a means to RECORD callers without their knowledge, and hence without their consent. So would this software be illegal in some jurisdictions? You bet yer ass it would be.
Wonder how it handles people who say "uhm" or "uhh" a lot.