Fair Use In Scientific Blogging 103
GrumpySimon writes "Recently, the well-read science blog Retrospectacle posted an article on a scientific paper that concluded that alcohol augments the antioxidant properties of fruit. The blog post reproduced a chart and a table from the original article and everything was fully attributed. When the publisher John Wiley & Sons found out, they threatened legal action unless the chart and table were removed. Understandably, this whole mess has stirred up quite a storm of protest. Many people see Retrospectacle's action as plainly falling under fair use. There is a call for a boycott of Wiley and Wiley's journals."
When Darwin Meets Publishing (Score:4, Interesting)
And it would seem that producing valid data in the form of a chart, publishing it and then going after someone for publicizing your findings is fool hearty at best, but sadly also very mean spirited and it works against the mission of the scientists in the long run.
I will not seek to help profit those who would still falsely believe in a captive audience, so therefore this publisher is coming off my reading list.
both sides (Score:4, Interesting)
loot at the actual link (Score:4, Interesting)
fair use (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Ridiculous (Score:3, Interesting)
Maybe it's an ex-senior staffer who's now a junior staffer or is that even more unbelievable nowadays
Re:Ridiculous (Score:3, Interesting)
Yes, in addition, it creates a type of legal question-begging: if you routinely grant permission for what would be fair use anyway, no one can take you to court to say they don't need your permission to engage in fair use, so fair use rights can never be firmly tested. Very convenient!
Other questions to ponder are whether this is a routine scare-tactic from Wiley (which they would back down on, but cows 95% would-be users), etc. All worthy of discussion in this thread, but probably, at this point, not worth another ream of e-mail to the so-called "junior staffer."
This isn't fair use (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Ridiculous (Score:3, Interesting)
In short - I wouldn't trust them as far as I could spit them.